Mr. Dallas to Mr.
Seward.
No. 333.]
Legation of the United
States,
London,
May 2, 1861.
Sir: In my No. 329 I mentioned having received
your Nos. 306 and 307, and “a circular of the 9th of March, 1861.” As I
have got no despatch from you, numbered 308, it is probable that this
“circular” was considered at the department as representing that number
in the series. I have now to acknowledge your several despatches,
numbered, respectively, 309, 310, 311, and 312, whose contents have had
my careful and prompt attention.
You have doubtless noticed that the motion of Mr. Gregory, in the House
of Commons, on the recognition of the southern confederation—which
motion I mentioned at the conclusion of my No. 330—underwent
postponement from the 16th to the 30th ultimo, and has again been
deferred a fortnight, for the reasons stated in the extract from the
“Times” newspaper of the 30th April, hereto annexed.
[Page 84]
The solicitude felt by Lord John Russell as to the effect of certain
measures represented as likely to be adopted by the President induced
him to request me to call at his private residence yesterday. I did so.
He told me that the three representatives of the southern confederacy
were here; that he had not seen them, but was not unwilling to do so,
unofficially; that there existed an
understanding between this government and that of France which would
lead both to take the same course as to recognition, whatever that
course might be; and he then referred to the rumor of a meditated
blockade of southern ports and their discontinuance as ports of
entry—topics on which I had heard nothing, and could therefore say
nothing. But as I informed him that Mr. Adams had apprised me of his
intention to be on his way hither, in the steamship “Niagara,” which
left Boston on the 1st May, and that he would probably arrive in less
than two weeks, by the 12th or 15th instant, his lordship acquiesced in
the expediency of disregarding mere rumor, and waiting the full
knowledge to be brought by my successor.
The motion, therefore, of Mr. Gregory may be further postponed, at his
lordship’s suggestion.
I have the honor to be, sir, your most obedient servant,
Hon. William H. Seward,
Secretary of State.
[From the
London Times, April 30,
1861.]
[Untitled]
America.—In reply to a question from Mr. W.
E. Foster, Mr. Gregory stated that in deference to the expressed
opinion of the foreign secretary, who had informed him that a
discussion at the present moment upon the expediency of a prompt
recognition of the southern confederation of America would be
embarrassing to the public service, and in deference; also, to the
wishes of several honorable friends of his, he should postpone for a
fortnight the motion which stood in his name for to-morrow night.
The noble lord at the head of the foreign office believed that the
motion might then be brought forward without inconvenience.
[From the
London Times, May 3,
1861.]
[Untitled]
America.—Southern
Letters of Marque.—Mr. J. Ewart asked the secretary of
state for foreign affairs whether, seeing the possibility of
privateering being permitted and encouraged by the southern
confederation of the States of America, her Majesty’s government had
placed a sufficient naval force, or intended to increase it, in the
Gulf of Mexico, with a view to protect British shipping and British
property on board of American ships; and if privateers, sailing
under the flag of an unrecognized power, would be dealt with as
pirates.
Lord J. Russell said: In answer to the first part of the question of
the honorable gentleman, I beg to say that her Majesty’s government
has directed that a naval force, for the protection of British
shipping, should be sent to the coast of America. As to the latter
part of the question, I will state to the house that the government
has, from day to day, received the most lamentable accounts of the
progress of the war in the States of America. Her Majesty’s
government heard the other day that the Confederated States have
issued letters of marque; and to-day we have heard that it is
intended there shall be a blockade of all the ports of the southern
States. As to the
[Page 85]
general
provisions of the law of nations on these questions, some of the
points are so new as well as so important that they have been
referred to the law officers of the crown for their opinion in order
to guide the government in its instructions both to the English
minister in America and the commander of the naval squadron. Her
Majesty’s government has felt that it was its duty to use every
possible means to avoid taking any part in the lamentable contest
now raging in the American States. (Hear, hear.) And nothing but the
imperative duty of protecting British interests, in case they should
be attacked, justifies the government in at all interfering. We have
not been involved in any way in that contest by any act or giving
any advice in the matter, and, for God’s sake, let us if possible
keep out of it! (Cheers.)