Memorandum by the Secretary of State to President Roosevelt 20

Last week in a conversation21 which I had with the British Ambassador he stated that, according to information from his Foreign Office, you had spoken rather definitely during your recent trip of your views concerning the future of French Indo-China. According to Lord Halifax’ information you had expressed the opinion that Indo-China should be taken away from the French and administered by an international trusteeship.22 He wondered whether this represented your final conclusions and attached importance to the matter in view of the fact that reports of your alleged conversations would undoubtedly get back to the French. I informed the Ambassador that I did not know whether you had come to any final conclusions on the subject and added that, in my judgment, you and Mr. Churchill would find it desirable to talk this matter over fully, deliberately, and perhaps finally at some future stage.

[Page 770]

As of possible interest to you I am enclosing two brief memoranda citing the more important public statements or commitments by ourselves and the British with regard to the future of French territory after the war.

C[ordell] H[ull]
[Enclosure 1]

United States Position With Respect to French Territory After the War

During the past three years there have been a number of public pronouncements, as well as unpublished statements, by the President, the Secretary of State, and other high ranking officials of this Government regarding the future of French territory after the war. The most important of these pronouncements and statements are set forth below.

1. In a statement issued on August 2, 1941, concerning the agreement entered into between the French and Japanese Governments regarding French Indochina, the Secretary of State said:23

“This Government, mindful of its traditional friendship for France, has deeply sympathized with the desire of the French people to maintain their territories and to preserve them intact. In its relations with the French Government at Vichy and with the local French authorities in French territories, the United States will be governed by the manifest effectiveness with which those authorities endeavor to protect these territories from domination and control by those powers which are seeking to extend their rule by force and conquest, or by the threat thereof.” (Department of State Press Release No. 374)

2. In a letter to Marshal Petain in December, 1941,24 President Roosevelt stated that so long as “French sovereign control remains in reality purely French” the American Government has no desire to see existing French sovereignty over French North Africa or any of the French colonies “pass to the control of any other nation”.

3. A State Department press release of March 2, 194225 (No. 85) relative to the situation in New Caledonia, included the following words:

“The policy of the Government of the United States as regards France and French territory has been based upon the maintenance of [Page 771] the integrity of France and of the French empire and of the eventual restoration of the complete independence of all French territories.”

The above statement was qualified by the following words:

“In its relations with the local French authorities in French territories the United States has been and will continue to be governed by the manifest effectiveness with which those authorities endeavor to protect their territories from domination and control by the common enemy.”

4. In a note of April 13, 1942,26 to the French Ambassador at Washington, relative to the establishing of an American consular establishment at Brazzaville, the Acting Secretary of State said:

“The Government of the United States recognizes the sovereign jurisdiction of the people of France over the territory of France and over French possessions overseas. The Government of the United States fervently hopes that it may see the reestablishment of the independence of France and of the integrity of French territory.”

5. At his press conference on May 21, 1942, in reply to an inquiry as to whether the United States considered itself bound to the restoration of the whole French Empire after the war, the Secretary of State said that this question had not arisen.

6. In an unpublished letter of November 2, 1942, to General Giraud, the President’s Personal Representative, Mr. Murphy, wrote:

“It is thoroughly understood that French sovereignty will be reestablished as soon as possible throughout all the territory, metropolitan and colonial, over which flew the French flag in 1939.”

7. The landing of American forces in North Africa on November 8, 1942,27 was the occasion for a number of assurances to the French people regarding American motives. Among them were the following:

In his message to Marshal Pétain28 the President said:

“I need not tell you that the ultimate and greater aim is the liberation of France and its empire from the Axis yoke.”

The President’s message29 to Admiral Esteva, Resident General at Tunis, concluded with these words:

“I know that I may count on your understanding of American friendship for France and American determination to liberate the French empire from the domination of its oppressors.”

[Page 772]

In his broadcast to the French people on November 830 the President said:

“We assure you that once the menace of Germany and Italy is removed from you, we shall quit your territory at once.”

8. The preamble of the unpublished Clark-Darlan Agreement of November 22, 1942,31 contains the following words:

“It has been agreed by all French elements concerned and United States military authorities that French forces will aid and support the forces of the United States and their allies to expel from the soil of Africa the common enemy, to liberate France and restore integrally the French Empire.”

[Enclosure 2]

British Position With Respect to French Territory After the War

Prime Minister Churchill has more than once expressed the desire to see France, including Alsace-Lorraine, restored, and both Mr. Churchill and Mr. Eden32 have repeatedly denied any territorial ambitions on the part of Great Britain with respect to the French Empire.

1. On June 10, 1941, the Prime Minister assured the House of Commons33 that

“We have no territorial designs in Syria or anywhere else in French territory”;

and subsequently, on November 10, 1942, he said:34

“For ourselves we have no wish but to see France free and strong, with her empire gathered round her and with Alsace-Lorraine restored. We covet no French territory. We have no acquisitive designs or ambitions in North Africa or any other part of the world.”

These commitments, however, are not interpreted by the British Government as including any guarantee of particular frontiers or of the integrity of the French Empire. The British Foreign Secretary, in a letter to the American Ambassador on November 16, 1942,35 stated:

“You will see that we have taken care to avoid guaranteeing the integrity of the French Empire and have concentrated upon asserting our intention to restore ‘the independence and greatness of France’ and denying any desire to annex French territory”.

[Page 773]

Much earlier, in connection with his note of August 7, 1940, to General de Gaulle, Mr. Churchill, in an unpublished letter of the same date, had said:

“I think it necessary to put on record that the expression ‘full restoration of the independence and greatness of France’ has no precise relation to territorial frontiers. We have not been able to guarantee such frontiers in respect of any nation now acting with us, but, of course, we shall do our best.”

2. Like the United States, the British Government has made a number of commitments relative to the maintenance of French sovereignty in North Africa, and on March 17, 1943, the Lord Privy Seal stated in the House of Lords36 that

“North Africa is French territory”;

and

“The relationship of the British and United States Commanders is not that of an occupying power toward the local authority of an occupied region”.

  1. Copy of memorandum obtained from the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library, Hyde Park, N.T.
  2. For extract of memorandum of this conversation, dated January 3, 1944, see Foreign Relations, The Conferences at Cairo and Tehran, 1943, p. 864.
  3. A memorandum of July 21, 1943, obtained from the Franklin D. Roosevelt Library at Hyde Park, N.Y., records a statement by President Roosevelt in the thirty-third meeting of the Pacific War Council that Indochina should be placed under a trusteeship until it was ready for independence.
  4. For complete text of statement, see Department of State Bulletin, August 2, 1941, p. 87.
  5. For text of letter of December 27, 1941, see Foreign Relations, 1941, vol. ii, p. 205.
  6. Department of State Bulletin, March 7, 1942, p. 208.
  7. Foreign Relations, 1942, vol. ii, p. 561.
  8. For correspondence concerning the landings of November 8, 1942, see ibid., pp. 429432.
  9. Department of State Bulletin, November 14, 1942, pp. 904, 905.
  10. Ibid., p. 908.
  11. Department of State Bulletin, November 14, 1942, p. 892.
  12. Foreign Relations, 1942, vol. ii, p. 453.
  13. Anthony Eden, British Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs.
  14. Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, 5th series, vol. 372, col. 157.
  15. For entire text of speech, see the London Times, November 11, 1942, p. 8.
  16. Not printed.
  17. See Parliamentary Debates, House of Lords, 5th series, vol. 126, col. 737.