Paris Peace Conference 861.00/666

Mr. George T. Clerk to the Secretary of State

Dear Mr. Lansing: Lord Curzon desires me to express his great regret that you did not get the promised note upon Siberia, which I now enclose, before you left London.

Believe me [etc.]

George T. Clerk
[Enclosure]

The British Foreign Office to the Secretary of State48

In a note communicated to the United States Ambassador on Febuary 26th last,49 His Majesty’s Government endeavored to state their views in regard to the policy which they conceived it was the object of the Allies to pursue in Siberia pending a decision by the Allied Powers in Paris in regard to the policy to be adopted towards the Russian problem as a whole.

If the United States Government agree to the views which have been put forward by His Majesty’s Government, the feeling of His Majesty’s Government is that the instructions with which General Graves has been furnished by the United States Government do not admit of the necessary support being given to Admiral Kolchak, with the result that a serious divergence of views has arisen between the Russian representative of Admiral Kolchak and General Graves, as regards the measures to be adopted for dealing with the situation east of Lake Baikal.

[Page 500]

The particular instances to which the attention of His Majesty’s Government has been drawn are as follows:

1.
On March 4th it was reported that General Graves refused to assist a Japanese detachment in serious difficulties against several thousand Bolshevists. This was afterwards confirmed by the Vice-Minister for Foreign Affairs at Tokyo in a conversation with His Majesty’s Ambassador at that place.
2.
On March 8th, it was reported that General Graves declined to send a representative to inquire into Bolshevist atrocities.
3.
On March 20th it was reported that the attitude of the United States troops in the Suchan region rendered the suppression of the Bolshevist rising impossible.
4.
On March 25th it was reported by His Majesty’s High Commissioner at Vladivostock that General Graves declined to acknowledge General Otani’s authority, though he had been accepted as Allied Commander in Chief in the Vladivostock area.50 General Graves stated at the same time that no American troops would be used to suppress a Bolshevist rising which was expected at the time.
5.
On April 4th it was reported that General Graves had declared his neutrality, after being sent to assist Czecho-Slovaks against the Bolshevist forces.
6.
On April 15th General Graves declined to go to the assistance of a Russian detachment which was pursuing the Bolshevist forces in the Suchan area, and in fact obstructed the operations in such a manner that the Bolshevists escaped.
7.
On April 5th, it was reported from Chita that three incidents had taken place on the line with which the United States troops were involved. On one occasion it was only possible to prevent firing by the train passing out of the station. On another occasion the Russian flag was torn down from a train by the United States soldiers.
9 [sic].
On April 11th it was reported that relations between Kalmikoff’s troops and United States soldiers were steadily becoming more strained and conflicts occurred daily, between officers as well as between men.

In drawing the attention of the United States Government to this matter, His Majesty’s Government are actuated solely by a desire that their representatives in the Far East should act in the closest co-operation with the representatives of the United States Government in pursuance of the policy which they believe the United States Government, in common with themselves, have in view.

  1. Copy transmitted by the Secretary of State, at Paris, to the Acting Secretary of State under cover of a personal letter dated May 24, 1919.
  2. Ante, p. 329.
  3. But see note from the British Chargé, no. 26, Jan. 8, p. 461, and comment of the Secretary of War quoted in telegram to the Commission to Negotiate Peace, no. 273, Jan. 16, 7 p.m., p. 463.