It will be seen that this report expresses concurrence in a memorandum by
the acting minister of the interior, who caused full inquiry to be made
into the allegations set forth, and failed to discern evidence in
support of the conclusions arrived at by the United States
authorities.
[Inclosure 1.]
Copy of a report of a committee of the honorable
the privy council, approved by his excellency the
governor-general in council, on the 9th October,
1879.
The committee of council have had under consideration a dispatch from
Sir Edward Thornton, dated August 13, 1879, covering copy of a
communication dated 9th of same month from Mr. Seward, acting
Secretary of State, Washington, relating to incursions, attended
with murder and robbery, said to have been made across the United
States border by Indians from Canadian territory, and expressing the
wish of the American Government that the Indians alleged to have
been guilty of the crimes in question may be returned to the United
States for trial and punishment, and that the stolen property may be
restored to its owners, if it can be found.
They have also had before them a memorandum, dated September 9, 1879,
from the honorable the acting minister of the interior, to whom said
dispatch with inclosure has been referred, and they recommend said
memorandum for your excellency’s approval, and advise that a copy of
this minute, when approved, and of the memorandum, be transmitted to
Sir Edward Thornton, for the information of the Government of the
United States.
Certified:
W. A. HEMSWORTH,
Clerk Privy
Council for Canada.
[Inclosure 2.]
memorandum.
Department of the Interior,
September 9, 1879.
The Honorable the Privy
Council:
Referring to the dispatch of Sir Edward Thornton of the 13th August,
covering copy of a communication dated two days previously from Mr.
Seward, Acting Secretary of State, Washington, relating to
incursions attended with murder and robbery, said to have been made
across the United States border by Indians from Canadian territory,
and expressing the wish of the American Government that the Indians
alleged to have been guilty of the crimes in question may be
returned to the United States for trial and punishment, and that the
stolen property may be restored to its owners, if it can be found,
the undersigned has the honor to report to council as follows:
1. The undersigned submits that there is no evidence to support the
conclusion of Mr. Seward that the perpetrators of the crimes and
depredations committed in the Yellowstone Valley were hostiles from
the Canadian side of the boundary, nor is there any good reason
offered for assuming that either the criminals or the stolen
property are in Canadian territory.
2. With respect to the parties guilty of these crimes, the
undersigned thinks it improbable that they were composed of hostiles
from Sitting Bull’s camp. The enmity existing between the Crows and
Sioux will sufficiently account for the attempt of the former to
implicate the Northern Indians in those outrages, and the Crows are
the only witnesses cited in support of the conclusions on this head
at which the communication of Mr. Seward would appear to point.
3. The undersigned is in receipt of a dispatch from Colonel MacLeod,
commanding the Northwest mounted police, dated Fort Walsh, August 9,
covering three reports from Major Walsh, the officer in charge of
the mounted police station at Wood Mountain, dated respectively the
22d, 25th, and 31st July, which prove conclusively that neither the
stolen property nor the criminals alluded to were on this side of
the line, so far as could be ascertained at the time (July 3) when
Colonel Miles wrote the report upon which Mr. Seward’s
representations are founded.
From Major Walsh’s reports the undersigned learns that on the evening
of the 18th July, Lieutenant Tillson, of the United States Army,
accompanied by a Mr. Stearns, arrived at the Wood Mountain police
post, with instructions from Colonel Miles to request the
co-operation and assistance of the Candian authorities in
identifying and procuring the extradition of certain Indians accused
of murder on the southern side of the boundary. Major Walsh did
everything in his power to forward the object of his visit, and on
the 23d of July took Lieutenant Tillson and Mr. Stearns through the
whole Sioux camp (then some fourteen miles from the Wood Mountain
post), so that they might make whatever investigation they thought
necessary, and in order to give the latter an opportunity to search
for horses alleged to have been stolen from him,
[Page 493]
and to see one Johnson, a Nez Percé,
said to have been one of the party which attacked Stearns’s house on
the Yellowstone. Mr. Stearns failed to find any of his horses in the
camp. “I caused Johnson,” says Major Walsh, “to go up and speak to
Stearns when he (Stearns) said positively that he was not one of the
party who committed the depredations.” Every facility was offered to
Lieutenant Tillson for the accomplishment of his mission, and the
active assistance and co-operation of the Canadian authorities
afforded him; but he returned to his command without having obtained
any trace whatever of either the Indians or the property of which he
was in search.
4. The undersigned submits that the Government of Canada has hitherto
exercised due vigilance to prevent Indians from this side from
crossing the border for any other purpose than to secure the
necessaries of life, when the buffalo had left our territory. If,
however, notwithstanding these precautions, horses have occasionally
been stolen by the American refugee Sioux from the Crows and their
other Indian enemies or from whites, the animals have invariably
been taken possession of by the mounted police and handed back to
their owners as soon as identified. The undersigned begs to call the
attention of the council to the fact that no attempt whatever is
made to prevent raids of this character from the other side of the
line. Major Walsh, in his report of the 26th of July, expresses the
belief that twice as many horses have been stolen by the Crows from
Canadian territory as have been stolen from the United States
territory by parties from this side, an assertion which he had made,
accompanied with evidence of its truth, to Colonel Miles, on the
occasion of having an interview with the latter on the previous day.
It is easy to see that, so long as the robbery of horses by Indians
from the United States is permitted without any attempt to check it,
and only on the Canadian side can horse thieves be punished or
stolen horses recovered, the temptations to the Indians north of the
boundary to follow their property and possess themselves of it by
force will continue to be very great. Major Walsh alone has a record
of over one hundred and sixty horses stolen from Canada by Crows and
other Indians from the United States, not one of which has ever been
returned. This is a state of things to which, the undersigned is of
opinion, the attention of the Government of the United States ought
to be particularly called, and he has no hesitation in saying that
on the United States authorities taking similar steps to those
already taken by the Government of Canada to prevent and punish
offenses of this character, such offenses will become, if not
entirely unknown, at least so rare as to form no reasonable ground
of complaint.
All of which is respectfully submitted.
J. C. AIKINS,
Acting for ths
Minister of the Interior.