Mr. Denby to Mr. Blaine.

No. 1399.]

Sir: In my dispatch No. 1380, of the 31st of August last, I sent you a translation of a communication of the foreign office to me relating to the Chinanfu troubles.

Having obtained from Rev. Gilbert Reid more specific information as to the condition of affairs at that city, I sent to the yamên on the 1st instant a communication, of which I inclose a copy. I therein briefly recite the steps that have been taken in this troublesome affair, and I urgently ask that stringent orders be sent to the local officials that the missionaries be allowed to hold, occupy, and build on the lot in the east suburb which they bought last March.

I have, etc.,

Charles Denby.
[Inclosure in No. 1399.]

Mr. Denby to the tsung-li yamên.

Your Highness and Your Excellencies: In reply to your communication of August 25, relating to the Chinanfu troubles, I beg leave to make a statement in brief of the case, as it seems to me that it is not properly understood.

[Page 452]

In the autumn of 1887, with the consent of the officials, the American Mission leased a house of Mr. Lin Meng Kuei. Opposition on the part of some persons arising, the officials desired the missionaries to consent to an exchange. The missionaries consented, provided a suitable exchange could be made.

In the winter of 1888 Robert Coltman purchased a piece of land a few li from the west suburbs. The taotai asked the mission to take the land in the country as an exchange for the property in the south suburb, but the mission refused to do so, as the cases were distinct.

The deed to the country land was stamped; the other case remained unsettled. Later on the mission consented to give up the property in the country and continued to press its desire for a suitable piece of property in the suburbs. On the 14th of February of the present year the taotai wrote to the mission in regard to finding an exchange in the suburbs. This was done in obedience to the orders of your highness and your excellencies.

That there was no difficulty in procuring land in the east suburb was shown by the fact that a man named Fu leased to the mission a piece of land in that suburb. This is the land in question.

When the purchase thereof was reported to the taotai, the missionaries stated that they would be willing to let all other matters be regarded as settled, provided they were allowed to retain possession of this piece of land lying in the eastern suburb.

But opposition on the part of a few persons has again arisen. The missionaries are willing to grant another exchange if suitable land be furnished them. There is now no sign of an exchange being made. The missionaries have occupied this land for eight months. They have raised a crop on it. I urgently ask that your highness and your excellencies will issue stringent orders that the missionaries be allowed to hold, occupy, and build on the lot in the east suburb without let or hindrance from anyone.

If this is not done, the whole Chinanfu question will be opened up again, and four years’ discussion will go for naught.

I have, etc.,

Charles Denby.