659.116/172

The Minister in Denmark (Owsley) to the Secretary of State

No. 189

Sir: I have the honor to refer to the Department’s telegram No. 4, dated February 21, 2 p.m., 1938, regarding discrimination against American trade, and to inform the Department that by special messenger today, Saturday, May 28, 1938, the Royal Ministry of Foreign Affairs handed to me the reply of the Minister of Foreign Affairs.

As an emergency matter, the original copy which is signed by the Minister is forwarded to the Department in haste to catch the pouch which is leaving today at 1 o’clock. Other and additional copies are being mailed under separate cover.

The reply of the Minister of Foreign Affairs is so lengthy and is in the form of an argument that it is not practicable to send the full contents or even a résumé or summary by telegram.

It is also to be noted that the cost of the telegram would be far in excess of the allotment for telegrams to this Legation.

Respectfully yours,

Alvin Mansfield Owsley
[Enclosure]

The Danish Minister for Foreign Affairs (Munch) to the American Minister (Owsley)

Monsieur le Ministre: In a note of February 23rd, 1938 you have been good enough, acting upon instructions from the Secretary of State of the United States of America, to bring to the attention of the Danish Government certain considerations in regard to the trade between our respective countries and concluding in the declaration that the United States Government, in view of the continued accord by it of most-favoured-nation treatment to Danish products, hopes that the Danish Government will be able to give assurances that American commerce will be accorded non-discriminatory treatment.

After a careful and serious consideration by the Danish authorities of your note and the question especially referred to, i. e. the treatment of the American trade during the existing exchange control, I have the honour to state the following:

As already mentioned in my note of March 29, 19536 it became necessary at the beginning of 1932 for the Danish Government to establish the exchange control as a temporary measure. The consequence of [Page 240] the heavy fall in prices of agricultural products at the beginning of the world crisis was that all countries carried through restrictions against the import of these products. As will be known to you, the national economy of Denmark is chiefly based on the export of agricultural products which constitute three fourths of the total export. If under these circumstances Denmark might hope to maintain the balance of payments and continue to pay instalments and interest of the foreign debt (of which an essential part is placed in the United States), it was an absolute necessity for Denmark to establish an import control. In case Denmark could not any more reckon on selling her products to a similar extent as hitherto, this must inevitably lead to a corresponding reduction of her import of foreign products.

The Danish Exchange Control Law does not discriminate between the different countries, but is applied to the imports from all countries without exception. In accordance with the purpose of this act, the foreign exchange available is first and foremost used for the payment of interest and instalments of Denmark’s foreign debt and for the import of raw materials for the exporting industries and the other industries, so that production, employment and export may be maintained; only what remains when the requirement for raw materials for the production is met, is used for import of manufactured goods.

The Danish Government has endeavoured to administer the act in such a manner that reasonable considerations are given to all quarters. But a certain country to which the export of Danish agricultural products is decisively bound, has made even a reduced import of agricultural products from Denmark dependent upon some reciprocity, so that it has proved inevitable at the practical carrying out of the act to a certain extent to pay regard hereto by issuing import licenses to this country in order to ensure to Denmark the maintenance of her export and thereby her power to pay for her import and to meet her other financial obligations.

The Danish Government has always been animated by the desire to limit as much as possible the extent of the import control exercised. During 1937 a certain improvement occurred in Denmark’s balance of payments and thereby a strengthening of her exchange position. In consequence of this development the Danish Government immediately carried through not unessential facilities in the exchange control. After the passing of the new Exchange Control Law of December 22, 1937, about one third of Denmark’s total import is exempted from restrictions. By this act were transferred to the free list goods—both raw materials and other goods—the total import of which from the United States, apart from grain and feeding stuffs, in 1930 amounted to 20 mill. Kr. In this connection I beg to draw your attention to the fact that the balance of trade between Denmark and [Page 241] the United States in the first three months of 1938 compared with the same period of 1937 shows a development very favourable to the United States. While the export of Danish goods to the United States has fallen from 10,0 mill. Kr. to 5,7 mill. Kr., Denmark’s import from the United States has increased from 17,8 mil. Kr. to 36,6 mill. Kr.

The Danish Government has thus availed itself of the improvement in the exchange situation to introduce at once an alleviation in the system in force and hopes that the development will make it possible to continue by this way—the above-mentioned act provides that not later than the autumn 1938 the list of goods is to be taken up for revision with a view to securing possible further facilities for the trade—but as long as the countries who are the principal purchasers of Danish goods, especially agricultural goods, hold by the principle of reciprocity as the basis of their commercial policy and thus more or less make the possibilities of sale of Danish goods dependent upon Danish purchases, the Danish Government unfortunately does not see its way to abandon the exchange control which enables Denmark to fulfil the obligations she must undertake in order to have her goods sold on her principal markets.

At no time after the introduction of the exchange control the Danish Government has wanted to discriminate against the American import to this country. It is not only the proportionate share in Denmark’s import of the United States of America which has fallen in the period 1931–37, but the same holds good of the import from several other countries and in the case of some of them even to a still higher degree than from the United States. Thus Germany’s share has fallen from 33,6 per cent, to 24 per cent., that of U. S. S. R. from 3,9 per cent, to 0,9 per cent., of France from 3,6 per cent, to 1,2 per cent., of Poland from 2,3 per cent, to 1,0 per cent. and of Czechoslovakia from 1,3 per cent. to 0,7 per cent.

In this connection it should also be noted that several important American export articles, such as benzine, petroleum, solar oil and lubricating oil, the import of which from the United States in 1931 amounted to more than 20 mill. Kr., still are imported to the same extent, but in such a manner that the import now by far the greater part takes place through branches of American firms in the United Kingdom, so that the goods are entered in the Danish statistics as Sported from the latter country.

As will be known to you, the high American customs tariff constitutes a serious impediment to the import of Danish products to the United States. The Danish Government therefore fully appreciates the extension to Danish products of the tariff concessions which the United States have given in their commercial treaties with third countries, [Page 242] whereby it seems to become possible that Danish products to a greater extent than hitherto may gain access to the American market. As will appear from what has been stated above, the main difficulty for Denmark is to procure the necessary amount of foreign exchange, so that the country is compelled to the greatest possible extent to pay for her imports with goods. An increase in the Danish exports to the United States of America will, therefore, place Denmark freer as regards her purchases in the United States.

I need hardly assure you that Denmark whose commercial policy until 1932 for more than one hundred years uninterruptedly was based on a moderate customs tariff administered on the principle of equality, follows the endeavours of the United States Government to reestablish freer and sounder conditions for the international trade with great sympathy and in the hope that they may bear fruit. Just because the Danish Government in principle shares the view of the United States of the basis of the international exchange of goods, it is its desire and intention to give the American commerce a fair and equitable treatment within the existing possibilities which it is beyond its power to alter. With this in view the Danish authorities are willing in concrete cases together with the Legation of the United States—as has already been done in certain cases of late—to go in to the difficulties which might arise for the American export trade and discuss the possibilities of redressing them, and I venture to express the sincere hope that my Government in its efforts in this respect may continuedly count on the collaboration and understanding of the United States Government.

I avail myself [etc.]

T. Munch