10 Files: US/A/C.6/1619
United States Delegation Working Paper
Progressive Development and Codification of International Law
The attached document entitled “Resolution Relating to the Progressive Development and Codification of International Law Proposed by the United States and Chinese Delegations” contains the same proposals as those set forth in the United States position paper on [Page 537] this subject (Position Papers, Committee 6, tab 5)20 with the following modifications:
- 1.
- The position paper recommended the establishment of a subcommittee by Committee VI while the attached resolution proposes the creation of a committee by the General Assembly.
- 2.
- The position paper recommended consideration by the subcommittee of the “division of labor between the General Assembly and the Economic and Social Council” while the attached resolution proposes consideration of the “method of consultation with the Economic and Social Council and other organs of the United Nations.”
These modifications were made after a conference with Dr. S. S. Liu, of the Chinese Delegation which had expressed its desire to make these proposals jointly with the United States Delegation.21
- This short title refers to the Master Files found in the Reference and Documents Section of the Bureau of International Organization Affairs, Department of State.↩
- The book of position papers for the Sixth Committee is found in the IO Files. This particular paper is not printed; it followed the line of thought described in the informal memorandum forwarded by the Department to the Acting United States Representative at the United Nations (Johnson) under instruction no. 23, July 30; see footnote 1, p. 525.↩
- In a meeting with members of the United States Delegation to the General Assembly on October 17, Mr. John Maktos had outlined the Department’s thinking on the proposed resolution on codification of international law. “Mr. Maktos said as far as he knew the British agreed with the United States’ suggestions. He said, however, that the [United Nations] Secretariat might want a committee of experts to study the matter. Mr. Maktos said he agreed that the committee should be made up of experts, but that the experts should be international lawyers with official positions in their governments so that their governmental viewpoints could be presented.” (Minutes of the Second Meeting of the U.S. Delegation, New York, October 17, 1946, 2:30 p.m.: IO Files, document US/A/M (Chr.)/2)↩