Sir Julian
Pauncefote to Mr. Olney.
British
Embassy,
Washington, March 19,
1896.
Sir: Her Majesty’s Government have had under
their consideration reports from British officials respecting the
sealing season of 1895, in which complaint is made of the proceedings of
the United States revenue cruisers in searching and seizing British
vessels without sufficient cause.
I am desired by Her Majesty’s principal secretary of state for foreign
affairs to communicate to your Government the inclosed documents and to
submit the following observations thereon. The documents consist of—
- 1.
- A letter from the collector of customs at Victoria of the 15th
October last.
- 2.
- A declaration of Isaac A. Gould, master of the sealing
schooner Katherine, detailing the methods
of boarding and searching vessels and of the examination of seal
skins.
- 3.
- A statement of the names of British vessels boarded by United
States patrol vessels during the season of 1895 outside the
60-mile zone around the Pribilof Islands, with the latitude and
longitude at the time of each visit.
- 4.
- Copy of a “clearance certificate” issued to the British
sealing vessel E. B. Marvin by Lieutenant
Carmine, United States acting customs officer at the Island of
Attou.
It appears from those papers that out of twenty-nine vessels which had
then returned from Bering Sea, no less than twenty-six had been boarded
by United States officers, and these, in the aggregate, eighty-two
times. The average was therefore more than three boardings for each
vessel, and in one case, that of the Sapphire,
the vessel was boarded six times in the course of twenty-four days. In
nearly every instance
[Page 257]
the
sealskins were overhauled and examined and left in confusion, and on
each occasion they had to be repacked in salt by the crews. The net
result of all this labor and annoyance was that the entries in the log
book of the Beatrice were found to be a few days
in arrears, and that a hole was discovered in one sealskin out of a
cargo of 386 on board the E. B. Marvin, which, in
the opinion of the United States naval officer, had the appearance of
being a shot wound. Both these vessels were seized and were subsequently
sent to Victoria for trial.
Admiral Stephenson and the officer commanding H. M. S. Pheasant have also commented on the frequency with which the
vessels were visited, and on the manner in which the search was
conducted. These two officers state, moreover, that the men who command
the sealing schooners are most anxious to carry out all regulations to
the letter.
Her Majesty’s Government have also been informed that the United States
naval officers considered themselves authorized by their instructions to
board indiscriminately all British sealers.
It will be observed from the foregoing summary that the complaints of the
sealing vessels against the United States revenue cruisers belong to
three different categories: (1) the seizure of vessels for alleged
offenses on evidence obviously insufficient; (2) the exercise of the
right of search in cases where no suspicion exists as to an offense
having been committed; (3) vexatious and inquisitorial interference.
With regard to the question of seizure, it was pointed out in my note to
Mr. Gresham of April 30, 1894, and it has since been notified to your
Government on several occasions that the United States cruisers are only
empowered by the British order in council to seize British vessels
contravening the pro visions of the British act of Parliament, which
contains no provision similar to section 10 of the United States act,
and that the United States naval officers have therefore no power to
seize British vessels merely on the ground that they have sealing
apparatus or implements on board. The British act of Parliament only
gives a power to seize when an offense has been committed, and the order
in council authorizes the seizure and detention of any British vessel
which has become liable to be forfeited. Even by the United States law
no general power is conferred to board and search vessels without
specific grounds of suspicion.
Accordingly, by direction of the Marquis of Salisbury, I had the honor in
my note of the 14th of October last to inform you that British naval
officers would in future decline to take over any British vessel seized
by an American cruizer unless the declaration alleged a specific offense
which is a contravention of the British act of Parliament.
There appears to have been some misconception on the part of the United
States naval officers, who have attempted to apply United States law to
British vessels, as is shown by the clearance certificate granted to the
E. B. Marvin by Lieutenant Carmine, United
States Navy, in which the proclamation of the President and the United
States regulations are quoted.
A copy of this certificate is among the documents inclosed and I am
directed to bring it to the notice of your Government, with the request
that the United States naval officers may be informed that their powers,
as far as British vessels are concerned, exist solely in virtue of the
British act of Parliament, and the order in council issued under it, and
are restricted within the limits of the provisions by which those powers
are therein defined.
The exercise of the right of search is likewise subject to restrictions.
