[Extract.]

Mr. Wright to Mr. Seward.

No. 12 ]

Sir: * * * Baron Thile informed me yesterday he was preparing a communication for our government, referred to in my last despatch. Desiring to procure all the information I could, at my suggestion the baron sent me, in his own [Page 2] handwriting, a rough draft of some of the points intended to be presented, which is herewith enclosed to you. The baron also remarked that reference would also be made in the communication to the treaty of 1828, and certain modifications asked for in its revision. * * * * *

JOSEPH A. WRIGHT.

Hon. William H. Seward, Secretary of State, Washington, D. C.

The baron’s memorandum.

“His Majesty’s government has reason to wish for a revision of the treaty of extradition between Prussia and the, United States of June 16, 1852, and also of the treaty of 1828.

“The principal modifications which are desired would bear on the following points:

“1. The category of criminal actions justifying the extradition of the criminals ought to be extended to the crimes of theft and fraud, till now not provided for in the treaty.

“2. The assistance of the American authorities at the proceedings of extradition ought to be granted ex officio, and without causing expenses to the Prussian tribunals. Till now the American authorities do not interfere by themselves, and the expenses caused to Prussia by paying lawyers, policemen, &c., become exorbitant, besides the costs for proceedings of the American courts, which are also very expensive.

“3. The proceedings of the American courts of justice ought to be simplified. The American government has already begun a reform of the respective legislation, and the law of June 22, 1860, offers a proper basis for that purpose. The treaties concluded by Prussia with France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Russia, and Spain require for the extradition of a criminal a simple order of seizure, judicial sentence, or decree of accusation, issued by the home tribunal, (mandat darrat ou tout autre dete ayant au moins la mème force que a mandat,) and no further proceedings before the tribunal of the other country are required. A similar system adopted by the American government would be most benefactory to both countries.

“Advantages respecting the legislation on the nationality of Prussian subjects which could eventually be conceded to Prussian subjects who are or wish to become citizens of America:

“1. It would be granted that, after an absence of ten years from Prussia, not only the rights but also the duties and obligations of a Prussian subject towards his native country cease to prevail. This is a principle which till now has been followed by Prussian authorities only in some isolated cases, but which has not been generalized nor is law of the country.

“2. The article 110 of the Prussian criminal code says: Whosoever leaves Prussia with a view to avoid his enlistment in the royal army will be punished, either by a fine of 50 or 1,000 thalers, or by imprisonment from one month to one year.

“An exemption from this general rule might be introduced in favor of such individuals who leave Prussia before the age of 17 years.”