611.6831/190

The Secretary of State to the Minister in Greece (MacVeagh)

No. 454

Sir: With reference to the Department’s instruction No. 445 of March 8, 1938, concerning Greek-American trade relations, there is enclosed herewith the new draft modus vivendi which it is requested that you submit to the Greek Minister for Foreign Affairs under cover of an appropriate note of transmission.

The new draft modus vivendi, which embodies the same principles of policy as contained in the text of the draft which was proposed in your note to the Greek Minister for Foreign Affairs on July 19, 1937, is designed to secure, for the trade between the United States and Greece, mutual equality of treatment in respect of all forms of trade control measures. The following observations may be useful in the clarification of those provisions of the new modus vivendi which are designed specifically to accomplish this objective.

Article I embodies the general most-favored-nation clause and except for the addition of the word “taxation” after the word “sale” in the seventh line, the Article is identical with paragraph 2 of the proposed draft of July 19, 1937. The provisions of this Article are designed primarily to assure to each country equality of treatment with third countries in the application and administration of customs duties [Page 524] and other charges imposed on or in connection with the importation or exportation of merchandise.

The provisions of Article II are designed to insure, as nearly as possible, the equivalent of most-favored-nation treatment with respect to the importation of goods subject to quantitative restrictions. The provisions of this Article differ in certain respects from and are somewhat more flexible than the corresponding provisions of the modus vivendi previously proposed to the Greek Government.

The first section of the Article provides for a generally-recognized application of the most-favored-nation principle, in the broadest possible terms, to quantitative restrictions. The second section of the Article is intended to prevent quantitative restrictions from being administered by either Government as an instrument for diverting or canalizing trade at the expense of the other country and provides, at the option of the country which imposes the restriction, for two alternative methods of procedure. The first method, which is described in sub-paragraph (a) would, in effect, involve the imposition of a global quota on imports from all sources without any restriction on the share of this quota which may be supplied by the other country. The second method, which is provided in sub-paragraph (b), involves the allotment of shares among the various exporting countries and provides that the share allotted to the other country party to the agreement shall be, as nearly as may be determined, the same as the relative share which it would supply in the absence of quantitative restrictions.

The method of determining allotments which is provided for in sub-paragraph (b) differs in form from paragraph 3 of the proposed modus vivendi of July 19, 1937, which provided that the country which adopts import restrictions shall allot to the other country a share of the total permitted importations equivalent to the share of the total importations supplied by the other country in some previous representative period. The present Article avoids laying down this formula, which may in some cases be unduly rigid and in others unduly ambiguous, but states the purpose which underlies any such formula, namely, that the share allotted to the other country shall be equivalent to the relative share which would be supplied by it in the absence of quantitative restrictions. In addition, it sets forth certain factors which must be taken into consideration in determining this share.

The provisions of Article III approach the problem of exchange control in a different manner than that contained in paragraph 5 of the proposed modus vivendi of July 19, 1937. In this connection your attention is called to the fourth paragraph of the Department’s instruction No. 392 of May 24, 1937.20 The Department now feels that, if possible, the new provision on exchange control should be incorporated [Page 525] in the proposed modus vivendi. Article III provides that exchange shall be granted without restriction, at a uniform rate with respect to both products and countries, in payment for all goods permitted to be imported subsequent to the effective date of the modus vivendi. Its purpose is to prevent the accumulation of blocked balances in connection with such products as are actually imported from the other country. It means that exchange control shall not be used for the purpose of controlling, directly or indirectly, the volume of goods imported from the other country. Any quantitative regulation of imports from the other country must be in accordance with the provisions of Article II. In effect, the new exchange provision transfers the full burden of insuring non-discriminatory treatment with respect to both quantitative restrictions and exchange control measures to the quota article.

The first paragraph of Article IV is designed to insure to the other country a fair and equitable share of the market if the government of one country establishes or maintains a monopoly for the importation or sale of a particular commodity or grants exclusive privileges to an agency to import or sell a particular commodity. This article is an application of the principles outlined in the section on monopolies contained in the note which you presented to the Greek Minister for Foreign Affairs on July 19, 1937. This Article in no way affects the right of either country to maintain or expand a monopoly régime; its sole purpose is to guard against arbitrary diversion of trade on other than purely economic grounds.

