690D.91/7–2851: Telegram
The Ambassador in India (Henderson) to the Secretary of State
403, Ref London’s 565 July 27 to Dept, rptd New Delhi 17 Karachi 17. Interpretation Nehru reaction US move as “unresponsive” seems not entirely accurate. Emb believes Nehru was about as responsive as could have been expected in the circumstances.
Bulk of 45-minute interview consisted of essentially defensive explanation by PriMin of how India was drawn into Kashmir military operations repugnant to govt and people nurtured for 30 years on philosophy of nonviolence—in which they still believed. He appeared sensitive about invidious position which threatened India in world opinion—and genuinely desirous, but rather despairing, of finding honorable solution acceptable both parties.
PriMin’s desire on July 27 was certainly to give impression of being receptive and cooperative. Promises to do utmost which he gave must, of course, be taken with all reservations, and their value judged by future events.