740.00119 PW/10–2545

Report by the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee84

SWNCC 83/6

Policy of the United States Toward China With Special Reference to U. S. Military Responsibility in the Training and Equipment of Chinese Armed Forces

Report by the State-War-Navy Coordinating Subcommittee for the Far East

the problem

1. To review general U. S. policy toward China, with particular relation to military and political considerations.

2. In the light of such review to determine what assistance should be given by the United States in the training and equipment of Chinese armed forces.

facts bearing on the problem

3. See Appendix “A”.85

discussion

4. See Appendix “B”.86

[Page 584]

conclusions

5. The objectives of the United States in the Far East are:

a.
To provide for the security of the United States and its territory and for the maintenance of international peace; and
b.
To create a political atmosphere conducive to the establishment of mutually beneficial commercial and cultural relations between the United States and its citizens and Far Eastern Areas and their nationals.

6. The achievement of these objectives in China requires a friendly, unified, independent nation with a stable government resting, in so far as practicable, on the freely expressed support to [of?] the Chinese people.

7. To the end that the progress and development of China in this direction may be furthered, the following should be established as policies of the United States:

a.
To support and assist the national government of China in development along lines which are compatible with our basic objectives in the Far East;
b.
To assist and advise China in the development of modern armed forces, ground, sea and air, for the following purposes only: (1) maintenance of internal peace and security in China, including the liberated areas of Manchuria and Formosa, and (2) the fulfillment of those obligations which may devolve upon China in the occupation of Korea and Japan;
c.
To discontinue our assistance to the development of Chinese armed forces, upon due notice to the Chinese Government, if at any time it is established to the satisfaction of the United States Government that the Chinese armed forces are being used in support of an administration not in conformity with the general policies of the United States, to engage in fratricidal war, or to afford a threat of aggression.

8. The extent to which political stability is being achieved in China under a unified, fully representative government is regarded by the United States as a basic consideration which will at all times govern the furnishing of economic, military, or other assistance to that nation. The question of continuing such assistance should be reconsidered periodically in relation to this basic consideration.

9. The Joint Chiefs of Staff should be requested to survey and report upon the needs of China’s armed forces in the light of the policies outlined above, and to recommend to the Secretaries of War and the Navy as to the nature and extent of United States assistance in the development and maintenance of these armed forces.

10. The Secretary of State should arrange, either through our established diplomatic and consular representation in China or through representation on such military and naval missions or other means as may be available to him, for a continuing survey of, and periodic [Page 585] review and report upon, political conditions and developments in China as they are related to the extension of military aid to that country. Upon the basis of such survey, review and report, this government should periodically reconsider the extent to which further military assistance should be afforded to China, and the conditions upon which it should be extended.

11. The terms and conditions of all aid rendered to China should be established under arrangements to be agreed upon between the Governments of the United States and China. The arrangements should include the methods of payment, financial and otherwise, by China for the aid rendered by the United States.

12. It is believed that this paper should not be made public or communicated to any foreign governments. We should, however, keep other interested governments adequately informed of steps taken to implement our policy.

recommendations

13. It is recommended that:

a.
This report be referred to the Joint Chiefs of Staff for comment from the military point of view; and
b.
Upon approval by the SWNCC of the “Conclusions” in paragraphs 5 to 12 above, this report be transmitted to the Joint Chiefs of Staff and to the State, War and Navy Departments for their guidance and, where appropriate, for implementation.

[Annex 1]

Appendix “A”

Facts Bearing on the Problem

1. A memorandum from the Department of State on 3 April 1945,87 Appendix to SWNCC 83/1,88 includes the following statements concerning United States policies:

“2. Long-range Objectives and Policy of the United States with respect to China.

“The American Government’s long-range policy with respect to China is based on the need to have China a principal stabilizing factor in the Far East as a fundamental condition for peace and security in that area. In particular, the political aspects of our policy are directed toward the establishment of a strong, stable and united China with a government representative of the wishes of the Chinese people which will effectively discharge its internal and international responsibilities. While favoring no political faction we continue to support the existing government of China. However, we look for the establishment [Page 586] within its framework of the unified and effective type of government that is needed.…89

“3. Important political and economic considerations, some of which are mentioned below, are involved in the development of a strong China capable of contributing effectively ot the maintenance of peace and security in the Far East. The future military strength of China is also an important element. A well-trained and well-equipped Chinese national (non-political) army, supported by a modern air force, would unquestionably contribute materially to the maintenance of a strong China.…

“4. Political Considerations.

“Existing political conditions in China are such as to require the greatest caution and flexibility in the application of measures designed to implement the objectives set forth in paragraph 1.

