Mr. Adee to Mr. Phelps.
Washington, September 5, 1892.
Sir: I am constrained to again invite your attention to the Department’s Nos. 420, of May 19, and 435, of June 15, 1892, in the matter of the discrimination practiced against United States patentees by the German Government, and to inclose for your information a copy of a letter from Mr. Henry Connett, of New York, of the 8th ultimo, which seems to indicate a total discrimination in Germany against citizens of this country in such matters.
The Department has frequently received complaints from private citizens, as well as from official sources, against this action by Germany, and regrets that a different course should not be adopted.
[Page 196]The German patent law now in force proposes to give, as you are aware, a certain privilege to citizens of countries which grant a corresponding privilege to German subjects.
Notwithstanding the fact, well known in Germany, that the Government of the United States does grant that privilege to German subjects, the authorities of that country refuse to take the single step that their law has made necessary, in order that American inventors may enjoy the reciprocal privilege in Germany, where it is of great importance to them.
The subject is one that calls for earnest and continuous effort, until official steps are taken to guarantee to American citizens the benefit of section 2 of the German patent law.
The liberality of our patent laws towards aliens has practically disarmed this Government for controversies with foreign states in which equality of treatment is sought for American inventors.
It is proper to add, however, that Congress in its last session endeavored to remedy this defect by a bill offered by Senator Piatt, July 27 last, entitled “A bill to amend the patent laws.”
This bill provided that “no patent shall be granted for an invention which has been patented or officially made public in any foreign country, unless such country shall grant the same privilege to citizens of the United States, or unless the application shall be made under a treaty or convention between the United States and such country.”
It was read twice and referred to the Committee on Patents.
You will accordingly write again to the minister for foreign affairs upon this subject, unless meanwhile the required publication has been made.
It is not intended that you shall prominently assert the threat of retaliatory legislation, but in mentioning it you may say that Congress having adjourned without final action on the bill it would be very gratifying to the President to announce, at the reopening of its session in December next, that the matter had been disposed of so far as Germany is concerned.
I am, etc.,
Acting Secretary.