831.01/12–2848: Circular telegram
The Acting Secretary of State to Diplomatic Representatives in the American Republics
Deptcirtel Dec 16 quoted language US contemplated including note to Ven FonMin if and when normal relations resumed. As result further consideration and exchange views we are considering altering text to read as follows:
“My Govt has noted Y.E.’s statement that new administration will strictly fulfill its international obligations. It has also noted passage in address delivered Nov 26 by H.E. Pres. of Junta in which stated new Govt will prepare for elections in which all citizens will participate under conditions of equality.”
Remainder same as given Deptcirtel Dec 16.
Omitted from revised text is resumé of remarks by Pres Junta to effect Junta has not assumed power as an attempt against democratic principles but in order to secure their effective application. It has been pointed out repetition such statement in note might be taken as acceptance by this Govt of Junta’s interpretation its purpose in overthrowing previous Govt.
Of Govts consulted only Mexico has indicated disapproval inclusion such language in note resuming relations which it considers would savor intervention internal affairs. Some other Govts propose omission from note but public statement in similar sense. Mexico, Cuba, Guatemala and Uruguay have indicated will delay resumption relations indefinitely. Several other Govts which have not resumed relations of opinion important question now is when to resume relations. Chil FonMin considers delay should be sufficient attract attention and cause concern those contemplating similar coups. US considers following have made our disapproval impressive: (1) several weeks elapsed since Nov 24 seizure, without resumption relations; (2) exchange of views among Amer Reps on general question de facto Govts; (3) public statements by US and Chile condemning coups; (4) language US, Chile and perhaps others propose including in notes resuming relations; (5) publicity to be given such notes.
Net effect exchange views strengthen Dept’s position non-recognition not suitable instrument for strengthening democratic framework. Careful consideration being given several other suggestions recd.