890g.01/202

The Ambassador in Great Britain (Houghton) to the Secretary of State

No. 3020

Sir: Adverting to this Embassy’s despatch No. 2382, January 9, 1928,20 I have the honor to transmit herewith a copy, in triplicate, of an informal note received today from the Foreign Office in reply to Mr. Atherton’s21 informal note to Mr. Oliphant22 of January 4, 1928.23

It will be observed that the British Government and the Government of Iraq agree to all of the amendments which the Department wished to make in the proposed Convention between the United Kingdom, the United States and Iraq, with one exception; namely, the proposed alteration in the wording of Article 4, dealing with the position of educational, philanthropic and religious institutions.

I have the honor to request the Department’s instructions in regard to this matter.

I have [etc.]

For the Ambassador:
F. L. Belin

First Secretary of Embassy
[Enclosure]

Mr. H. J. Seymour of the British Foreign Office to the American Chargé (Atherton)

No. E 4301/84/65

My Dear Atherton: In your letter of January 4th last to Oliphant regarding the proposed Convention between the United Kingdom, the United States and Iraq you set forth certain amendments which your [Page 954] Government wished to make in the so-called “revise of November 1st,” and which they hoped would prove acceptable to His Majesty’s Government and the Government of Iraq. These amendments have in the interval been fully discussed both here and in Baghdad, and I am now in a position to let you know that they are all acceptable with one exception, namely the proposed alteration in the wording of Article 4, dealing with the position of educational, philanthropic and religious institutions.

The suggestion of your Government in this regard was that the words “and to any general educational requirements prescribed by law in Iraq” should be omitted, and that the Iraqi Government should accept in lieu thereof the statement of your Government’s willingness to raise no objection to any reasonable curricular requirements which may be made by law generally applicable to all educational institutions in Iraq. The Government of Iraq point out, however, that Article 16 of the Iraq Constitution provides that the various communities in Iraq shall have the right to establish and maintain schools for the instruction of their own members in their own languages, provided that such instruction is carried out in conformity with such general programmes as may be prescribed by Law. It was in order that the proposed Convention might conform to the provisions of the Iraq Constitution (which cannot be amended before 1930) that the words “and to any general educational requirements prescribed by law in Iraq” were embodied in Article 4. The Iraq Government are advised that, in the circumstances, they could not, without infringing their own Constitution, accord to the United States Government the right to establish and maintain schools in Iraq without conditioning that right by some such proviso as that included in Article 16 of the Constitution.

Apart from this, however, the Iraq Government feel that if they agreed to the proposal made by the United States Government, they would, by implication, be bound to permit that Government to decide whether the educational law in Iraq is reasonable or not, and, in the event of their considering any Article unreasonable, to declare that they held American institutions in Iraq exempt from its application. The terms of Article 16 of the Constitution would, however, preclude the Iraq Government from recognising any such declaration, and a state of affairs would thus arise which they feel would be likely to cause friction and difficulty. They have, therefore, carefully considered the matter with the object of finding some alternative solution which would not be open to the same constitutional objection, but which would, nevertheless, provide a satisfactory safeguard for the American establishments in question.

For this purpose the Iraqi Government, who are anxious to do their utmost to meet American wishes, are prepared to give the United States Government assurances to the following effect:— [Page 955]

(1)
The Iraqi Government will not interfere with the liberty of missionary schools to teach religion to Christian children, or to any other student whose guardian agrees to his attending religious ceremonies;
(2)
The Iraqi Government will not interfere in matters concerning the curriculum, such as the time-table, discipline and purely internal administration in missionary schools.

They trust that these assurances will suffice to meet the considerations advanced in your letter of the 4th January and that, in view of the safeguards thus provided, the United States Government will be prepared to withdraw their objections to the retention in Article 4 of the words “and to any general educational requirements prescribed by law in Iraq”.

I hope that the United States Government will regard this solution as satisfactory and that it will now be possible to sign the Convention as proposed in the revise, subject to the other alterations suggested by you in your letter of January 4th.

Believe me [etc.]

H. J. Seymour
  1. Not printed.
  2. Ray Atherton, Chargé and Counselor of the Embassy in Great Britain.
  3. Lancelot Oliphant, Head of the Eastern Department, British Foreign Office.
  4. This note was based on the Department’s instruction No. 1208, Dec. 17, 1927; Foreign Relations, 1927, vol. ii, p. 806.