1. Editorial Note
On January 4 and 13, 1955, the United Nations Security Council continued its consideration of the case of the Bat Galim, an Israeli flag ship which had been seized by Egyptian authorities at the southern end of the Suez Canal on September 28, 1954. The Council had taken up the matter in October 1954 at Israel’s request. For related documentation, see Foreign Relations, 1952–1954, volume IX, Part 1, pages 1660–1741 passim.
On January 4, the Representative of Egypt informed the Security Council that his government had released the crew of the Bat Galim on January 1; that his government intended to release the ship and suggested that the vessel’s cargo might be placed aboard a neutral vessel for shipment to Haifa; and that a subcommittee of the Egypt-Israel Mixed Armistice Commission should discuss arrangements for the ship’s release.
The Representatives of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Brazil, with the support of the Representatives of Belgium, Peru, and New Zealand, commended the dismissal of charges against the Bat Galim’s crew but disagreed with Egypt’s interpretation of the provisions of the Constantinople Convention of 1888 to justify its refusal to allow free and unobstructed passage of Israel’s ships through the Suez Canal. They maintained that Egypt’s action was also contrary to the Security Council’s resolution of September 1, 1951, which had called upon Egypt to terminate its restrictions on the passage of international shipping through the Suez Canal. (U.N. doc. S/2322) (The [Page 2] Constantinople Convention of October 29, 1988, is printed in British and Foreign State Papers, 1887–1888, volume 79, pages 18–22, and in The Suez Canal Problem, July 26–September 22, 1956. (Department of State publication 6392; Washington, 1956), pages 16–20).)
Discussion of the matter concluded on January 13, 1955, when the Security Council’s President indicated that it was the consensus of the Council’s members to regard the Council’s resolution of September 1, 1951, as having continuing validity and effect. For the record of the two meetings on January 5 and 13, see U.N. documents S/PV 687 and S/PV 688.