The British act of Parliament contains no section enabling an officer
[Page 258]
to stop and examine any
vessel such as existed in the seal-fishery acts of 1891 and 1893. The
arbitration award required that the offenses specified in Articles I and
II should be prohibited, but did not require any preventive action
before the commission of the offense. If an officer has reasonable cause
to suspect a vessel of having committed an offense, it is open to him to
stop and examine her, but he is clearly not justified, in the absence of
any specific ground for suspicion, in stopping and examining every
vessel he meets as a purely precautionary or preventive measure.
In any case the vexatious and uncalled for interference reported during
the past season gives just cause for complaint. Among the points agreed
to by the Secretary of the Treasury, when I had the honor to discuss the
subject with him by desire of Mr. Gresham, with reference to the
instructions to the United States naval officers in May, 1894, were the
following:
That the masters of the sealing vessels should be protected from
inquisitorial examination; that no sealing vessel should be seized by
reason of the absence of a license or of fishery implements being found
on board; that the United States naval instructions as to the mode of
dealing with sealing vessels should be similar to the British naval
instructions; and that the naval officer who examines a sealing vessel
shall leave a certificate with her master for protection against
interference.
I would refer you also to the memorandum of arrangements agreed upon and
recorded in my note to Mr. Gresham of May 10, 1894, and in his reply of
the 11th.
These provisions, which had special reference to the arrangement for
sealing up arms in 1894, show the spirit in which the instructions for
carrying out the award were issued, and it is essential that an
international agreement involving questions of so delicate a nature
should be administered with mutual forbearance and moderation.
Her Majesty’s Government feel sure that it is not the intention nor
desire of the United States Government that men engaged in a perfectly
legitimate occupation, who, according to both British and American
reports, are most anxious to observe strictly the regulations imposed
for public reasons on that occupation, should be treated as if they were
continually engaged in trying to evade and break the law, and subjected
to unnecessary loss and trouble. The right of searching British vessels
was conferred on United States officers on the assumption that they
would exercise their powers with the same consideration as would in like
circumstances be shown to such vessels by Her Majesty’s naval officers,
and Her Majesty’s Government have no doubt that, when the matter is
brought to the notice of your Government, they will issue such orders as
will put an end to an interference with British vessels on the high
seas, which has given rise to so many complaints, and which is not
warranted by the provisions of British law.
I have, etc.,
[Inclosure 1.]
The Collector of Customs at
Victoria to the Canadian Minister
of Marine and Fisheries.
Customs, Canada,
Victoria,
British Columbia, October 15, 1895.
Sir: I have the honor to forward herewith,
for your information, a statement giving the names of the sealing
vessels, the latitude and longitude of each at the time the
schooners were boarded in Bering Sea while engaged in seal fishing
outside of the 60-mile zone around the Pribilof islands.
[Page 259]
I beg to say that all the vessels have not yet returned, there being
eight still out. All those that have arrived report having been
boarded, with only three exceptions.
The boarding officers certified on the official log book the time of
boarding, the position of the vessel, and also the number of seal
skins then on board.
The examination of the sealskins and the opening out of them, shaking
the salt from the skins, tossing and heaving them about the hold of
the vessel, and leaving the skins on each occasion without salt, and
at no time offering to repack the skins as they found them, seems to
be the only cause of complaint of the majority of the masters and
crews during their voyage to Bering Sea this year.
There were only two schooners seized in Bering Sea for alleged
contravention of “the Bering Sea award act, 1894” viz:
Schooner Beatrice, of Vancouver, British
Columbia, Louis Olsen, master, seized in latitude 55° 1ʹ north,
longitude 168° 55ʹ west, by U. S. ship Rush,
for not entering catch of seals in her official log book.
Schooner E. B. Marvin, of Victoria. British
Columbia, seized in Bering Sea by the U. S. ship Rush in latitude 56° 25ʹ north, and longitude 172° 59ʹ
west, for violation of article 6 of the regulations of the Paris
award—that is, for having one skin which appears to have a shot hole
in it. At the time of seizure the E. B.
Marvin had on board 386 fur-seal skins.
These schooners that have returned have all obtained fair catches,
but on the whole the entire catch for the season will be about
33,000 short of last year, owing chiefly to the small British
Columbian coast catch and on the coast of Japan, caused chiefly by
stormy weather.
Those vessels that were boarded in Bering Sea during the past season
will not likely, I think, present any claims for detention, as none
actually suffered loss.
