393.1163/183: Telegram
The Secretary of State to the Minister in China (MacMurray)
298. Your 758, July 26, 9 p.m. There has been, as you know, no change in the policy of the United States in relation to the protection of lives and property of American citizens in China or in any other country. You are aware that this Government has gone as far as possible in the protection of American lives in China and has only urged the withdrawal of American citizens from places where it was impossible or not practical to give or bring about adequate protection. Where it has been practical to do so necessary military protection has been extended and will be extended to American property rights. It is impossible, of course, and entirely impractical [Page 140] for the United States to have sufficient forces in China to protect property at every place and we cannot assure American citizens that their business will be continued and completely protected under our armed forces. It is also quite impractical under present conditions in China to enforce all our treaty rights with military and naval forces, nor does our policy contemplate action of that nature. I am not aware that the United States has any different policy in this regard than other foreign countries or has extended less protection or made any announcement that it would not extend all feasible protection to American missionaries, universities or others having business or property in China. Department feels you are perfectly familiar with the policy of the United States towards the diplomatic and military protection of lives and property of American citizens and can explain that attitude to the American Catholic University or any other owners of property in China. It is evident that we cannot give any assurances which could be construed as guaranteeing complete immunity in the existing conditions for property rights now held or for future investments. It may well be that ultimately we shall be unable to insure adequate protection for them and that claims will have to be presented covering damages and restitution.