Mr. Bigelow to Mr. Seward
No. 282.]
Legation of the United
States, Paris,
March 6, 1866.
Sir: On the 2d of March, in the corps
legislatif, the president, Count Walewski, after reading the
paragraph of the address to the throne relative to Mexico, gave the
floor to Mr. Rouher, minister of state, who asked in behalf of the
government that the paragraph should be voted without discussion,
alleging that, considering the present state of diplomatic
negotiations already initiated with the emperor Maximilian, the
discussion of Mexican questions was at this time inopportune. This
proposition was adopted, but not without a spirited debate, in the
course of which Mr. Rouher repeated, in language rather more
emphatic than the government has formerly used, that the French
troops were soon to be withdrawn from Mexico; and, in addition, gave
positive assurances that a future opportunity would be afforded for
the thorough examination of the Mexican question in all its
aspects.
The paragraph was then adopted, and the amendment of the minority
rejected, the members of the opposition protesting that the opinion
of the assembly was not to be prejudiced by this merely formal
vote.
I transmit a copy of the paragraph adopted, the amendment of the
opposition, and an extract from the remarks of Mr. Rouher.
I am, sir, with great respect, your obedient servant,
Hon. William H. Seward, Secretary of State, Washington, D. C.
[Enclosure 1 to despatch 282.]
“Our expedition to Mexico approaches its close. The country has
received this assurance with satisfaction. Led to Mexico by the
imperious duty of protecting our countrymen against odious acts
of violence, and to obtain the redress of legitimate grievances,
our soldiers and our sailors have worthily fulfilled the task
which your Majesty has confided to their devotion. This
expedition has attested once more, in those distant lands, the
disinterestedness and the power of France. The people of the
United States, who have long known the loyalty of our policy and
the traditional sympathies by which it is inspired, have no
cause to take umbrage at the presence of our troops upon Mexican
soil. To wish to subordinate their recall to any other
conveniences than our own, would be to attack our rights and our
honor. You have these in charge, sire, and the legislative body
knows that you will watch over them with a solicitude worthy of
France and of your name.” (Paragraph of the address to the
throne, adopted 2d March, 1866.)
[Enclosure 2 to despatch 282.]
“We condemned the expedition to Mexico, at its outset, in calling
attention to the embarrassments and sacrifices which it would
impose upon France.
“Last year the return of our soldiers was solemnly announced; we
regret that we should have encountered a delay not justified by
French interests.
“The country has not forgotten the early declaration of the
government in regard to the causes of the expedition. It is
astonished to see our army devoted to-day to the defence of a
foreign throne.”
(Amendment proposed by MM. Bethmeout, Garnier-Pages, Jules Favre,
Pelletan, Due de Marmin, Picard, Glais-Bizoin, Javal, and
others; rejected March 2, 1866.)
[Page 826]
[Enclosure 3 to despatch 282.]
[Extract from the remarks of Mr. Rouher, minister of state, in
the legislative body, on the 2d of March.]
“But the speech from the throne expressed to you a thought—that
of the early close of our expedition; it declared that the
expedition approached its termination. That thought is the
common thought of the government and the corps legislatif, and
here I have not to distinguish between the majority and the
opposition. It is the thought of the public opinion. This
thought is expressed in the project of the address.
“Is there a certain shade of differences? Be it so. Let it be
reserved.
“What objection should there be, then, gentlemen, that the
commission and the corps legislatif should express their
sentiments immediately upon this great theme of the early (prochain) return of our troops from the
shores of the Atlantic and of Mexico, making all reserves in
regard to the conduct of the expedition, its results, and its
relations with the United States, for a later discussion.”