All the skins on being landed were found to be in excellent
condition, and the price paid here for each skin has been $10.50,
but the greater proportion of seal skins has gone forward to London,
to be sold at the next sale, that takes place about the 26th
proximo.
I have, etc.,
[Inclosure 2.]
Declaration of I. A. Gould.
By this public instrument of protest hereinafter contained, be it
known and made manifest unto all people that on the 15th day of
October, in the year of our Lord 1895, personally came and appeared
before me, Harry Dallas Helmcken, notary public, duly authorized,
admitted, and sworn, residing and practicing in the city of
Victoria, Province of British Columbia, and Dominion of Canada,
Isaac Archibald Gould, who did duly and solemnly declare and state
for truth as follows, that is to say:
- 1.
- That I have been captain and registered managing owner of
the schooner Katherine since the
month of December, 1893.
- 2.
- That the said schooner left the port of Victoria on the
25th day of January, A. D. 1895, bound for the west coast,
and remained sealing until the 30th day of April, A. D.
1895, when the said schooner returned to the said
port.
- 3.
- That the said schooner, with a crew of 7 whites and 21
Indians, left for Ounalaska and Bering Sea on the 15th day
of June, A. D. 1895, and remained sealing until the 13th day
of September, 1895.
- 4.
- That the said schooner, when clearing from the port of
Victoria, had no shotguns, nor rifles, nor shells, nor
ammunition of any kind (except one bomb gun) on board, but
had between thirty and forty spears, for the purpose of
hunting seals.
- 5.
- That the said schooner reached Ounalaska on the 20th day
of July, A. D. 1895, and immediately on arrival reported to
the customs. While in port the said schooner was boarded by
two of the American cutters lying at anchor, and I was
cross-examined by their officers strictly as to the nature
of the voyage and as to what arms the said schooner carried.
They appeared to be satisfied with my replies.
- 6.
- That the said schooner left Unalaska on the 31st day of
July, A. D. 1895, bound for the Bering Sea.
- 7.
- That on the 11th day of August, A. D. 1895, the said
schooner was boarded by the U. S. revenue cutter Grant, and against my wish searched
by her officers. The catch of skins, numbering 213, which
had been carefully salted and put in the hold, were pulled
out of the salt and left scattered in the hold. The officers
volunteered to have the skins replaced as they were, but as
I had no confidence in the man tendered, from my own
previous knowledge of him, I was obliged to decline the
offer, and in consequence I was compelled to have the said
skins resalted and repacked.
- 8.
- That I have no fault to find with the personal behavior of
the several officers of the Grant
toward me.
- 9.
- That the said officers made the following entry in my
official log book: “Latitude 54° 54ʹ N., longitude 167° 58ʹ
W., August 11, 1895. Boarded this 11th day of August, 1895,
by officer from United States revenue cutter Grant, and the skins on
[Page 260]
board found to
correspond with entries in official log. D. F. Tozier,
captain, U. S. R. C. S.; K. W. Perry, 2nd lieutenant, U. S.
R. C. S., boarding officers.”
- 10.
- That the said schooner continued sealing until the 24th
day of August, A. D. 1895, when the said schooner was
boarded by the U. S. revenue cutter Rush.
- 11.
- That on this occasion the weather was rough, wind
freshening, and indications of bad weather. I was sailing
under short sail to hunt three of my canoes, About 5 p.m. I
was spoken to heave to and allow them to board. I said I had
lost three canoes, and wanted to find them and did not wish
to be detained, as I wished to find the canoes. After I
found two of the canoes, the boarding officer came aboard to
search the vessel. I protested, as I had only found two of
my canoes. I was feeling uneasy about the third, and I
wanted to find the third canoe, as the weather looked
threatening. The officer said he would not overhaul the
skins, but would detain me to overhaul the log. He asked me
why I did not heave to when spoken to, and I replied that I
considered the men’s lives of more importance than his
business was, and I wished to protest against the assumption
that a sealing schooner must, when on the high seas, heave
to when spoken to, and submit to being searched at the will
of each and every officer who boards.
- 12.
- The said officer did not disturb the skins in salt on
account of being called on board the said cutter Rush, but before leaving made the
following entry in my official log: “Latitude 54° 47ʹ N.,
longitude 168° 27ʹ W., August 24, 1895. Boarded and found
skins to agree with entries in log. J. G. Ballinger, 2nd
lieutenant, boarding officer.”
