793.94/2317: Telegram

The Chargé in Japan (Neville) to the Secretary of State

193. The Department’s 200, October 20, 2 p.m. I have received the following note from the Minister for Foreign Affairs:

“I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your note of October 21 in which, under instructions of your Government, you were so good as to call the attention of the Japanese to the obligations assumed by Japan as a signatory of the Treaty for the Renunciation of War.

The Japanese Government highly appreciate the sympathetic concern of the American Government in the maintenance of international peace. Their position bearing on the stipulations of the treaty in question is set forth in the accompanying statement. Entertaining the same earnest hope expressed in your communication under review, the Japanese Government remain unshaken in the belief that a method for resolving by pacific means their present difficulties with China will soon be found upon direct negotiations between the two disputants in the spirit of mutual good will and helpfulness”.

The accompanying statement is as follows:

  • “1. The Japanese Government realize as fully as any other signatories of the Pact of Paris of 1928, the responsibility incurred under the provisions of that solemn pact. They have made it clear on various occasions that the Japanese railway guards in taking military measures in Manchuria since the night of September 18 last have been actuated solely by the necessity of defending themselves, as well as of protecting the South Manchuria Railway and the lives and property of Japanese subjects, against wanton attacks by Chinese troops and armed bands. Nothing is farther from the thoughts of the Japanese Government than to have recourse to war for the solution of their outstanding differences in China.
  • 2. It is their settled aim to compose those differences by all pacific means. In the note of the Japanese Minister for Foreign Affairs to the Chinese Minister at Tokyo, dated October 9,45 the Japanese Government [Page 29] have already declared their readiness to enter into negotiations with the responsible representatives of China for an adjustment of the present difficulties. They still hold the same view. So far as they are concerned, they have no intention whatever of proceeding to any steps that might hamper any efforts intended to assure the pacific settlement of the conflict between Japan and China.
  • 3. On the other hand they have repeatedly called the attention of the Chinese Government to the organized hostile agitation against Japan now in progress in various parts of China. The suspension of all commercial intercourse with Japanese at present in China is in no sense a spontaneous act of individual Chinese. It is enforced by anti-Japanese organizations that have taken the law into their own hands, and are heavily penalizing, even with the threat of capital punishment, any Chinese who may be found disobeying their arbitrary decrees. Acts of violence leveled against Japanese residents also continue unabated in many places under the jurisdiction of the Government of Nanking. It will be manifest to all fair observers of the actual situation that those activities of the anti-Japanese organizations are acquiesced in by the Chinese Government as a means to attain the national ends of China. The Japanese Government desire to point out that such acquiescence by the Chinese Government in the lawless proceedings of their own nationals cannot be regarded as being in harmony with the letter or the spirit of the stipulations contained in article 2 of the Pact of Paris.”

Repeated to Peiping.

Neville
  1. For text, see memorandum from the Japanese Embassy to the Department of State, p. 15.