740.00119 Control (Japan)/5–1049
The Chargé in Japan (Huston)1 to the Secretary of State
No. 298
[Received May 20.]
Subject: Launching of Program to Effect Relaxation of Occupation in Japan
Sir: I have the honor to report that on May 9, 1949, General Headquarters here initiated measures looking to a progressive relaxation of the controls exercised by the Occupation vis-à-vis the Japanese Government [Page 741] and its agencies. On that date the Chief of Staff, Major General Edward M. Almond, called a meeting of all chiefs of Headquarters’ staff sections, as well as his two deputies (SCAP and FEC), and directed them to inaugurate immediately an intensive review of all Scapins (SCAP instructions), verbal orders, and other directives to the Japanese Government with a view to determining those which might be eliminated or modified. Reports are to be submitted by May 23 to the Deputy Chief of Staff (SCAP), who will prepare a consolidated report for submission to the Chief of Staff by May 30. All Scapins and other directives are to be placed in three categories, i.e., (a) those which must be continued, (b) those which may be modified, and (c) those which may be withdrawn, justification to be provided for all directives which the section chiefs feel must be continued in present or modified form.
Making it clear that he was taking this action at the express direction of the Supreme Commander, General Almond stated that the general program of relaxing controls to which Headquarters had been devoted for some time might now be considered as having passed from an “implied” to an “expressed” stage. He noted that the determination to relax Occupation controls had been clearly expressed in General MacArthur’s message on the second anniversary of the Japanese Constitution on May 3, which, after attributing the long duration of the Occupation to “events and circumstances elsewhere beyond your capacity to influence or control”, indicated the Supreme Commander’s purpose to reduce restrictions on Japan’s autonomy in the following words:
“In these two years the character of the Occupation has gradually changed from the stern rigidity of a military operation to the friendly guidance of a protective force. While insisting upon the firm adherence to the course delineated by existing Allied policy and directive, it is my purpose to continue to advance this transition just as rapidly as you are able to assume the attending autonomous responsibility. Thus progressive latitude will come to you in the stewardship of your own affairs.”
A copy of the full text of General MacArthur’s message is enclosed herewith.
Stressing the characterization of the present period of the Occupation as one of “economic rehabilitation”, General Almond declared that the time had come when it was imperative to take practical and effective measures to accord the degree of control exercised by Occupation authorities with the fact that the Occupation had passed from the “stern rigidity of a military operation to the friendly guidance of a protective force”. Prepared forms were then distributed, and the Acting Deputy Chief of Staff (SCAP) explained that each section chief should direct his staff to review all Scapins and other directives [Page 742] of all kinds, including standing verbal orders, requests for information, required reports, directives affecting Japan’s autonomy or administration, and any other instruments of control. The reports are also required to cite any areas of conflicting, duplicating, or overlapping interest as between sections in various fields.
A general air of willing cooperation prevailed among the section chiefs, although Major General William F. Marquat, Chief of ESS (Economic and Scientific Section), on which a major burden will fall in the preparation of these reports, rose to point out the particular difficulties with which he would be faced in undertaking this tremendous task and at the same time carrying on his other work under the multitudinous directives calling upon him to implement the present intensive program of economic rehabilitation. Brigadier General Courtney Whitney, Chief of Government Section, remarked that his section had “issued no directives during the past two years”.
Some 17,000 Scapins and other directives have been issued to the Japanese Government during the period of the Occupation. A large number of these, of course, are now obsolete or inoperative, many of them having been “one-time Scapins” dealing with a single case or operation. It is accordingly obvious that the present program will be able to show impressive results as a matter of adjusted records with respect to the number of Scapins and other directives now in effect, as a great majority of them can simply be struck out as presently inoperative. This will not mean, however, that such clearance of the records can be taken as representing any real relaxation of controls now in existence. The test will come when the various section chiefs determine which of the presently operative controls for which they are responsible can be relinquished and which must be continued, and the effectiveness of the program will be finally determined by the action taken by the Chief of Staff and, ultimately, the Supreme Commander on the various justifications submitted.
This Mission has been responsible for the issuance of very few Scapins, and these have in virtually every instance been of a permissive or informative, rather than a controlling character; they include, for example, authorization for Japan to participate in certain international conferences, permission for Japanese to file claims in the United States for the release and return of vested property, authorization for the Japanese authorities to correspond with Japanese nationals abroad, and similar directives of a character which places no limitations on Japan’s autonomy.
This meeting, which, whether eventually productive of the desired results or not, seems to reflect an honest recognition in General Headquarters of the need for a genuine relaxation of controls and the progressive transfer of responsibilities to the Japanese Government, coincided in point of time with the week-end appearance in the press [Page 743] of news stories regarding the Department’s announcement of May 6 that it had recommended to the Far Eastern Commission the transfer to Japan of increased control of its own affairs in the international and domestic fields (see Mission’s A–115 of May 11, 1949).2
Respectfully yours,