92. Memorandum of Conference With President Eisenhower0
March 19, 1959, 2:23
p.m.
OTHERS PRESENT
- Dr. Paarlberg
- General Goodpaster
- Mr. Areeda
- Major Eisenhower
In his meeting with members of the State Department at 9:00 AM this date, the
President directed that Dr. Paarlberg
brief him on the subject of the tariff quota under the Geneva Wool
Reservation.1
Mr. Areeda, who accompanied Dr.
Paarlberg, briefed the President
in accordance with the attached text.
At the end, Mr. Areeda added the
recommendation that in the forthcoming discussions with Mr. Macmillan,2 the
President be vague and say merely that the matter is under
consideration.
[Page 197]
The President questioned Mr. Areeda to
clarify the exact status of the Trade Policy Committee and to ensure that it
bears no relationship to the Tariff Commission. Mr. Areeda confirmed this and informed him that
what was contemplated here was only an administrative action. The President
further ascertained that these measures pertain only to woven fabrics and
not to raw wool.
Mr. Areeda summarized by saying that
the tentative proposal of the Trade Policy Committee will represent a
liberalization of current policy with respect to British wool if the first
350,000 pounds of high quality wool over the breaking point are subject to
only 30% rather than 45% ad valorem, and if the breaking point is not
lowered below the present 14.2 million pounds.
Attachment
3
TARIFF QUOTA UNDER THE “GENEVA WOOL RESERVATION”
- 1.
- In granting a tariff concession on woolen and worsted fabrics in
1947, the United States reserved the right to increase the tariff on
those imports that, in any year, exceed five percent of average
domestic production over the preceding three years. The concession
and Reservation were negotiated with the United Kingdom and extended
to other GATT countries.
- 2.
- This Reservation was first invoked by a proclamation of the
President in September 19564 for the last quarter of
1956. This proclamation provided that after imports during any year
reached a certain “breakpoint,” subsequent imports during that year
would be subject to a duty of 45% ad valorem instead of the
concession rate of 20 or 25% (depending on the fabric). There is, in
addition, a duty of 30 cents or 37.5 cents per pound, but that
doesn’t change.
- 3.
- The President established breakpoints for 1957 and 1958,
respectively of 14 and 14.2 million pounds. In each case, the
breakpoint approximated 5% of production over the preceding three
years. The 5% figure for 1959 is about 13.5 million pounds. The
Trade Policy Committee will probably recommend a breakpoint in that
amount within a week or two. That recommendation will, of course, be
reviewed in the White House.
- 4.
- Until last year, the ad valorem part of the duty was 45% for all
imports in excess of the breakpoint for the given year. Exceptions
were made last year for two kinds of fabrics: certain handwoven
woolens less than 30 inches wide (principally, certain Scottish and
Irish tweeds) and certain “religious” fabrics (that is, special
fabrics used in the manufacture of apparel for members of religious
orders, such as nuns’ veiling). Imports of these items—after the
breakpoint in any year is passed—are subject to duty of 30% rather
than 45%.
- 5.
- An additional exception may be proposed by the Trade Policy
Committee for 1959. The tentative proposition is that certain
“high-cost and high-quality” fabrics will be subject to a duty of
30% (rather than 45%) after the overall breakpoint is passed. This
special rate may be limited, however, to the first 350 thousand
pounds of such imports after the overall breakpoint is passed. If it
is possible to frame an administratively feasible definition for
such fabrics, the additional exception would be of primary benefit
to British exporters.
- 6.
- The foreign countries primarily involved are the United Kingdom,
Japan, Italy, France. Some other European countries ship much
smaller amounts to the United States.
- 7.
- Nearly everyone affected is unhappy with the tariff quota and the
Reservation. To allay some of this concern, the President last year
directed the Secretary of Commerce to make a “special review” of
“alternatives to the present arrangements.” The Trade Policy
Committee proposal may not be thought by the industry to fulfill
that mandate.