89. Memorandum From Francis H. Russell to the Counselor of the Department of State (MacArthur)1

SUBJ

  • Views of British Foreign Office on Northern Triangle

You will recall that at the meeting in his office the other afternoon,2 the Secretary disapproved the suggestion of two northern [Page 177] triangles in the Negev as a basis for meeting Nasser’s desire for contact with Jordan. The British Embassy has just handed me the attached statement of the Foreign Office’s views on the northern triangle proposal.

If the Secretary and Macmillan do have a chance to discuss Alpha in Paris, I believe it will be useful for them to exchange views on this point.

F.H.R.

[Attachment]

Following is substance of a telegram from Mr.Macmillan to Sir Roger Makins dated May 4, 1955.

The Foreign Office explain that the northern triangle proposal is not designed to improve Egypt’s military situation (though the larger triangles would presumably be easier to defend) nor to provide better transit rights for civilian traffic. From the Egyptian point of view its main advantages over the southern triangle proposal would be:

(a)
it is based on the 1947 partition line on which the Arabs take their stand. This makes a good sales point;
(b)
it involves a fairly large cession of territory by Israel. This, together with (a) above would make it easier for Nasser to defend to his own people and the other Arab States;
(c)
it joins the Gaza strip as well as Egypt to the rest of the eastern Arab world and might thus help to ease the pressure of the refugees there by giving them eventually the opportunity to disperse eastwards;
(d)
it is served by a road across Sinai which already exists.

2.
The plan avoids taking from Israel any of the irrigable land or known mineral deposits in the Negev and leaves them in full control of the port of Elath and its hinterland. If this solution were adopted the concessions demanded of Israel in the area south of Hebron and in the demilitarized zone of Ein Gev could be reduced.
3.
Mr. Macmillan will be happy to discuss the northern triangle proposal on the lines above with Mr.Dulles next week if time can be found. He is glad to see that Mr.Dulles has not ruled out the possibility of using it with Colonel Nasser at a later stage. Mr.Macmillan agrees that it would be very difficult to sell to the Israelis; but it may be found that something like it is Nasser’s minimum price for settlement.
4.
Meanwhile Mr.Macmillan is instructing Her Majesty’s Ambassador in Cairo not to put the proposal to Colonel Nasser for the present.
  1. Source: Department of State,S/SNEA Files: Lot 61 D 417, Alpha Volume 16. Top Secret; Alpha. Drafted on May 5. No date of transmission is indicated.
  2. See footnote 2, Document 86.