868.00/5–846: Telegram
The Chargé in Greece (Rankin) to the Secretary of State
us urgent
[Received 7:05 p.m.]
619. Following views expressed in response numbered questions last paragraph Deptel 571, May 4 after consideration various aspects situation including Paris telegrams 2179, and 2180, May 6.2
1. US cannot well refuse finish job if Greek Govt desires. But it should be done well or not at all. Participation must not be so superficial as to prevent accurate and comprehensive appraisal. Sufficient time must be allowed for correction any irregularities brought to light and for observers verification that correction has in fact been made. Moreover acceptance of task should be on clear understanding Greek Govt will promptly in good faith correct irregularities reported to it by observers.
To accomplish purposes set forth in Deptel 571, May 4 it would [Page 159] seem necessary observe actual plebiscite as well as revision registers since otherwise certification of registers would be construed by interested parties as authenticating whatever results plebiscite might yield, though correct revision obviously no guarantee they will be properly voted. Deptel 571, May 4 appears contemplate such plebiscite supervision while Paris telegrams 2179 and 2180, May 6 give no indication Secretary and Bevin envisage that possibility. Suggest this point be clarified and consideration given to opinion of samplers as to ability effectively observe plebiscite with whatever personnel is considered adequate for observing revision registers.
[Here follow replies to remaining Department queries: the minimum requirement would be sixty Allied observers as well as drivers, interpreters, and a headquarters staff of ten; at least three months would be required to revise the electoral lists; and October 27 was the latest date in 1946 that the plebiscite could be held.]
Sent Dept as No. 619; repeated to London as 35 and Paris as 32.