724.3415/623

The Chairman of the Commission of Inquiry and Conciliation ( McCoy ) to the Secretary of State

Sir: I have the honor to transmit herewith for the Department’s information copies of correspondence read into the minutes of the latest meeting of the Commission of Inquiry and Conciliation, Bolivia and Paraguay, on July 2nd, at the Pan American Union, together with the remarks made on the same occasion by Dr. David Alvéstegui of the Bolivian Delegation and by myself as Chairman.

The correspondence and remarks record the proposal and acceptance of a plan whereby the neutral members of the Commission may now proceed toward a final settlement of the fundamental question affecting the Chaco, between Bolivia and Paraguay. The plan does not restrict the Commission in the performance of its duties as defined in the Protocol of January 3, 1929.41

The Department will, doubtless, be gratified to learn that during the negotiations which led to the adoption of this plan the Commissioners of Mexico, Colombia, Uruguay and Cuba lent the indispensable assistance of their united efforts and the prestige of their [Page 864] Governments, and that the delegates of Bolivia and Paraguay, keeping always in mind the interests of their respective Governments, cooperated in the most broadminded way, as members of the Commission.

I have [etc.]

Frank McCoy
[Enclosure 1—Translation]

Draft Note From the Chairman of the Commission of Inquiry and Conciliation ( McCoy ) to the Delegations of Bolivia and Paraguay 42

Excellencies: On May 31st last, the undersigned had the honor to make to Your Excellencies, through His Excellency Dr. David Alvéstegui (Dr. Enrique Bordenave), as well as to their Excellencies the Commissioners of Paraguay (of Bolivia), through His Excellency Dr. Enrique Bordenave (Dr. David Alvéstegui), the following statement:

The neutral Commissioners consider it indispensable, in order to prevent further conflicts and establish conciliation on firm and permanent bases, to procure a settlement of the fundamental question between the two countries. They trust that Their Excellencies the Commissioners of Bolivia and Paraguay (of Paraguay and Bolivia), duly empowered by their Governments, authorize the neutral Commissioners to prepare in a spirit of amity such plans for a settlement as they may consider appropriate to submit to them, it being understood that the adoption of this procedure does not imply the abandonment of the process of investigation now being conducted by the Commission in pursuance of the Protocol of January 3, 1929.

His Excellency Dr. David Alvéstegui (Dr. Enrique Bordenave) was kind enough then to inform me orally of his agreement with the foregoing. Accordingly, I now have the honor to request Your Excellencies to be so kind as to confirm that oral statement, in order that the neutral Commissioners, who are animated by the deepest desire to aid in establishing perfect harmony between the two countries, may undertake that task, thus interpreting the unanimous and cordial aspiration of the Republics of this Continent.

Accept [etc.]

[Enclosure 2—Translation]

The Bolivian Delegation to the Chairman of the Commission of Inquiry and Conciliation ( McCoy )

Mr. Chairman: We have received the note that Your Excellency was kind enough to address to us on the 28th of the past month, requesting [Page 865] us to confirm the verbal assent given to you by one of the undersigned Commissioners, at the interview held May 31st, last, to the suggestion of Their Excellencies the neutral Commissioners that they make friendly proposals for the settlement of the territorial question at issue between Bolivia and Paraguay, since they consider it indispensable in order to prevent further conflicts and establish conciliation on firm and permanent bases.

In reply to Your Excellency, and in view of the commendable intention expressed by Their Excellencies the neutral Commissioners to offer suggestions to the Governments of Bolivia and Paraguay for the purpose of defining the territorial question, without thereby hindering, in any wise, the procedure arising from the Protocol of January 3rd of this year, the Delegation of Bolivia, duly empowered by its Government, states:

1.
The Protocol of January 3, 1929, shall be continued in full force, the activities of investigation to proceed uninterruptedly.
2.
The friendly proposals of Their Excellencies the neutral Commissioners bearing on the fundamental question shall only have unofficial and informal character and will be conducted outside the scope of the aforementioned Protocol.
3.
The negotiations for an understanding shall be carried out within the term of six months fixed in the Protocol to complete the task of the Commission, after the expiration of which it shall render its verdict in accordance with the provisions of the Protocol, whatever the result of the informal endeavors of Their Excellencies the neutral Commissioners.

We thus confirm and explain, in its true scope, the verbal statement recalled by Your Excellency and we take pleasure in emphasizing the special deference with which the Bolivian Government is willing to hear the friendly proposals of Their Excellencies the neutral Commissioners, whose noble efforts and cordial aspirations it acknowledges and highly appreciates.

We avail ourselves [etc.]

  • David Alvéstegui
  • Enrique Finot
[Enclosure 3—Translation]

The Paraguayan Delegation to the Chairman of the Commission of Inquiry and Conciliation ( McCoy )

Mr. Chairman: We have the honor to acknowledge receipt of your note dated June 28 as follows:

[Here follows the text of the note from the chairman of the Commission, printed on page 864.]

