Legation of
the United States,
Berlin, June 30,
1892. (Received July 22.)
No. 460]
[Inclosure in No. 460.]
Mr. Phelps to Baron
Marschall.
Legation of the United States,
Berlin, June 30,
1892.
The undersigned envoy, etc., of the United States of America had the
honor, under date of 12th of May last, to address a communication to his
excellency, Marschall von Bieherstein, Imperial secretary of state for
foreign affairs, asking that a notice should he published in the
Imperial Gazette that American citizens seeking patents for their
inventions in Germany were entitled to receive them.
Under date of the 21st of the same month his excellency informed the
undersigned that because negotiations connected generally with this
subject and intended to fully regulate the mutual protection of patents
were pending at Washington, his excellency preferred to abstain for the
present from a separate consideration of the question of this
notice.
In the meantime the complaints of American inventors reach the State
Department to which it is impossible to give a satisfactory answer.
These complaints recite the German patent law which went into operation
October 1, 1891. They call attention to the fact that under this law an
American or any other foreign inventor is entitled to the publication of
this notice and to the rights of patent mentioned in it, whenever the
United States or that other foreign country has conceded the same rights
to German citizens. These complaints truthfully add that the United
States has given not only the same rights, but larger ones, viz, the
right to apply for a patent within two years, and speak with some
bitterness of the fact that these rights are not only given by the
United States Government, but are now being used by German subjects in
the United States.
In view of these facts, so well stated in the complaints, the undersigned
is requested to ask why a privilege granted by German law to American
citizens upon a condition precedent which has been so fully complied
with should be withheld and made conditional upon the results of other
negotiations which are not mentioned in the German law, and which have
no actual connection with this matter of fact or practice. And he is
also requested again to urge upon the Imperial Government that fair
reciprocity would seem to require the immediate publication of the
notice spoken of.
The undersigned avails, etc.,