811.24596/8–2746: Telegram
The Ambassador in the Philippines (McNutt) to the Secretary of State
[Received August 27—1:35 a.m.]
246. Mytel 242, August 26.71 Although language some parts Department’s draft military base agreement suggest mere executive [Page 904] agreement intended, other sections indicate formal treaty. At any rate President Philippines considers he cannot commit his government without consent Philippine Senate. This being so, presume US Senate must also advise consent ratification. If this presumption correct, please instruct regarding rewording article 29 your draft. If not, please explain how ratification unnecessary our end for communication to Philippine Government.72
- Not printed.↩
- In telegram 310, September 6, 6 p.m., to Manila, the Department replied that it contemplated an executive agreement, which the President had been authorized to conclude in joint resolution approved June 29, 1944 (Public Law 380, 79th Congress). The Department added, “If Roxas decides ratification Phil Cong necessary, you are authorized delete ‘signature’ in Art 29 and insert ‘acceptance by both Governments’.” (811.24596/8–2746)↩