No. 217.
Mr. Frelinghuysen to Mr. Langston.
Washington, March 7, 1884.
Sir: Your dispatch No. 602, of the 17th of December last, has been received. It transmits a copy of a note addressed to you by President Salomon on the 22d of November last, inviting you to an interview touching the question of indemnity proposed by Hayti to be accorded to foreigners who suffered through the unfortunate events of the 22d and 23d of September, 1883, and at the same time inviting the consuls of France, England, Germany, Spain, and Italy to be present and take part in the interview. In a subsequent note of the 9th of December, a copy of which also accompanies your dispatch, you communicate the view of President Salomon that, according to the judgment of his Government, the events which took place at Port au Prince on the 22d and 23d of September last, provoked evidently by the riots of those days, should be the subject of a special examination, and that his own desire is to put aside from such examination occurrences which have taken place in Hayti at other periods, as well as those which may have been produced in other localities in consequence of these same events. The President further says in that same dispatch addressed to you:
The principle of indemnity once recognized in favor of foreigners who had sustained real damages on the 22d and 23d days of September last, the estimate of their losses should be confided to mixed commissions, the members whereof should be named, half by my [Haytien] Government and half by the representatives of the countries of the claimants, who should have to present in support of their demands all the necessary justificative documents.
The limitation suggested by the President of Hayti, restricting the subject of indemnity to losses sustained by foreigners in Port au Prince during the events of the 22d and 23d of September, and excluding the consideration of losses in other localities of the Republic, resulting from the same events, appears to me somewhat narrow, but as the claim of American citizens of the class now under discussion are, so far as now known, confined to losses at Port au Prince, this Government is not disposed to press that view or to interpose it as an obstacle to the establishment of the proposed commission.
The President also conceives that the submission of the claims of all [Page 302] foreigners whose Governments shall join in the arrangement to one mixed commission, in which all of these Governments shall be represented is, on the whole, preferable to separate joint commissions with each country, and will tend to facilitate a more speedy and just settlement than could reasonably be hoped for from a separate commission for each, and conscious of the high sense of justice by which the Haytien Government is animated in this as in all other matters, no objection is made to that Government having the power to name one-half of the members of the tribunal.
The examination by the commission should also, as suggested by President Salomon, be confined to the consideration of actual and real losses growing out of the events referred to. This Government, however, reserves to itself the right, after full examination by this Department, to present diplomatically any claim of one of its citizens based on the withholding or abuse of any personal rights of such citizen of the United States or indignities to their persons by the officers of the Haytien Government.
There is still one other question to which your attention is invited in connection with any proposed agreement for such a commission. President Salomon observes that the mode of payment could only be settled after the nature of the obligations allowed and their importance shall have become known, and that such question must, in conformity to the constitutional law of Hayti, be submitted to the legislative chambers.
This Government would not feel disposed to assent to any arrangement for the establishing of a mixed commission, which, after subjecting the citizens to the inconvenience and expense of formulating their claims and collecting and adducing evidence and proofs in support of such claims, and accepting the awards of the commission, would still leave entirely unsettled the question of satisfaction of these awards by Hayti, both as to time and mode of payment. A stipulation should therefore be embraced in the agreement binding that Government to abide by the results of the commission’s labors, and to satisfy the awards made against it by payment to this Government, within a fixed period, the amount of the several awards made on account of the claimants who may be citizens of the United States.
I inclose a draft copy of an agreement which may aid you in considering the question in connection with the consuls of the several other powers who may enter into the arrangement.
Before concluding or signing any agreement that may be determined upon between the Haytien Government and the representatives of the several Governments concerned, you will forward an authentic copy to this Department.
I am, &c.,