767.68119/10–346: Telegram
The Chargé in Turkey (Bursley) to the Secretary of State
[Received October 4—3:51 a.m.]
1066. British Ambassador on instruction saw Erkin today stating:
On account important issues involved, views British Govt available only next week after Bevin consults Secretary. It is advisable for Turk Govt have US-UK views before replying but if they must proceed it is suggested they avoid curt reply to moderate Soviet Straits note and especially refrain from categorical refusal discuss points 4 and 5 in an international conference. Latter not because British in disagreement objections those points but because of use Soviets might make of refusal Turks to go to international conference which would discuss them. Idea is that while those fully familiar with matter would understand, world opinion and [also?] opinion in UK-US, with Soviets getting in first word, might react adversely to Turks’ refusal. Unfortunately worded note might cause Soviets take unilateral action.
[Page 871]Erkin told Ambassador his first draft about 25 pages (seems reply now planned won’t be short). Draft to be shown British Ambassador and me won’t be ready until Saturday.
Secretary General told British Ambassador he might be able draft so as accept attend international conference basis first three points. Ambassador said to him that would seem take care first four points since international conference would mean attendance more than Black Sea powers. Erkin seemed less clear how avoid rejection outright point 5. Ambassador said it was largely question language and Turks should follow more or less line previous Turk note.
On question time reply Erkin indicated ability delay day or two.
To Dept as 1066, to Paris as 100.