893.51/3803

The American Group to the Secretary of State

Sir: Referring to your personal letter of April 13th to Mr. Lamont, which was received after he left for abroad, we are very appreciative of the suggestions you make in connection with the letter we prepared to be sent to the members of the American Group. We have [Page 766] incorporated your suggestions in a new paragraph at the end of the letter, and enclose a copy of the completed letter for your information and for the files of the Department.

Respectfully,

J. P. Morgan & Co.
For the American Group
[Enclosure]

The Managing Committee to the Members of the American Group

Dear Sirs: We have recently received various inquiries from members of the American Group, and from other sources, as to when it might be expected that the Consortium for the assistance of China might begin functioning. Inquiry has also been made as to whether, if the Chinese Government did not soon recognize the Consortium, it would be wise to consider the dissolution of the American Group. It is altogether likely that no such question has arisen in the minds of your good selves, but in any event, for your information, the Managing Committee has asked us to state to you that it is of the clear opinion that the American Group should continue intact, and with patience await the outcome of the situation in China.

For your further confidential information, Secretary Hughes recently expressed his personal opinion to one of the members of the Managing Committee that any possible withdrawal from the Consortium by the American Group at the present time would be a very serious matter, as concerning the status of affairs in the Far East. The Secretary expressed the earnest hope that the members of the American Group would continue to have great patience and be prepared, when the time came, to render their assistance along sound and legitimate lines to furthering the objects of the Consortium, which were designed not only for the maintenance of the principle of the Open Door in the Far East, but also for the upholding of American prestige.

In forwarding to you this informal expression, the Managing Committee suggests that we remind the members of the American Group that the Consortium was formed originally at the instance of the Department of State; that subsequent to the formation of the American Group along lines laid down by the Department, the Department secured the acquiescence of the Governments of Great Britain, France and Japan to the establishment of a new consortium for the assistance of China along broader lines than ever before. Thereafter, after considerable difficulties, the Consortium was duly organized by banking groups representative of the investment interests of the four countries involved, and since that time the Consortium has been prepared [Page 767] to render such service as it could. Thus the organization of the new Consortium has been peculiarly of American inception, and to its continuance through reasonable conditions American good faith would seem to be pledged.

The members of the American Group, we believe, clearly understood at the time they were invited to participate in it, that while it was expected the operations of the Group and of the Consortium would be conducted not without profit, nevertheless the organization was largely in the nature of a public service designed to substitute the principle of international cooperation instead of competition on the mainland of Asia. At that time the Managing Committee felt and still feel that any break-up of the Consortium would at once lead to a reversion of conditions in the Far East gravely detrimental to the welfare of China, the re-establishment of the baneful spheres of influence, and the undoing to a considerable extent of the comprehensive work accomplished at the recent Washington Conference.

The reason for the policies of our Government in China is to be found in the conviction that, in the interests of the future economic development of our own country, it is essential that there be preserved equal opportunity for practical participation by Americans in the financial and industrial development of China. The activity of American bankers in this field is, therefore, not a matter of mere academic concern, or the support of an abstract governmental purpose, but is provision for a future stage in which they, jointly with American manufacturers and merchants, will feel the need for expansion in the potentially rich markets of China. It is hoped that even a protracted unremunerative period of delay, before the Consortium can begin active operation, will in the long run prove amply justified by the ultimate benefits to the commercial and financial interests of our own country.

We have no doubt that you will agree with us in all of the foregoing, but this letter is simply addressed to you privately for the purpose of covering the points brought out.

Yours very truly,

J. P. Morgan & Co.
For the Managing Committee