893.00/1–549

The British Ambassador (Franks) to the Acting Secretary of State (Lovett)

Mr. Bevin6 has recently discussed the situation in China with his Cabinet colleagues and he has asked me to bring to your notice the substance of a Memorandum drawn up for Cabinet consideration. This document7 is long and detailed and I have thought it better to prepare a short summary8 rather than to ask you to explore the whole range of its findings. I should accordingly be grateful if you would nominate one of your advisers to confer with Mr. Graves9 of my staff on the details of the Memorandum.

Mr. Bevin hopes that, as a result of our joint study of the views and comments set out in the Memorandum, it may be possible to suggest the broad basis of a plan for dealing with the rapidly developing position in the Far East.

[Enclosure]

The British Embassy to the Department of State

China

Foreign Office appreciation of the present position

The Government of the Republic of China under President Chiang Kai-shek has virtually lost control of the whole area north of the River Yangtze as the direct result of military failures in Manchuria. Moreover, it seems highly unlikely that the Government forces, whose fighting value is at best problematical, will be able to hold their [Page 3] ground on the south bank of the river in the face of determined pressure from the Communists. The northern Communist armies now hold the initiative and are making an all-out drive on Nanking with intent to dislodge the Central Government from its capital. The consensus of expert opinion is that success is merely a matter of time.

Following on the Communist occupation of the whole area north of the Yangtze the political situation is likely to take one of two courses:—

(a)
The disappearance from the scene of Chiang Kai-shek, when the Government, headed by Vice-President Li Tsung-jen and with the support of certain military leaders, may try for a military truce and a subsequent political arrangement by negotiation with the Communists. As the latter hold the whip hand it is likely to rest with them whether such proposals are accepted or not.
(b)
The withdrawal of Chiang Kai-shek and a small number of his henchmen to Canton or elsewhere in China proper in a die-hard attempt to continue the war. Although this is compatible with Chiang Kai-shek’s present mood and would suit those members of the Kuomintang10 whose fate is linked with his, it is doubtful whether the essential quota of Government servants would be able or willing to follow. In any event he and his associates are now so completely discredited in the eyes of the people that their continued existence as a shadow Government would be entirely dependent on American support, which would have to be much more extensive than anything so far undertaken. A withdrawal by Chiang Kai-shek to Formosa would hardly affect the course of events on the mainland.

Of the above alternatives the first is likely to be the more welcome to the Communists, since it would give them control over Nanking and Shanghai without driving away the administration and financial elements, which they would find it difficult to replace from their own resources. Further, if they attach importance to the international position they would thus step overnight into the controlling position in a recognised government. To the extent that they are guided by Moscow they may be encouraged to pursue this policy with a view to strengthening the opposition to the Western Democracies in the United Nations.

Much has been written which suggests that the Chinese Communists are Communists only in name. Justification for this view lies in the fact that up to the present there has been no need for Moscow to take any overt hand in the civil war or for the Chinese Communists to make any appeal to their compatriots save that of relative honesty, relative efficiency, an ostensibly fair deal in the, matter of land reform and above all peace. On the other hand, a careful study of their official pronouncements shows that their leader, General Mao Tse-tung,11 pays [Page 4] at any rate whole-hearted lip service to the Marxist-Leninist philosophy, while the Moscow press has avoided comment on his successes with such scruple over so long a period as to suggest that it is in the interests of Soviet policy not to trouble the pipe dreams of the complacent. Inasmuch as the Communist administration appears to be better disciplined and less corrupt than that of the Central Government, it may well be that if it is their policy to develop and exploit Chinese resources their initial attitude to foreign technical ability and trading interests may be encouraging. It would, however, be highly dangerous to assume that this initial honeymoon period would be likely to ripen into any enduring bond.

It is nevertheless clear that, by whichever means the Communists acquire control of the area south of the Yangtze, they must inherit the economic ills of the land. If they do so by entering a coalition Government the drain on the exchequer from civil war would cease, but it may be assumed that the Central Government has already reached such a degree of insolvency that the advantage of this is likely to be more apparent than real. In our present ignorance of Communist internal policies it is impossible to measure the degree of handicap which this state of affairs will represent, but its existence can hardly fail to induce the Kuomintang’s successors to seek to maintain the country’s export trade in order to pay for her essential imports, and in this connexion some initial benefit to British traders may accrue. Moreover, it is also fair to assume that General Mao Tse-tung will be hard put to it to provide the necessary administration, the more so as the number of his efficient followers is probably limited and will become somewhat thin on the ground when the whole of China falls to be administered. This factor, too, may well tend to shelter British interests for some time from the full force and fury of Communist theory and practice. But of the ultimate intentions of Mao Tse-tung, if he succeeds in surmounting local difficulties, there is little doubt.

In either event the Communists would almost certainly require a fairly lengthy period of preparation and infiltration before moving very far south of the Yangtze. Even in the absence of any coherent opposition, therefore, the eventual Communist domination of the whole of China is likely to take some little time. Whether advantage can be taken of the breathing space to create an anti-Communist bloc (for which American aid would be essential) remains to be seen, but as already indicated, the prospects are very doubtful.

Conclusions

(i) In China it can be assumed

(a)
that there will be an immediate period of dislocation when foreign commerce generally will be at a low ebb;
(b)
that there will follow a period in which the economic difficulties of the Communists may dispose them to be tolerant towards foreign trading interests;
(c)
that the present nationalist tendency towards foreign investments and capital installations will thereafter be enhanced and that the intention to work rapidly towards the exclusion of the foreigner will be strengthened;
(d)
that there would be a tendency to subject foreign trade, both import and export, to close government control, which would not altogether suit the types of trade United Kingdom merchants aim at doing in and with China.

British interests in China may be able to carry on at least for a time and His Majesty’s Government will encourage this.

(ii) Political effects on adjacent Areas.

Communist activities in adjacent areas will be increased and the contacts between Communists in these countries will be facilitated. The economic effects in these areas are likely to be an increase in labour troubles and disturbances in the production of vital commodities.

Recommendations

(a)
That His Majesty’s Government should consult with the Governments of the United States, the British Commonwealth, France, Netherlands, Burma and Siam as to the best means of containing the Communist threat to our several interests.
(b)
That all necessary steps should be taken to strengthen our position in colonial territories in the area.
(c)
That we should consider, in consultation with friendly Powers whether the economic weakness of Communist-dominated China might not offer an opportunity to secure reasonable treatment for our interests.
  1. Ernest Bevin, British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
  2. infra.
  3. Not attached to file copy.
  4. Hubert A. Graves, Counselor of the British Embassy.
  5. Chinese Nationalist Party.
  6. Chairman of the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).