  • a. The American Government recognizes and supports the National Government of the Republic of China under the leadership of Chiang Kai-shek. However, the unrepresentative character of the present government which is strictly controlled by a single party, namely, the Kuomintang, the inefficiency of its governmental, administrative and judicial machinery, the inefficiency and corruption prevalent in the present Chinese army and air force, the lack of protection accorded to persons and property, and the absence of freedom of speech and freedom of the press, constitute factors which have created widespread dissatisfaction with the present National Government.
  • b. There are political groups of varying strength and importance which are opposed to the present Kuomintang-controlled National Government. These are:
    • “(1) The Chinese Communist Party which, during the past ten years and in spite of the efforts of the National Government to liquidate its members, has developed into a dynamic force controlling considerable areas in the provinces of Shensi, Shansi, Hopei, Shantung, Anhwei and Kiangsu. It exercises political and military control over a population variously estimated to range from twenty to fifty million people.
    • “(2) The Democratic League which may be described as a loose federation of minor political parties and groups opposed to continued control of the government by a single party, namely, the Kuomintang.
    • “(3) Certain Chinese militarists in Szechuan, Yunnan and Kwangsi. Mention might also be made of the semi-independent military rules of Tsinghai, Sikang and Ninghsia whose allegiance to the National Government is largely nominal.

“The existence of these dissident elements.… constitutes a disturbing factor in the present political situation in China. This political disaffection has, of course, been greatly aggravated by the severe hardships suffered by the people as a result of eight years of continuous resistance to the Japanese.

“It appears … to be of the utmost importance that our support of the present Kuomintang-controlled National Government should be realistically alert to these political factors.… Through our diplomatic and military representatives in China, efforts are being made [Page 587] to induce the leaders of the present National Government to take rapid and concrete measures to effect the establishment of constitutional government and to bring about the internal unity and solidarity which is essential to the development of China as a strong nation capable of maintaining peace and security in the Far East. Whether … a constitutional government based solidly upon the support of the people will in fact be established in the near future remains to be seen.”

2. Recent military support rendered the Chinese Government has been consistent with the United States short-range policy as communicated by the Department of State to the Secretaries of War and the Navy and by them to the Joint Chiefs of Staff about 1 February 1945.90 The execution of this policy through the medium of military lend-lease included transfer of equipment for and training of a Chinese army of thirty-nine divisions and, on a lesser scale, support of the Chinese air force. It is estimated that of the equipment involved in the thirty-nine division program approximately one-third has been handed over in China to the Chinese Government, approximately one-third is in the Chinese and India–Burma theaters but not yet turned over to the Chinese, one fifth is enroute between United States and Asia ports and practically all the remainder is assigned but not yet shipped from the United States.

3. Generalissimo Chiang and Dr. Soong have at various times requested that United States military aid be furnished China to the extent of equipping and training from 90 to 120 Chinese divisions.

4. On 14 September 1945, the President made the following oral statement to Dr. T. V. Soong concerning assistance to China:

[Here follows statement printed on page 561.]

[Annex 2]

Appendix “B”

