Paris Peace Conf. 184.011102/154

Mr. Albert Halstead to the Commission to Negotiate Peace

No. 329

Subject: Conversation with Under State Secretary for Foreign Affairs in regard Tyrolean frontier.

Sirs: I have the honor to inform the Commission that the Under Secretary for Foreign Affairs von Pflügl called on me this morning in regard to the boundary between Tyrol and Italy. Herr von Pflügl is a Tyrolean, and was requested by the Landesregierung of Tyrol to make a final appeal to “President Wilson or the Government of the United States” for a bettering of the boundary between Italy and Tyrol. I informed Secretary von Pflügl that I would take pleasure in communicating this appeal, which was a verbal one, to the American Commission to Negotiate Peace. This appeal is based on the belief which is so prevalent in German-Austria that the United States is endeavoring to promote a just peace. This belief in the disinterestedness [Page 542] of the United States and the hope that this belief has engendered is one of the striking features of the situation in German-Austria.

I am attaching hereto a memorandum of the conversation with Herr von Pflügl, and in that connection would say that amongst other things he said that the boundary which they understood had been fixed between Tyrol and Italy gave Italy more Tyrolean territory than was provided for in the secret Treaty of London between Italy, Great Britain and France.13 In the circumstances I asked him to furnish me a map showing wherein the Treaty of London was exceeded. The enclosed map and memorandum14 show Herr von Pflügl’s views as to the difference, but as he has not seen the Treaty of London there may be some errors.

I have [etc.]

Albert Halstead

P. S. July 17, 1919.

Lieutenant-Colonel Sir Thomas Cunningham, the British representative here, informs me today that Secretary Bauer through one of the Under Secretaries has made a last appeal to him for a rectification of the Tyrolean border and that he wrote a dispatch to his government stating the contents of that appeal.

A[lbert] H[alstead]
[Enclosure]

Memorandum

The following is a memorandum of a conversation between Herr von Pflügl, Under Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs of German Austria, and myself, which took place in my office on the morning of July 16th, and which, while referring directly to the question of the boundary between Tyrol and Italy entered into other features of the political situation:

Herr von Pflügl stated to me in German, there being no one else present, that he had been requested by the Landesregierung (Government of the Province of Tyrol) to make a final appeal to President Wilson or the government of the United States for a rectification of the proposed boundary between Italy and Tyrol which took away from Tyrol not only territory which was of Italian nationality but a large section of other territory which was inhabited wholly by people of the German race and which formed a most valuable part of the Tyrol. He expressed the hope that at the last moment the United States [Page 543] might be able to secure for Tyrol what the Tyrolese regarded as more [mere?] justice and prevent a separation of their brothers and of a most important section of territory from the Province of Tyrol. I naturally gave no expression of opinion on the subject.

Herr von Pflügl called my attention to the character of the Tyroleans, to their love of their land and of their race, and declared that incorporation of a large population of German speaking people in Italy would form an “irredenta” of a most dangerous kind. He said that the Italians told him, and as a citizen of Tyrol he had discussed the subject with them frequently, that for the moment it would be impossible for them to do anything; but that after the treaty was signed Italy and German-Austria could negotiate together and reach some understanding that would be in the interests of both. Herr von Pflügl declared that promises to change an accomplished fact were not convincing and expressed the belief that when Italy once had the separated part of Tyrol in her possession she would keep it in her pocket just as an ordinary individual would keep money which he had procured even though promising to consider some arrangement in regard to it. The cutting off of this large territory from Tyrol, Herr von Pflügl said, would leave only a corridor and would increase the tendency of the Tyrolese to look to Germany as the only country to which they could unite. This remark was made with full understanding of the provisions of Section LXXX of the Versailles Treaty,15 providing for the independence of German-Austria and indicated Herr von Pflügl’s belief in the irresistibility of a natural development.

Herr von Pflügl sought to impress me with the great importance of preventing the acquisition of German speaking villages and sections of Tyrol by the Italians. He declared that the Italians could not be thinking of the future in assuming their present attitude and could not realise that their well-being depended upon close and friendly relations with German-Austria, particularly as “today or tomorrow (heute oder morgen)” war would come between Italy and Jugo-Slavia. In such an event friendly relations with German-Austria, and particularly with the Tyrol, were most important. His own idea, he declared, was a block consisting of Italy, German-Austria and Germany, with the United States as a friendly looker-on. Pointing to the map he showed that Tyrol was the “bridge (Brücke)” between Italy and Germany and pointed out that with Tyrol to the north unfriendly and the Jugo-Slavs joined to the rest of German-Austria, the position of Italy in a military sense was very much in danger. He emphasised the future possibilities of Jugo-Slavia with its present population of twelve to fourteen millions and its capacity for maintaining a population of thirty millions.

Albert Halstead
  1. Great Britain, Cmd. 671, Misc. No. 7 (1920): Agreement Between France, Russia, Great Britain and Italy, Signed at London, April 26, 1915. A translation from the Izvestia which was transmitted to the Department by the Ambassador in Russia on December 5, 1917, is printed in Foreign Relations, 1917, supp. 2, vol. i, p. 497.
  2. Map not reproduced.
  3. Vol. xiii, p. 198.