Mr. Buck to Mr. Bayard.

No. 31.]

Sir: On the 16th instant I addressed a note to the foreign office, of which I inclose copy, urging the claim of members of the Hydrographic Commission of the River Amazon, according to instructions in Department’s No. 119, to Mr. Phelps.

I have, etc.,

Chas. W. Buck.
[Inclosure in No. 31.]

Mr. Buck to Mr. Urrsetia.

No. 9.]

Sir: Under date of July 6,1878, in his No. 91, Mr. Gibbs, at that time United States minister to Peru, presented to the minister of foreign relations the claims of certain [Page 1042] of his countrymen who had served Peru as members of the Hydrographic Commission to survey the River Amazon and its tributaries.

On the 17th of the succeeding January, 1879, the minister of foreign relations, Señor Don M. Yrigoyen, in his No. 3 to Mr. Gibbs, acknowledged the justness of the claim, and stated that the President, through the minister of war, had ordered the consignees of guano in the United States, Messrs. Hobson, Hurtado & Co., to pay claimants the sum of $11,447.63, and stated that the minister of the treasury had given his order for fulfillment. I regret to inform you that a recent dispatch from the Secretary of State at Washington advises me that the order for payment was not carried out, as was said, for want of funds.

It is further made to appear to the Secretary of State that the said claims are still unpaid. In commenting upon it he states:

“The failure of Peru to furnish the funds required for the liquidation of the claims was, perhaps, one of the conditions of the late war; while the attitude of the claimants meantime, who refrained from pressing the claims, has certainly been commendable. It is true, as observed in No. 84 of the 31st of October, 1877, that the claims arise out of contracts, but nevertheless contracts made by these gentlemen with the Government of Peru, which that Government has recognized and ordered payment on account of.

“I have submitted the correspondence in the case to the law officer of the Department, whose comments on the diplomatic sanction afforded these claims and the singular hardship which their nonpayment involves, I concur in. You will therefore use the good offices of the legation to obtain that fair and just settlement which is no less due to the character of Peru as a law-abiding and high-spirited state than it is to these considerate claimants.”

I accordingly ask your excellency’s attention to this claim, as it is not one about the justice of which there appears any question, but as it originated in contract, the amounts were settled and agreed to, and payment of the same has been ordered by the Government of Peru.

I trust the prompt carrying out of that order now in satisfying the claimants, after many years of patient waiting, will only seem both just and reasonable.

I seize, etc.,

Chas. W. Buck.