Witnesses as we are, until now, of the active endeavors of the neutral Commissioners to restore the good friendship at present unfortunately [Page 866] shaken between our country and Bolivia; reliable witnesses as we are also of the equanimity and prudence with which they are carrying on their high and noble mission, our Government and its Delegation accredited in Washington, not only grant the authorization requested in the terms of the note which we are answering, but we must be allowed again to acknowledge the generous sentiments which inspire the conduct of the Commissioners.

Confirming, therefore, the assent above expressed the Delegation of Paraguay maintains categorically all the views formulated in the memorials it presented and if it does not now mention them in detail it is because, with the amplification of the powers of the Commission, the matters that it deems to have been in its jurisdiction are not only not affected but on the contrary can be studied and decided more effectively and through a more comprehensive and broader procedure.

We believe it is both our duty, and an obligation of justice, also to state on this occasion that all the Governments which have succeeded each other in directing the destinies of Paraguay have always shown their desire and made efforts for the definitive determination of the dividing line between the respective sovereignties of the two Republics in the vast territory of the Chaco, and the firm and lasting consolidation of the friendship and solidarity that should exist between the two for reasons of identity of origin and of common interests which must bind them inescapably in the future.

Expressing our wishes that the distinguished neutral members of the Commission may obtain in their task the entire success to which their great purposes entitle them and promising our loyal cooperation within the standards indicated to us by our duty, we renew [etc.]

  • Francisco C. Chaves
  • Enrique Bordenave
[Enclosure 4—Translation]

The Chairman of the Commission of Inquiry and Conciliation ( McCoy ) to the Delegations of Bolivia and Paraguay

Excellencies: I have the honor to acknowledge receipt of the note dated July 1st, wherein Your Excellencies were kind enough to answer mine of June 28th, last.

In the name of the Commissioners for Mexico, Colombia, Uruguay and Cuba, and in my own, it affords me great pleasure to acknowledge the new evidence of a lofty spirit of Americanism given by your Government, through Your Excellencies, in accepting our friendly offer. At the moment of undertaking the task of preparing, for submission to Your Excellencies, plans for a settlement of the fundamental question between Bolivia and Paraguay, for which purpose [Page 867] we regard the two nations as being in the same position, we entertain the hope of thus contributing to the lasting understanding between these Republics which the neutral Commissioners are actively seeking.

The neutral Commissioners have noted carefully the matters set forth in the note of Your Excellencies which are considered pertinent to the work undertaken by them and they deem this task to be distinct from the work which belongs to the Commission as a whole.

I avail myself [etc.]

Frank R. McCoy
[Enclosure 5—Translation]

Remarks by the Bolivian Commissioner (Alvéstegui)

The Bolivian Commissioner, Dr. Alvéstegui, said that he wished solely to express, once more, the deep satisfaction with which the Government of Bolivia, and its Delegates in Washington, had followed the course of the friendly negotiations undertaken by the neutral Commissioners, in their praiseworthy desire to assist in the settlement of the pending territorial dispute, because, due to her historical past, Bolivia’s attitude toward the controversy with Paraguay was the same that always led her to procure the termination, by pacific means, of her differences with neighboring sister countries.

He added that Bolivia had taken the initiative of promoting the settlement of the territorial dispute with Paraguay, and that, notwithstanding the little success of her first efforts, she does not hesitate in making new ones to that end whenever appropriate opportunity offers.

He further said that when incidents she had not willed cast shadows upon the international horizon, Bolivia had given again renewed evidence of her pacific spirit, by participating in the Commission of which she is a member, and that consequently, when the neutral Commissioners believed it advisable to seek for a formula to settle the territorial question with Paraguay, which it has been impossible to agree upon through direct negotiations, both the Bolivian Government and its Delegation had given ample support to and expressed appreciation of that commendable initiative.

Finally, he said that since the noble purpose of the informal negotiations had been achieved, he wished to reiterate the appreciation of the Bolivian Government and of its Delegation, to the neutral Commissioners, for their generous and well meaning efforts, and to express the earnest and sincere hope that they may be fully successful in the endeavors, to which the Government of Bolivia and its Delegation in Washington offered the assistance of a loyal and frank cooperation.

[Page 868]
[Enclosure 6]

Remarks by the Chairman of the Commission of Inquiry and Conciliation (McCoy)

I am particularly happy to be able today to congratulate my distinguished colleagues, the Commissioners for Bolivia and Paraguay, for having made possible this decisive step toward conciliation of the differences between them. I believe that they have thereby interpreted in its true meaning the purpose of the Pan American Conference on Conciliation and Arbitration,43 under the good auspices of which the Protocol was signed creating this Commission. May I be allowed also to express to my neutral colleagues my cordial felicitations on the loyalty and lofty spirit with which they have approached the negotiations that have led to this happy consummation, and on their constant solicitude for the honor and respective interests of the two countries. The American Republics, especially those having Commissioners here, have cause to look upon the work of my neutral colleagues with particular satisfaction and I am delighted to make public acknowledgment of this debt of gratitude owed to you and your respective countries.

  1. Ante, p. 835.
  2. The notes when sent were dated June 28, 1929.
  3. See Foreign Relations, 1928, vol. i, pp. 621 ff.