The second paragraph provides for most-favored-nation treatment with respect to government purchases generally, but does not prevent either Government from giving preference to its own nationals with respect to such purchases.

Your attention is called to the fact that the provisions of Articles III and IV were included in the temporary commercial arrangement concluded between the United States and Italy on December 16, 1937,21 a copy of which is enclosed.

In the event that Article III of the new modus vivendi proves to be unacceptable to the Greek Government you are authorized to substitute therefor the provisions of paragraph 5 of the modus vivendi of July 19, 1937. If Article IV of the new modus vivendi proves to be unacceptable to the Greek Government you are authorized to withdraw that Article in its entirety.

If the text of the new modus vivendi contains passages that are obscure to you or provisions which in your opinion should be altered you should withhold action and consult with the Department by telegraph. [Page 526] Immediately upon presenting the new modus vivendi to the Minister for Foreign Affairs you should inform the Department of your action by telegram.

Very truly yours,

For the Secretary of State:
Francis B. Sayre
[Enclosure]

Draft Modus Vivendi Between the United States and Greece

Sir: I have the honor to make the following statement of my understanding of the agreement reached through recent conversations held at Athens by representatives of the Government of the United States of America and the Government of the Kingdom of Greece with reference to the treatment which the United States of America shall accord to the commerce of the Kingdom of Greece and which the Kingdom of Greece shall accord to the commerce of the United States of America.

These conversations have disclosed a mutual understanding between the two Governments which is that the United States of America will accord to the commerce of the Kingdom of Greece and the Kingdom of Greece will accord to the commerce of the United States of America, its territories and possessions, non-discriminatory treatment.

Accordingly the two Governments have agreed upon the following provisions:

I

With respect to customs duties or charges of any kind imposed on or in connection with importation or exportation, and with respect to the method of levying such duties or charges, and with respect to all rules and formalities in connection with importation or exportation, and with respect to all laws or regulations affecting the sale, taxation or use of imported goods within the country, any advantage, favor, privilege or immunity which has been or may hereafter be granted by the United States of America or the Kingdom of Greece to any article originating in or destined for any third country, shall be accorded immediately and unconditionally to the like article originating in or destined for the Kingdom of Greece or the United States of America, respectively.

II

1.
Neither the Government of the United States of America nor the Royal Hellenic Government shall regulate by import licenses or permits the importation into its territory of any article in which the other country has an interest, or by any method maintain limitation [Page 527] or control of the amount of importation of any such article, unless similar action is taken with respect to the importation of such article from all other countries.
2.
If imports of such an article from the other country are, directly or indirectly, restricted by such regulation, limitation, or control, the Government taking such action shall establish in advance, and inform the other Government of, the total amount permitted to be imported from all countries during any specified period, which shall not be shorter than three months, and of any increase in such amount during the specified period, and shall either—
(a)
Impose no limitation on the part of such total amount which may be imported from the other country; or
(b)
Establish in advance, and inform the other country concerning, the quota of such article which shall be permitted to be imported from the other country during the specified period. Such quota shall be, as nearly as may be determined, equivalent to the proportion of the total importation in such period which the other country would supply in the absence of such regulation, limitation, or control. In calculating such quota, account shall be taken of the proportion of the total importation of such article which the other country supplied during previous periods, of the trend of the trade in such article, and, in the case of a quota period shorter than a year, of seasonal variations, if any, in the trade. Where a quota for importation from the other country is established, no obstacle, administrative or otherwise, shall be placed in the way of importation sufficient to fill the quota allotted to the other country. If the total amount permitted entry from all countries is increased during any quota period, the quota established for the other country shall be increased proportionately.
3.
If the Government of either country establishes or maintains such regulation, limitation, or control of the importation of an article in which the other country has an interest, it shall—
(a)
Make public the regulations regarding the issuance of licenses or permits, or regarding any other method of limitation or control, before such regulations are put into force;
(b)
Administer any system of licenses or permits or any other method of limitation or control so as not to discriminate against importation from the other country, and in no manner, directly or indirectly, influence importers regarding the country from which they stall seek permission to import any such article;
(c)
Ensure that there shall be no undue delay in the issuance of licenses or permits;
(d)
Ensure that any importer seeking to establish new, or to re-establish old, trade connections with the other country, or to maintain such trade connections, shall be given reasonable opportunity to import any such article; and upon request inform any such importer hose application is rejected of the reasons for such rejection;
(e)
At all times upon request advise the Government of the other country of the amount of any such article, the growth, produce, or [Page 528] manufacture of each exporting country which has been imported, or for which licenses or permits for importation have been granted.
4.
The provisions of this Article shall also be applicable with respect to any regulation, limitation, or control imposed by either Government upon the importation of such article at a particular rate of duty or charge.

