303. Telegram 921 from Geneva1
Geneva, October 20, 1955, 8
p.m.
921. From Johnson. ReDeptel 915.
- 1.
- In general I think it important that whatever our minimum position on text of declaration may be we start with something more so as to preserve bargaining room. Would never be able convince Wang our first position was final position and first text should have some negotiating latitude built into it.
- 2.
- At same time do not believe text this declaration can be made framework for negotiations on subject to same degree as was possible with agreed announcement on release civilians. That is, do not rpt not believe it would be productive introduce any text unless and until [Typeset Page 418] negotiations reached point appeared some agreement in principle in sight.
- 3.
- I perceive no objection to draft text but have difficulty in visualizing at this stage how negotiations thereon might develop. In event some agreement in principle is reached it is possible CHICOMS may desire inclusion some language in their section reaffirming their position on Taiwan etc. This of course would open door for us to insist on inclusion counter-balancing statements our section. CHICOMS also likely insist on inclusion UN Charter language from article 2 para 4 on “international” and “threat” use of force.
- 4.
- Have no further comments at this time.
Gowen
- Source: Department of State, Central Files, 611.93/10–2055. Secret; Limited Distribution.↩