711.428/1382

The Chargé in Canada (Riggs) to the Acting Secretary of State

No. 1380

Sir: With further reference to the Department’s instruction No. 793 of March 6, 1930, (file No. 711.428/1329), directing me to submit to the Canadian Government an amended draft of the Halibut Convention, together with the Department’s observations regarding suggested changes, I have the honor to transmit herewith copy of the Canadian Government’s reply received today.

It will be noted that the Canadian Government is prepared to accept the draft transmitted in the Department’s instruction under reference, with two very minor changes. The expression “the United States counter-draft”, quoted in the Canadian reply, was used by me in the note to the Department of External Affairs, together with two other similar expressions, for convenience in reference and to avoid the tedious circumlocution which would otherwise have been necessary whenever one of the three drafts under discussion was mentioned.

I understand informally that the Canadian request to London for the full power to sign this Convention was despatched some time ago and that the full power is consequently expected very shortly.

I have [etc.]

B. Reath Riggs
[Enclosure]

The Canadian Secretary of State for External Affairs (Mackenzie King) to the American Chargé (Riggs)

No. 37

Sir: With reference to your note No. 659 of the 12th March, 1930, and to previous correspondence regarding the conclusion of a convention implementing the recommendations contained in the report of the International Fisheries Commission, I have the honour to state that “the United States counter-draft” which accompanied your note under reference is acceptable to the Canadian Government, subject to the two following alterations in the preamble: (1) the insertion of the words “in respect of the Dominion of Canada” after the words “His Majesty the King of Great Britain, Ireland, and the British Dominions beyond the Seas, Emperor of India”, for the purpose of reverting to a formula which had been in use in recent years, and (2) a change in the punctuation relating to the following words “and His Majesty: for the Dominion of Canada:” so as to read “and His Majesty, for the Dominion of Canada:”.

The Canadian Government will be prepared to proceed with the [Page 518] signature of the Instrument embodying that document as soon as the Full Power to be issued by His Majesty the King is received.

It is noted that the Government of the United States are now prepared to request the President to issue to you a Full Power to sign the Convention.

Accept [etc.]

O. D. Skelton

For the Secretary of State for External Affairs