393.11/2093
The Secretary of State to Vice President Garner
Sir: On January 6, I received a copy attested by the Secretary of the Senate of Senate Resolution No. 210 of January 5, 1938, which reads as follows:
“Resolved, That the Secretary of State is requested to transmit to the Senate at the earliest practicable time the following information, based upon the latest available statistics: (1) The approximate number of American nationals residing in the Republic of China on or about August 9, 1936, the number temporarily in China on said date, and the number now residing therein; (2) if not inconsistent with the public interest, the approximate number of officers and enlisted personnel of our Army, Navy, and Marine Corps now stationed in said Republic; and (3) the approximate amount of American capital invested in said Republic and the names and addresses of the principal investors.”
In reply:
1. The request for figures giving the approximate number of American nationals residing in the Republic of China on or about August 9, 1936, the number temporarily in China on said date, and the number now residing therein, can be answered only by the use of and the making of certain estimates. The figures available to the Department are approximate figures as of the dates January 1, 1936, January 1, 1937, and November 6, 1937.
- (a)
- On the basis of figures relating to January 1, 1936, and the figures relating to January 1, 1937, it is the Department’s belief that the number of American residents in China as of August 9, 1936, would approximate 10,350.
- (b)
- For the number of American nationals temporarily in China on or about August 9, 1936, there are no figures available. However, there were issued or renewed during the year 1936 for travel in the Far East American passports to the number of 10,636, and it is to be presumed that a considerable number of the persons who received these passport services visited China (or, if residing there, were there or returned thereto) during that year.
- (c)
- With regard to the number of American nationals now residing in the Republic of China, the information available to the Department indicates that in July 1937 at the beginning of the present Sino-Japanese [Page 430] hostilities there were in China approximately 10,500 American nationals; that of this number some 4,600 were evacuated up to November 6; and that there now are in China approximately 6,000 American nationals.
2. With regard to the approximate number of officers and enlisted personnel of our Army, Navy, and Marine Corps stationed in the Republic of China, the United States now has armed forces ashore at three points in China:
| At Peiping (U.S. Marines) | 528 |
| At Tientsin (U.S. Army) | 814 |
| At Shanghai (U.S. Marines) | 2555 |
Of the force of U. S. Marines at Shanghai approximately 1,500 represent reenforcements and relief sent to that port in August 1937 for temporary duty as a result of and in order to cope with problems occasioned by the present emergency situation in the way of protecting American nationals. Approximately 100 of this reenforcement have already been withdrawn.
With regard to the approximate number of officers and enlisted personnel of our Navy stationed in Chinese waters, I am informed by the Navy Department that at this time the total personnel on all United States naval vessels now in Chinese waters is 129 officers and 1671 men, including marines on ships. This personnel is on 13 United States naval vessels, which constitute a part of the United States Asiatic Fleet, based on Manila. The United States Asiatic Fleet comprises 44 vessels, which, with the exception of the flagship, the U. S. S. Augusta, a heavy cruiser, are ships of the lighter categories—destroyers, submarines and gunboats, with certain auxiliary vessels. Of the 44 vessels of the Asiatic Fleet, only 13 are now in Chinese waters and of this 13 only 9, consisting for the most part of small, river gunboats, are on duty exclusively in Chinese waters. These 9 gunboats have a total personnel of 69 officers and 896 men.
3. With regard to the approximate amount of American capital invested in the Republic of China and the names and addresses of the principal investors, the most authoritative information available to the Department of State as to American investments in China is that contained in the statement which the Secretary of Commerce sent to Senator Gerald P. Nye under date January 4, 1938, the text of which is published in the Congressional Record of January 5, pages 63, 64. For convenience of reference there is quoted the first paragraph of the statement furnished by the Secretary of Commerce, reading as follows:
“The latest official figures of American investments abroad on a bycountry basis are those published in the Balance of International Payments of the United States in 1933, pages 53 to 62. Insofar as [Page 431] China is concerned, the total remains practically the same as in 1933—$132,000,000. To this total, for some purposes, may be added (1) approximately $40,000,000 of Chinese obligations that have been in default since the World War; (2) from twenty-five to thirty million dollars to cover the properties of American citizens permanently residing in China; and (3) about $40,000,000 of properties of American missionary and charitable organizations.”
With regard to the names and addresses of the principal American investors, the Department maintains no complete lists of individual American investors in China and is not authoritatively informed as to the amount of the investments of individual firms, societies, or organizations. Professor Charles F. Remer’s book entitled “Foreign Investments in China” (the MacMillan Company, New York, 1933)—which is referred to in the statement of the Secretary of Commerce mentioned above—contains statements that American “business investments” include the investments of 353 different firms, of men in the various professions, and of clubs and similar organizations; that the property of American missions and philanthropic societies includes the investments of over forty Protestant societies, nine Catholic societies or orders, and ten educational, medical, and philanthropic institutions.
It may be considered of interest as a part of the background of general policy to give additional information and comment as follows:
With regard to the U. S. Marine detachment at Peiping and the U. S. Army detachment at Tientsin, the American Government maintains these small detachments—and several other interested governments maintain similar detachments—pursuant to the provisions of the so-called Boxer Protocol of 1901 which was concluded between China and the representatives of the interested governments, including the American Minister to China. The purpose of maintaining these troops is to contribute to the protection of American nationals (including the diplomatic personnel) and, in case of emergency calling for evacuation, making available an armed escort.