discussion

1.
The objective of the United States Government in the Pacific and the Far East are essentially two-fold:
a.
To provide for the security of the United States and its territory and for the maintenance of international peace; and
b.
To create a political atmosphere conducive to the establishment of mutually beneficial commercial and cultural relations between the United States and its citizens and Far Eastern areas and their nationals. Policies and implementing procedures should be carefully examined to determine whether and to what degree they are consonant with and contribute toward the achievement of these objectives.
2.
SWNCC 83/1, as of the date that it was promulgated,91 constituted a clear statement of our policy of encouraging a united democratic China, with particular relation to the furnishing of military assistance and advice as a means to that end. Developments since then, however, have resulted in changes in the relative importance, as outlined below, of some of the considerations discussed therein:
a.
Recently resumed Kuomintang–Communist conversations indicate that efforts are being made to improve the internal Chinese political situation. The greatly increased fluidity of the Chinese political situation resulting from the end of hostilities with Japan and the problems precipitated by this event make it clear that the means of implementing U. S. objectives in that country must be considered flexible and subject to frequent review in the light of changing circumstances.
3.
In SWNCC 83/2/D92 the statement is made that “Continued support to China, if it is to be adopted, should be carried on without hiatus in order best to preserve the present favorable position of the United States with respect to China.” Our “present favorable position” in China, cannot, in the context of SWNCC 83/2/D and in the light of the present situation, be interpreted otherwise than as referring to our position as military collaborators with Chiang Kai-shek. The question whether a continuation or capitalization of this position will contribute toward the objective of our security in the Pacific and Far East and the maintenance of international peace requires close examination in the light of a number of factors. SWNCC 83/2/D states that “consideration of the World-wide military surplus stocks now existing makes it appear that the Chinese Government will receive military support from other sources if the United States position of support to the Chinese Government is not maintained.” The U. S. S. R. is admittedly in mind. However, one must keep the U. S. S. R. in mind, not only as a possible supplier of material and advice to China in the event that we do not, but also as a competitor in the event that we do supply materials and advice on a scale which the U. S. S. R. might interpret as threatening. The Russian intention to withdraw all Soviet forces from Manchuria and recent informal but authoritative expressions of Russian opinion indicate that the U. S. S. R. is for the present at least prepared to deal with us on a partnership basis in the Far East. It is to our interest to encourage and support this position on the [Page 589] part of the U. S. S. R. It is likewise the general policy of the United States to consider common problems on a consultative basis.
4.
In granting any military assistance to China we should therefore exercise care to give no basis for a suspicion that we are creating a de facto colonial army in China under our official aegis. For this reason consideration should be given to informing other interested governments of steps being taken by the United States toward the implementation of our policy. The Chinese Government should be advised informally at the time agreements for advice and assistance are negotiated that the United States would expect China not to accept concurrent military assistance or representatives (other than normal military and naval attachés) from other nations without prior consultation with the United States.
5.
In addition to the foregoing considerations which are predominantly political, our policies toward China must also be surveyed in relation to economic requirements. This will be the subject of another paper, but the point must be emphasized at this time that our over-all policy vis-à-vis China embraces political and economic as well as military considerations, and that our policies in relation to military affairs must be integrated with and used in support of our policies in other fields.
6.
It is consistent with our objectives that internal peace and security be established and maintained in China, including those areas now being recovered from the Japanese Subject to the considerations set forth in paragraphs 1–5 above, it is to our interest:
a.
To assist and advise China in the development of modern armed forces, ground, sea and air, for the following purposes only: (1) maintenance of internal peace and security in China, including the liberated areas of Manchuria and Formosa, and (2) the fulfillment of those obligations which may devolve upon China in the occupation of Korea and Japan;
b.
To discontinue our assistance to the development of Chinese armed forces, upon due notice to the Chinese Government, if at any time it is established to the satisfaction of the United States Government that the Chinese armed forces are being used in support of an administration not in conformity with the general policies of the United States, to engage in fratricidal war, or to afford a threat of aggression.
7.
The terms and conditions of all aid rendered to China should be established under arrangements to be agreed upon between the Governments of the United States and China. The arrangements should include the methods of payment, financial and otherwise, by China for the aid rendered by the United States.
8.
To insure that the proposed military assistance is responsive to the actual requirements of the Chinese Government, and likewise to [Page 590] insure that our objectives as outlined above will be furthered in the event that such assistance is extended, pursuant to agreement between the Governments of the United States and China, the Joint Chiefs of Staff should be requested to survey and report upon the needs of China’s armed forces in the light of the considerations outlined above, and to recommend to the Secretaries of War and Navy as to the nature and extent of United States assistance in the development and maintenance of these armed forces over and above present commitments.
9.
To the same end, the Secretary of State should arrange, either through our established diplomatic and consular representation in China or through representation on such military and naval missions or other means as may be available to him for a continuing survey of, and periodic review and report upon, political conditions and developments in China as they are related to the extension of military aid to that country. Upon the basis of such survey, review and report, this Government should periodically reconsider the extent to which further military assistance should be afforded to China, and the conditions upon which it should be extended.
  1. Copy of revised paper (SWNCC 83/4 as amended by SWNOC 83/5, neither printed, approved by the Committee at its 28th meeting on October 22) transmitted to the Secretary of State by the Acting Chairman of the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee (Matthews) in his memorandum of October 25, not printed; similar memoranda were forwarded to the Secretaries of War and Navy and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, for their guidance and, where appropriate, for implementation. Copy transmitted to the Chargé in China (Robertson) by the Secretary of State in instruction No. 348, November 7, not printed, which noted paragraph 10 in particular.
  2. Annex 1, infra.
  3. Annex 2, p. 587.
  4. Memorandum concerning United States post-war military policies with respect to China, p. 74.
  5. Text of the covering memorandum was the same as the memorandum by Mr. H. Freeman Matthews, May 29, p. 116.
  6. Omissions indicated in the original.
  7. See footnote 52, p. 37.
  8. A memorandum for the Secretaries of State, War, and Navy, of May 28 (enclosure in a note by the Secretaries, SWNCC 83/1, not printed), stated that the Committee had concluded on that date that “the political policy of the United States with respect to China is as set forth in the enclosure” (State Department paper dated April 3, p. 74).
  9. Note of September 4 by the Secretaries of the State-War-Navy Coordinating Committee and enclosure, not printed.