Mr. Kilpatrick to Mr. Seward.

No. 12]

Sir: I have the honor to transmit a copy (A) of a commmunication I thought it necessary to make to this government in order that no misunderstanding might take place or wrong inferences be drawn from the official report of the Spanish admiral to the Spanish minister in Washington, D. C. You can well understand, by a slight perusal of this, the false position in which it places me, It was sufficiently unfortunate for me that for state reasons I was compelled to passively witness the destruction of American and other neutral property; and I do not now propose to allow the world to think that I officially or otherwise approved of his conduct or sympathize now with his cause. My communication was kindly received by the government, and has made a most favorable impression. The reply, which is in every respect satisfactory, is herewith enclosed, (B.)

I am, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

J. KILPATRICK.

Hon. William H. Seward, Secretary of State, Washington, D. C.

A.

Mr. Kilpatrick to Señor Covarrubias.

Sir: Heretofore, for good and valid reasons, I have not thought it advisable to answer or deny any of the very many statements that have appeared, from time to time, in the papers of this city prejudicial to the republic I have the honor to represent, and most injurious to the long-established friendship existing between Chili and the United States. I am now, however, convinced that to remain longer silent would be to do my country and myself great injustice. I cannot permit the people of Chili to think that my government would send a representative [Page 416] to a sister republic who could do one single act against her welfare or honor, much less display such contemptible duplicity as the remarkable report of the Spanish admiral, Casto Mendez Nunez, would lead them to believe. You, better than all men, know the real motives that actuated me in striving for peace, and that while my action was not official, yet it was, in every respect, open and honorable. From the official report of the Spanish admiral it may well be inferred that I acted for the interests of Spain alone; that I considered his unreasonable terms for peace most reasonable and just; that I openly complimented him for, and approved of, his determination to destroy Valparaiso, and, in fact, approved of his entire course. To say that this is not only not true in word, but in spirit also, is the object of this communication.

The first proposition submitted to you for your consideration by Commodore Rodgers and myself was a complete cessation of hostilities and a mutual salute, in order that the War might end by peaceful negotiation. I thought it my duty to recommend this and this only, and this proposition was rejected by the Spanish admiral, as he says in his report. So far from recommending this ultimatum of Nunez, which included the rendition of the “Cova-donga” with her flag and armament in exchange for captured merchantmen, I distinctly told him Chili could not accept it; that there was a vast difference between a vessel of war taken in honorable combat and helpless merchantmen seized by a powerful fleet, and to which but little honor attached; and you will remember that when I presented to you these terms of the Spanish admiral I took particular pains to state that I simply gave them to you as coming from him for what they were worth, and did not, by any means, recommend them. Again he says that Commodore Rodgers approved of his resolution to bombard Valparaiso, and that I repeated the same words. This also is untrue. I not only did not approve of this unjust act, but I advised him to delay the execution of his cruel orders until others could be sent him, rather than do an act that would disgrace his country forever. I did say to him on parting that we had met and would part friendly; that in the performance of our respective duties each must be the judge of his own actions, and that if I found it necessary to come in conflict with him it would not destroy that respect which I entertained for him as a soldier.

By my protest, a copy of which I herewith enclose, you will see that I do not approve, by one word, the course taken by Spain, and that her representative in his official report has entirely misrepresented me and my feelings towards the nation and people among whom I am sent to reside.

I met Admiral Nunez not officially, but in the character of an individual desirous for peace between two nations which war could do no good, but much injury, not only to them but to commerce and civilization. I had no quarrel with him; and if he thinks because I met him frankly and openly—that because I did not meet and leave him coolly, I approved of his course or sympathized with the cause of Spain, he makes a great mistake.

I have the honor to be, very respectfully, your obedient servant,

J. KILPATRICK.

His Excellency Alvaro Covarrubias, Secretary of State, Republic of Chili.

B.

[Translation.]

Señor Covarrubias to Mr. Kilpatrick.

Sir: I have the honor to acknowledge the receipt of your letter of yesterday, in which you rectify the false assertions and contradict the erroneous impressions caused by the report of Brigadier Mendez Nunez, in reference to his bombardment of Valparaiso, to the Spanish minister in the United States.

The President has read with great interest the contents of your letter, and is pleased to witness the noble efforts you exhibit to maintain the friendly relations and good understanding now existing between Chili and the United States.

With reiterated expressions of my most distinguished consideration, I have the honor to be your obedient servant,

ALVARO COVARRUBIAS.

His Excellency the Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of the United States of North America.