893.00/8–2144

The Ambassador in China (Gauss) to the Secretary of State

No. 2890

The Ambassador has the honor to enclose a memorandum prepared by Second Secretary Robert S. Ward containing a statement of the projects and aims of certain members of the Northeastern groups who formerly controlled Manchuria as related by a member of one of those groups to Mr. Ward.

[Enclosure]

Memorandum by the Second Secretary of Embassy in China (Ward)

The informant, Mr. Chow Ching-wen, stated that a secret meeting of the Society of Comrades for Resistance to Japan (the formal name [Page 512] of a group of supporters of Marshal Chang Hsueh-liang) is to be held in Sian shortly, at which he expects that an already prepared project for the government of Manchuria after the present war will be “approved”. The projected “government” calls for the institution of democracy in Manchuria in two stages, during the first of which the Young Marshal is expected to rule with the “assent” of the people, who will be protected by laws guaranteeing their basic liberties. The “second stage” will be inaugurated not later than three years after the inception of the first with a general election in Manchuria, in which a People’s Council, possessing both executive and Legislative Powers, will be elected. Manchuria will thereafter be under the “Autonomous Democratic Regional Government of Manchuria”, loosely connected with what the proponents of the scheme envisage as the “Federal Government” of China. Because this arrangement would (1) avoid a government of Manchuria dominated by the Chinese Communists, and therefore by Russia; (2) forestall the clash with Russia which might result from the extension to Manchuria of the “Fascist” Central Government; and (3) assure a regime whose social aims would not be too different from those of the Russians, it would, its proponents claim, be good for the peace of Asia.

This statement of the aims of Northeastern elements and the plans which they are elaborating for achieving them is believed to be of interest (1) because it affords further evidence of the extent to which various groups, some of whom perhaps are more interested in gaining power than in instituting liberal reforms, are taking advantage of the present situation, and (2) as an indication of the centrifugal forces which may operate to break down Chinese unity as soon as the present war is brought to a close. It should be pointed out, however, that the Northeastern groups whom the informant describes have no base of power, their armies having been dispersed and many of their leaders killed in the course of the war. It is therefore very unlikely that this movement, taken alone and in itself, will be in any measure successful.

Robert S. Ward