501.BC Greece/8–647: Telegram
The United States Representative at the United Nations (Austin) to the Secretary of State
urgent
712. Re Greek case. There now exists a general feeling of frustration on the part of several friendly SC members. Foreseeing a second veto on whatever resolution is introduced under Chapter 7, they do not know which way to turn and do not readily see the necessity of supporting a Chapter 7 case even as a build-up for GA action. In the light of the anticipated veto, they are inclined to regard Chapter 7 case as essentially a useless act. This skepticism might be modified if they were told with more precision what further steps US is prepared to take.
Accordingly, I do not propose to introduce the resolution contained in Deptel 3371 until further development of discussion in SC. Furthermore, as there is apparent necessity of persuading other members to support US position, I do not propose to encourage acceleration of debate or of frequent meetings on case for the moment unless there is drastic deterioration in situation on Greek frontier.
In an effort to persuade friendly members of SC, I propose to use the following arguments:
- (1).
- In event of second veto the US is prepared to press case in GA. Accordingly maximum majority in SC in Chapter 7 phase is essential to mobilize world opinion as to seriousness of case against Albania, Bulgaria and Yugoslavia and thus to further case in GA.
- (2).
- Precise action to be urged in GA by US will depend on developments in area; probable minimum would be proposing the substance of the US resolution already vetoed and the one contained in Deptel 337, August 5.
- (3).
- In intervening period before GA meets, SC should refuse to dissolve Subsidiary Group and Commission.
It may be necessary in order to persuade some delegates to indicate what further action we might be prepared to take in GA. Are we authorized to tell them that if assistance to guerrillas does not cease US would consider pressing for severance of diplomatic relations and perhaps more serious measures indicated in Article 41.
In my view, Department should reach policy decision, promptly that US will be willing to press strong case in GA including, if developments warrant, measures indicated in Article 41. If such decision is reached, consultation should commence forthwith on when-as-and-if [Page 880] basis to line up the GA members so that necessary two-thirds majority will be forthcoming.
I should appreciate Department’s reaction to this proposed course.
- Supra.↩