835.5151/942

The Ambassador in Argentina (Weddell) to the Secretary of State

No. 2239

Sir: I have the honor to transmit a confidential communication addressed to me under date of October 4 by Consul General Davis, setting forth a conversation held by him with the Chief of the Argentine Exchange Control Office in which a possible trade agreement with the United States, and also the possibility of a dollar loan to be floated in New York, were discussed.

Respectfully yours,

Alexander W. Weddell
[Page 308]
[Enclosure]

The Consul General at Buenos Aires (Davis) to the Ambassador in Argentina (Weddell)

Sir: I have the honor, with reference to the Consulate General’s despatch to the Embassy of August twenty-fifth and previous reports from this office based on information obtained informally from Mr. Louro, to submit the following brief outline of points brought up in a conversation yesterday. A more detailed report will follow.

According to the source mentioned, the Argentine Government is about to enter a new active phase of study of a possible trade agreement with the United States. While no country committee has as yet been formed, a general commercial policy committee charged with the broader aspects of the questions involved is now functioning and will probably recommend the personnel of a country committee shortly. Most of Argentina’s recent “trade agreements” have been in actual fact little more than exchange agreements and the question of reducing tariffs has not been given much consideration. The Argentine Government will therefore have to create an organization to supply this lack, and is studying the American Trade Agreements “set up” with this end in view.

Mr. Louro is preparing a report to his Government on the results of the trade agreements program in the United States and also on Argentina’s present trade orientation and the country’s international commercial tendencies. He is comparing Argentina’s present system of trade treaties with the United States program and apparently attempting to find points of reconciliation which might be made the basis of an agreement between the two countries. Inevitably he will contrast with the American program the operation of compensation agreements such as that with Germany. Under the latter system Argentina’s sales are determined entirely by the measure of its purchases from Germany and supposedly there is no limit to the possibilities of expansion as long as Argentina is willing to absorb increased amounts of German products. His report therefore will discuss among other questions the extent to which the increased absorption of German goods is possible or desirable from the point of view of the consumers, the general economy and Argentina’s international relations. Mr. Louro said the question of credits will be raised also, and that a point in favor of the United States may be made in this connection.

On the subject of the exchange question Mr. Louro stated that he was about to recommend to his Government that it offer the United States 9½ per cent of the total official exchange created by exports as a basis for opening trade agreement negotiations. He considered [Page 309] that the agreement of the United States to this percentage, with the understanding that other merchandise would be allowed to be cleared through the “free market” as heretofore, would be decidedly to its advantage, especially as under a quota system the United States might be considerably worse off than it is now. The present system, with the existence of the “free market” for non-prior-permit imports, at least has the merit of flexibility, which of course a quota system would not have.

The Argentine Government, judging by remarks of both Mr. Louro and Mr. Irigoyen, has been studying the question of making up the loss of revenue incident to the possible reduction of customs duties on automobiles by increasing gasoline taxes and the internal taxes on licenses. It is believed that a decision has now been made to the effect that Argentina would be able to accept the United States proposals for a reduction of certain tariff items on automotive products. Thus it appears that a method of overcoming the fiscal difficulty, which was considered an important stumbling-block some months ago, has been found.

As to the dollar loan, in connection with which a further delaying amendment has been filed, extending the time-limit to October tenth, Mr. Louro stated that officials of the Ministry of Finance were most optimistic about the prospects of its flotation. There was no question but that the Argentine Government needed the money, and he appeared to consider it probable that the New York underwriters’ terms would be accepted, provided they were no less favorable than the offer of last August; namely, ninety-two. He added, however, that only the Finance Minister would really be able to answer this question.

Respectfully yours,

Monnett B. Davis