- 13.
- That on the 27th day of August, A. D. 1895 Captain Folger,
of the American sealing schooner Webster, visited me in latitude 54° 48ʹ north,
longitude 168° 50ʹ west, and in the course of conversation
told me that he was sealing near the prohibited zone of the
Pribilof Islands. An American cutter came to him about noon
and told him his boats were inside the line. He replied that
he was just taking the sun, as he himself feared he was
inside the line, and was flagging his boats to come on
board. The cutter told him he had better get out, as his
boats were inside. At the same time he (said Captain Folger)
could see American schooner Willard
Ainsworth some miles farther in than he was. She
was also allowed to go without being seized.
And this appearer doth protest, and I, the said notary, do also
protest, against the aforesaid boarding, searching, interference,
and occurrences, and against all loss, damage, and expenses
occasioned thereby.
And I, the said Isaac Archibald Gould, do solemnly and sincerely
declare, that the foregoing statement is correct and contains a true
account of the facts and circumstances.
And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously, believing it to
be true, and knowing that it is of the same force and effect as if
made under oath and by virtue of “the evidence act, 1894.”
I. A. Gould.
Taken and declared before me at
Victoria, British Columbia, this 15th day of
October, A. D. 1895.
H. Dallas Helmcken,
Notary Public in and for the Province of
British Columbia.
[Inclosure 3.]
British vessels boarded in Bering Sea in
1895.
Vessel. |
Tons. |
Master. |
Boarded by United States revenue cutter— |
Date. |
Latitude north. |
Longitude west. |
Position and catch certified by— |
|
|
|
|
1895. |
° |
ʹ |
° |
ʹ |
|
Vera |
60 |
W. Shields |
Rush |
Aug. 24 |
54 |
59 |
168 |
03 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
60 |
do |
Grant |
Aug. 31 |
55 |
05 |
168 |
15 |
2d Lt. F. H. Dunock. |
C. S. Cox |
76 |
Charles Harris |
do |
Aug. 21 |
55 |
00 |
170 |
24 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Do |
76 |
do |
Perry |
Aug. 28 |
55 |
21 |
170 |
08 |
2d Lt. E. V. Johnson. |
Triumph |
98 |
Clarence N. Cox |
Rush |
Aug. 5 |
55 |
05 |
167 |
05 |
3d Lt. F. S. VanBoskerck |
Do |
98 |
do |
Grant |
Aug. 9 |
54 |
51 |
167 |
20 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Do |
98 |
do |
Rush |
Aug. 12 |
54 |
57 |
167 |
20 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
98 |
do |
Corwin |
Aug. 19 |
55 |
32 |
168 |
13 |
1st Lt. D. F. A. de Otte. |
Do |
98 |
do |
Grant |
Sept. 3 |
55 |
05 |
169 |
25 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
Katherine |
81 |
Isaac Gould |
do |
Aug. 11 |
54 |
57 |
167 |
58 |
Do. |
Do |
81 |
do |
Rush |
Aug. 24 |
54 |
57 |
168 |
27 |
2d Lt. J. G. Ballinger. |
Borealis |
37 |
Eagar F. Roobins |
Perry |
Aug. 26 |
56 |
00 |
172 |
32 |
2d Lt. E. V. D. Johnson. |
Minnie |
46 |
Victor Jacobson |
Grant |
Aug. 11 |
54 |
54 |
167 |
57 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Agnes Macdonald |
107 |
M. P. Cutler |
Rush |
Aug. 5 |
54 |
53 |
167 |
43 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
107 |
do |
Grant |
Aug. 10 |
54 |
59 |
168 |
30 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
[Page 261]
Agnes Macdonald |
107 |
M. P. Cutler |
Grant |
Aug. 14 |
55 |
23 |
168 |
27 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
Do |
107 |
do |
Rush |
Aug. 24 |
