859.01/7–1044

The British Embassy to the Department of State

Memorandum

In view of the Soviet Government’s objections, His Majesty’s Government feel that it necessary to abandon the idea of a joint declaration on Denmark.

2.
As however, the King of Denmark has been led by an earlier secret exchange of communications with him to expect some such declaration, His Majesty’s Government propose, subject to the State Department’s concurrence,49 to send him through the same secret channel a message of which the text will be found in Annex A.
3.
It will be seen that the final sentence of that message refers to a further public statement. This Mr. Eden proposes to make in the form of a reply to an inspired Parliamentary question. Text of proposed question and the answer are given in Annex B.50
4.
His Majesty’s Government have been instructed in informing the State Department to ask for their early views on the proposed message to the King of Denmark. The Danish Minister in London will not be informed until the message has been sent.
5.
His Majesty’s Government would also be grateful if they could be informed in the event that the United States Government decide to issue a statement on Denmark similar to that which is proposed by Mr. Eden.
Annex “A”

On receipt of Your Majesty’s reply welcoming message from His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom regarding proposed declaration on Denmark, His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom and United States Government submitted text to Soviet Government and invited their participation as proposed.

Soviet Government have however declined to subscribe to it on the grounds that the Danish Government broke off relations with Soviet Union in 1941.

As it has proved impossible to reach agreement with the Soviet Government, His Majesty’s Government and United States Government have been compelled to abandon suggested tripartite declaration. His Majesty’s Government, however, still wish to acknowledge Denmark’s contribution to the cause of the United Nations.

Your Majesty will already have been informed of the friendly reference to Denmark contained in the Prime Minister’s speech in the House of Commons on May 2451 in which Mr. Churchill alluded to close ties between our two countries. His Majesty’s Government will find an early opportunity of making a further public statement giving clear expression to their friendly disposition towards Denmark.

Annex “B”

Question

To ask Secretary of State whether his attention has been drawn to appointment of a Free Danish Representative at Moscow and whether he can enlighten this House on the international position of Denmark.

Answer

Yes, Sir, I am glad to note that Free Denmark is now represented in Soviet Union as well as in this country and in the United States. [Page 553] It is the policy of His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom to support all those who help in the fight against the enemy—Denmark is an enemy-occupied country. Her King regards himself a prisoner of the Germans and his Government ceased to function last August. It is not therefore possible at present for Denmark to become formally belligerent and join the United Nations. But it is clear that the people of Denmark as a whole are inspired by the ideals of the United Nations, many Danes are actively engaged in the ranks of the United Nations for the liberation of their country, and inside Denmark ever increasing active resistance is contributing to the common struggle against the Axis.

Last autumn the representatives of various resistance bodies in Denmark formed a Committee with the name of Council of Freedom, which, pending the restoration of liberty and constitutional government to Denmark, played a conspicuous part in the life of occupied Denmark as a focus of resistance to the Germans. The valuable contribution which is being made to defeat Germany by the work of Danish Council of Freedom and by all who contribute to resistance in Denmark is, like that of Free Danes abroad, acknowledged with admiration by His Majesty’s Government.

  1. The British Embassy was informed orally on July 11 that the Department had no objections to the British sending the message, and that the Secretary of State would also make a statement on July 12 (post, p. 553.)
  2. Statement printed as Annex B was made in House of Commons on July 12; see Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, 5th series, vol. 401, col. 1717.
  3. For text, see Parliamentary Debates, House of Commons, 5th series, vol. 400, cols. 771–781.