Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XXII, Iran

200. Telegram From the Department of State to the Embassy in Iran¹

Washington, May 18, 1967, 9:55 a.m.

196786. Embtel 4488.² For Ambassador from Battle and Macomber. Subject: Shah and Fulbright.

1. While we have not approached Sen. Fulbright directly, we consider it most unlikely that he would be prepared make amends to Shah of kind Shah would want. It doubtful in any case that Fulbright intended directly insult Shah; his remarks are directed more against Executive Branch. Only Senatorial alternative to Fulbright as host for coffee June 13 might be Symington as Chairman NEA subcommittee.

2. Shah’s reneging on his acceptance Fulbright invitation³ would redound strongly to Shah’s disadvantage as it would indicate sensitivity not becoming sovereign of a proud, strong and independent nation and would damage his reputation here as it undoubtedly would become known. At present Fulbright’s remarks have received no publicity here. Moreover, as you have pointed out to Shah, Iran’s story merits telling to key Senators and the Senators want to hear it as is evidenced by Fulbright’s invitation.

3. We therefore believe it desirable for you once again to urge Shah go ahead with coffee with Fulbright as his host. You might wish stress to Shah that this recommendation comes from Shah’s friends, who have considered carefully the pros and cons and believe this course is in best interest of US-Iranian friendship and understanding.

Rusk

1. Source: Department of State, Central Files, POL 7 IRAN. Confidential; Limdis. Drafted by Eliot on May 17, cleared by Macomber, and approved by Battle.
2. Document 195.
3. Telegram 4520 from Tehran, May 15, reported that the Shah had told Alam that he could not go through with the scheduled tea with Fulbright. Meyer noted that, in the Embassy’s view, the clearly best alternative answer would be for the Vice President to host the Senatorial tea. (Department of State, Central Files, POL 7 IRAN)