III

In the event that the Government of the United States of America or the Royal Hellenic Government establishes or maintains, directly or indirectly, any form of control of the means of international payment, it shall, in the administration of such control:

(a)
Impose no prohibition, restriction, condition, or delay on the transfer of payment for imported articles the growth, produce, or manufacture of the other country, or of payments necessary for and incidental to the importation of such articles;
(b)
Accord unconditionally, with respect to rates of exchange and taxes or surcharges on exchange transactions in connection with payments for or payments necessary and incidental to the importation of all articles the growth, produce, or manufacture of the other country, treatment no less favorable than that accorded in connection with the importation of any article whatsoever the growth, produce, or manufacture of any third country; and
(c)
Accord unconditionally, with respect to all rules and formalities applying to exchange transactions in connection with payments for or payments necessary and incidental to the importation of articles the growth, produce, or manufacture of the other country, treatment no less favorable than that accorded in connection with the importation of the like articles the growth, produce, or manufacture of any third country.

IV

1.
In the event that the Government of the United States of America or the Royal Hellenic Government establishes or maintains a monopoly for the importation, production, or sale of a particular commodity or grants exclusive privileges, formally or in effect, to one or more agencies to import, produce, or sell a particular commodity, the Government of the country establishing or maintaining such monopoly, or granting such monopoly privileges, agrees that in respect of the foreign purchases of such monopoly or agency the commerce of the other country shall receive fair and equitable treatment. To this end it is agreed that in making its foreign purchases of any product such monopoly or agency will be influenced solely by those considerations, such as price, quality, marketability, and terms of sale, which would ordinarily be taken into account by a private commercial enterprise interested solely in purchasing such product on the most favorable terms.
2.
It is agreed that the Government of each country, in the awarding of contracts for public works and generally in the purchase of supplies, shall not discriminate against the other country in favor of any third country.

V

1.
The advantages now accorded or which may hereafter be accorded by the United States of America or the Kingdom of Greece to adjacent countries in order to facilitate frontier traffic, and advantages resulting from a customs union to which either the United States of America or the Kingdom of Greece may become a party, shall be excepted from the operation of this Agreement.
2.
It is understood that the advantages now accorded or which may hereafter be accorded by the United States of America, its territories or possessions, the Philippine Islands, or the Panama Canal Zone to one another or to the Republic of Cuba shall be excepted from the operation of this Agreement.
3.
Subject to the requirement that, under like circumstances and conditions, there shall be no arbitrary discrimination by either country against the other country in favor of any third country, the provisions of this Agreement shall not extend to prohibitions or restrictions (1) imposed on moral or humanitarian grounds; (2) designed to protect human, animal or plant life or health; (3) relating to prison-made goods; (4) relating to the enforcement of police or revenue laws.
4.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent the adoption of measures prohibiting or restricting the exportation of gold or silver, or to prevent the adoption of such measures as either Government may see fit with respect to the control of the export or sale for export of arms, ammunition, or implements of war, and, in exceptional circumstances, all other military supplies, and it is agreed, further, that nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prevent the adoption or enforcement of measures relating to neutrality.

VI

The present Agreement shall replace the exchange of notes between the Government of the United States and the Government of the Kingdom of Greece of December 9, 1924, and shall become operative on this . . . . . day of . . . . . , . . . . . , and shall continue in force until superseded by a more comprehensive commercial agreement or by a definitive treaty of commerce and navigation, or until denounced by either country by advance written notice of not less than thirty days.

Accept, Sir, etc., etc.

  1. Foreign Relations, 1937, vol. ii, p. 407
  2. Department of State Executive Agreement Series No. 116, or 51 Stat. 361.