With regard to the U. S. Marine detachment at Shanghai, the Government of the United States has since 1927—as have various other governments—maintained in the International Settlement at that port a small detachment of armed forces for the purpose of assisting in protecting the large number of American citizens residing in that area from the dangers incident to serious disorders possibly beyond the control of the local authorities.
With regard to the United States naval vessels in Chinese waters, the Government of the United States has—as have other similarly interested governments—maintained gunboats in Chinese waters since the 1840’s primarily for the purpose of contributing to the protection of American citizens. The authority for stationing naval vessels in [Page 432] Chinese waters is found in the Sino-American Treaty of 1858 and in provisions of somewhat similar treaties between China and other foreign powers which provisions inure to the benefit of the United States through most-favored-nation treatment.
American armed forces in China are there for the protection of American nationals primarily against mobs or other uncontrollable elements. They have no mission of aggression. It has been the, desire and the intention of the American Government to remove these forces when performance of their function of protection is no longer called for, and such remains its desire and expectation. Developments in China during the years immediately preceding the outbreak of the present hostilities between China and Japan afforded the Government of the United States reasonable expectation that the armed forces of this country might soon be withdrawn from China in an orderly way and to the advantage of this and other countries. The normal trend of events, however, was interrupted when fighting broke out and spread to various parts of China.
During the current situation in China—as in various previous situations of emergency—the American armed forces in China have rendered important service in protecting the lives of American nationals, in assisting in evacuating Americans from areas of special danger, and in making possible the maintenance of uninterrupted communication with and for our nationals and our diplomatic and consular establishments in the areas involved.
Confronted by the present emergency situation in the Far East, which is attended by extraordinary hazards to everyone in the affected areas, this Government has endeavored to accord to American nationals in that region appropriate and practicable protection, as the Government of the United States always has done in similar situations in all parts of the world. From approximately 1825 until the outbreak of the Spanish-American War, the United States maintained a squadron of naval vessels in the Mediterranean, primarily for the purpose of according protection in the broadest possible sense to American citizens. Subsequent to the World War, the United States maintained a squadron of naval vessels in European waters for the same general purpose. This squadron was gradually withdrawn. In July, 1936, when civil war developed in Spain there happened to be a number of United States naval vessels cruising in European waters. Because of the hazard to the lives of American nationals in Spain and with a view to facilitating withdrawal of American citizens from that country and rendering needed protection, three of the United States naval vessels then in European waters were sent to Spanish ports; also, a United States Coast Guard cutter which was then in European waters. The United States now maintains three naval vessels in proximity to Spanish [Page 433] waters for the purpose indicated above. Thus what the Government of the United States is doing in China is entirely consistent with long-established policy and practice of the United States and the well-recognized duty of the Government to afford protection to American nationals.
The interest and concern of the United States in the Far Eastern situation, in the European situation, and in situations on this continent are not measured by the number of American citizens residing in a particular country at a particular moment nor by the amount of investment of American citizens there nor by the volume of trade. There is a broader and much more fundamental interest—which is that orderly processes in international relationships be maintained. Referring expressly to the situation in the Far East, an area which contains approximately half the population of the world, the United States is deeply interested in supporting by peaceful means influences contributory to preservation and encouragement of orderly processes. This interest far transcends in importance the value of American trade with China or American investments in China; it transcends even the question of safeguarding the immediate welfare of American citizens in China.
In connection with the problem of affording appropriate protection to Americans in China, there must be kept in mind the fact that we have nationals residing in practically every country of the world and that every year some 200,000 of our citizens go abroad; that these include large numbers of students, teachers, religious leaders, laborers, executives, and merchants, men, women, and children; that the number of Americans proceeding abroad for business purposes is not greater than, is probably less than, the number who go abroad for educational, cultural and philanthropic purposes; and that a policy of abandoning American nationals in any one part of the world would have inevitable and serious repercussions adverse to the legitimate rights of Americans and the legitimate interests of this country in other parts, in most parts, of the world.
In emergency situations such as that which now prevails in the Far East, the Government endeavors to pursue in regard to the question of affording appropriate protection a course based upon calm reason. We endeavor to afford those measures of protection which are called for by and are in accord with the realities of the situation. Since the beginning of the present Chinese-Japanese conflict, this Government and its officers in China have repeatedly and earnestly advised American citizens, in face of dangers incident to situations of danger, to withdraw, and In the present situation we are making every effort to provide safe means whereby they may depart. When situations of acute danger develop or seem likely to [Page 434] develop at particular points, our officers redouble their efforts to effect the safe withdrawal of American citizens from those points. When the situation at particular points becomes more tranquil and less likely to present serious hazard to the lives of American citizens, the course is followed of withdrawing armed forces which may have been sent to those points.
In the present situation in the Far East, the Government of the United States is affording appropriate protection and assistance to American nationals, as this Government always has done. The American Government is also upholding principles, as it has always done. It has asked and is asking that the rights of the United States and the rights of our people be respected, and at the same time it has sought and is seeking to avoid involvement of this country in the disputes of other countries.
The principles which the Government of the United States is following in its international relationships are set forth in the statement which I made on July 16, 1937. A copy of this statement and a copy of a further statement which I made on August 23 are enclosed for convenience of reference.65i We are directing our whole thought and effort toward making effective the policies, especially the policy of peace, in which this country believes and to which it is committed.
I have [etc.]