54 |
55 |
168 |
10 |
2d Lt. J. G. Bollinger. |
Libbie |
92 |
Fred Hackett |
Grant |
Aug. 22 |
55 |
59 |
173 |
11 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Do |
92 |
do |
Perry |
Aug. 25 |
56 |
12 |
172 |
12 |
2d Lt. C. S. Craig. |
Do |
92 |
do |
Rush |
Sept. 2 |
56 |
11 |
172 |
47 |
2d Lt. J. G. Ballinger. |
Mary Ellena |
79 |
George R. Ferey |
do |
July 27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Do.a |
79 |
do |
Bear |
Sept. 19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Maud S |
97 |
Robert E. McKeil. |
Rush |
Aug. 19 |
55 |
03 |
169 |
49 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
97 |
do |
Grant |
do |
55 |
00 |
169 |
42 |
2d Lt. F. H. Dunock. |
Annie E. Paint |
78 |
Alfred Bissett |
Rush. |
Aug. 16 |
55 |
24 |
170 |
18 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
78 |
do |
Grant |
Aug. 19 |
55 |
00 |
170 |
17 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
Do |
78 |
do |
Perry |
Aug. 26 |
56 |
03 |
172 |
35 |
2d Lt. C. S. Craig. |
Do |
78 |
do |
Rush |
Sept. 2 |
56 |
06 |
172 |
12 |
3d Lt F. S. VanBoskerck |
Henrietta |
30 |
W. D. McDougall |
do |
Aug. 3 |
55 |
31 |
166 |
18 |
Do. |
Do |
30 |
do |
do |
Aug. 21 |
54 |
27 |
167 |
14 |
2d Lt. J. G. Ballinger |
Beatrice (of Vancouver, seized).b |
49 |
L. Olsen |
do |
Aug. 14 |
55 |
10 |
168 |
55 |
Do. |
Wanderer |
25 |
Henry Paxton |
Grant |
Aug. 15 |
54 |
09 |
167 |
15 |
Capt. D. F. Tozier; 2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
Do |
25 |
do |
Rush |
Aug. 24 |
54 |
55 |
168 |
20 |
2d Lt. J. G. Ballinger. |
Do |
25 |
do |
do |
Aug. 31 |
54 |
55 |
167 |
59 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
25 |
do |
do |
Sept. 16 |
55 |
27 |
169 |
41 |
2d Lt. F. S. VanBoskerck |
Dora Sieward |
93 |
H. F. Sieward |
do |
Aug. 5 |
55 |
12 |
168 |
07 |
2d Lt. J. G. Ballinger. |
Do |
93 |
do |
do |
Aug. 23 |
55 |
20 |
168 |
02 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
93 |
do |
do |
Sept. 1 |
55 |
28 |
170 |
26 |
Do. |
Kate |
58 |
Otto Buckholz |
do |
Aug. 22 |
54 |
43 |
167 |
19 |
Do. |
Do |
58 |
do |
Grant |
Sept. 2 |
55 |
73 |
169 |
53 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Aurora |
41 |
Thomas Harold |
Rush |
Aug. 4 |
55 |
30 |
168 |
26 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
41 |
do |
Grant |
Aug. 9 |
55 |
01 |
167 |
30 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Do |
41 |
do |
Rush |
Aug. 23 |
54 |
49 |
167 |
35 |
3d Lt. F. S. VanBoskerck |
Do |
41 |
do |
Grant |
Sept. 3 |
55 |
13 |
169 |
03 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Florence M. Smith. |
98 |
Luke McGrath |
do |
Aug. 11 |
54 |
40 |
167 |
26 |
Do. |
Do |
98 |
do |
Corwin |
Aug. 14 |
54 |
56 |
167 |
15 |
1st Lt. D. F. A. de Otte. |
Do |
98 |
do |
Perry |
Aug. 15 |
54 |
43 |
167 |
12 |
2d Lt. E. V. D. Johnson. |
Annie C. Moore |
113 |
Charles Hackett |
Grant |
Aug. 12 |
55 |
00 |
169 |
56 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
Ainoko |
75 |
George Heaton |
do |
Sept. 2 |
55 |
14 |
166 |
37 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Walter L. Rich |
76 |
Sprott Balcan |
Rush |
Aug. 12 |
54 |
53 |
167 |
14 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
76 |
do |
do |
Aug. 18 |
55 |
07 |
170 |
25 |
3d Lt. F. S. VanBoskerck |
Do |
76 |
do |
Perry |
Aug. 28 |
55 |
24 |
170 |
17 |
2d Lt. C. S. Craig. |
Do |
76 |
do |
Grant |
Aug. 31 |
55 |
11 |
168 |
08 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Do |
76 |
do |
do |
Sept. 3 |
55 |
05 |
169 |
16 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
Do |
76 |
do |
Bear |
Sept. 20 |
55 |
12 |
167 |
30 |
2d Lt. G. M. Daniels. |
Sapphire |
109 |
William Cox |
Grant |
Aug. 9 |
54 |
52 |
167 |
33 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry |
Do |
109 |
do |
Perry |
Aug. 11 |
54 |
30 |
167 |
06 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody |
Do |
109 |
do |
Rush |
Aug. 12 |
54 |
48 |
167 |
31 |
Do. |
Do |
109 |
do |
do |
Aug. 17 |
55 |
09 |
170 |
37 |
Do. |
Do |
109 |
do |
Grant |
Aug. 21 |
55 |
02 |
170 |
18 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
Do |
109 |
do |
Rush |
Sept. 2 |
56 |
46 |
172 |
55 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody |
Labrador |
25 |
John G. Searle |
do |
Aug. 22 |
54 |
47 |
167 |
11 |
Do. |
Victoria |
63 |
Reuben Balcan |
do |
Aug. 24 |
54 |
52 |
167 |
54 |
Do. |
Do |
63 |
do |
do |
Aug. 31 |
54 |
53 |
167 |
45 |
Do. |
Do |
63 |
do |
Grant |
Sept. 2 |
55 |
19 |
166 |
54 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
Do |
63 |
do |
do |
Aug. 10 |
55 |
06 |
168 |
16 |
Do. |
Teresa |
63 |
George Myers |
do |
Aug. 12 |
55 |
05 |
169 |
22 |
Do. |
Do |
63 |
do |
Rush |
Aug. 18 |
55 |
08 |
170 |
26 |
3d Lt. J. G. Ballinger. |
Do |
63 |
do |
do |
Aug. 24 |
54 |
47 |
168 |
27 |
Do. |
Do |
63 |
do |
do |
Aug. 31 |
54 |
57 |
168 |
20 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
63 |
do |
Grant |
Sept. 2 |
55 |
23 |
167 |
06 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
Penelope |
69 |
Wm. Heater |
do |
Aug. 11 |
54 |
44 |
167 |
21 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Do |
69 |
do |
Rush |
Aug. 12 |
54 |
02 |
167 |
06 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
69 |
do |
Corwin |
Aug. 14 |
54 |
43 |
167 |
13 |
1st Lt. D. F. A. de Otte. |
Do |
69 |
do |
Perry |
Aug. 15 |
54 |
30 |
166 |
55 |
2d Lt. E. V. D. Johnson. |
Do |
69 |
do |
Grant |
Sept. 3 |
54 |
58 |
169 |
09 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
E. B. Marvin(seized) |
99 |
W. D. Byers |
do |
Aug. 21 |
55 |
02 |
170 |
27 |
2d Lt. J. G. Berry. |
Do |
99 |
do |
Perry |
Aug. 26 |
56 |
00 |
172 |
28 |
2d Lt. C. S. Craig. |
Do |
99 |
do |
Rush |
Sept. 2 |
56 |
18 |
172 |
47 |
3d Lt. F. S. VanBoskerck. |
Favourite |
80 |
L. McLean |
do |
Aug. 5 |
56 |
16 |
168 |
13 |
1st Lt. F. M. Dunwoody. |
Do |
80 |
do |
Perry |
Aug. 11 |
55 |
04 |
166 |
07 |
2d Lt. E. V. D. Johnson. |
Beatrice (of Shanghai) |
66 |
D. G. Macaulay |
Grant |
do |
54 |
52 |
169 |
15 |
2d Lt. K. W. Perry. |
a Unalaska Harbor.
b Eighty-three skins found on board in excess
of catch in official log.
A. R. Milne, Collector.
Victoria, British Columbia, October 17, 1895.
[Page 262]
[Inclosure 4.]
Clearance certificate.
William D. Byers, master of the schooner E. B.
Marvin, of Victoria, British Columbia, having declared to
the correctness of the accompanying manifest, and delivered a
duplicate thereof, permission is hereby granted to the said schooner
to proceed in Bering Sea for the purpose of hunting fur seals,
according to printed instructions furnished the master, consisting
of the President’s proclamation and regulations governing vessels
employed in fur-seal fishing for 1895.
G. O. Carmine,
Second Lieutenant, United States
Revenue-Cutter Service, Acting Customs
Officer.
United States
Cutter Service, District of Alaska,
Port of Attou, July 29, 1895.