893.00/15369

The Ambassador in China (Gauss) to the Secretary of State

No. 2496

Sir: Referring to the Embassy’s despatches no. 2320 of March 17, 1944, in regard to the Communist-controlled areas in north China and no. 2368 of March 28, 1944, in regard to Kuomintang-Communist relations, I have the honor to enclose a copy of a letter of April 12 received in translation from General Ho Ying-chin, Chief of Staff and Minister of War, by General Hearn, Chief of Staff to General Stilwell, in reply to his inquiry addressed to the Chinese military authorities regarding the Chinese Communist Party.

Summary of Letter. The policy of the Chinese Communists is to prolong the war and frustrate the Chinese war effort in order that the Chinese Communist Party may take advantage of chaotic conditions to seize political power in China. There is a possibility of an armed revolt by the Chinese Communists during 1944 and the Central Government maintains troops near the Communist areas as a precautionary measure against a Communist uprising, these troops having been moved into that region following the concentration of Communist troops in north Shensi since July 1943. The Central Government maintains a policy of tolerance toward the Communists, who are opposed to Allied pressure on Japan and whose actions are not decided by the situation in China alone. The Chinese Communist troops have attacked Chungking troops and have forced the latter to surrender and become puppet forces. The people in the occupied areas are loyal in their support of the Central Government while in territories “under Communist penetration” a state of unrest prevails. The most effective measure against Communist activities is the Central Government’s policy of education of the people in the San Min Chu I and of [Page 400] promotion of the national consciousness of the Chinese people. End of Summary.

General Ho’s letter contains no new material and follows closely the Kuomintang propaganda line against the Chinese Communists. There are obvious untruths in the letter, such as the inference that the Central Government troops blockading the Communist areas were sent to the Northwest only after the Communist concentrations in north Shensi in July 1943, when the circumstances as generally admitted even by Central Government officials are that the Communists did not increase the number of their troops in north Shensi until a month or more after the Central Government had reinforced its blockade in July of last year. The accusation that the Communists hinder the war effort and do not wish Allied pressure on Japan is hardly borne out by the Domei reports of constant Japanese clashes with Communist forces in north China in recent months while there is almost no reference by Domei to any fighting with Central Government forces. The statement that the Central Government has no intention of making use of puppet units is hardly credible and the placing of the blame on the Communist forces for the surrender of these erstwhile Chungking troops is slightly ludicrous. It is also difficult to reconcile General Ho’s statement that the people in the occupied areas are loyal in their support of the Central Government while a state of unrest prevails in Communist areas with the reports of conditions in the Communist-controlled areas in north China received by the Embassy from impartial observers who have resided in or passed through those areas during the past two years.

General Ho’s letter is the more astounding in that it actually represents a reply to direct questions posed by the American military authorities here, questions which reveal a lack of political sagacity and which were asked of the Chinese military authorities on the basis that answers thereto would enable the American authorities to keep the War Department correctly informed of the situation. The questions asked were leading questions to an extreme, such as “Is it possible that the Communists or other forces will start a civil war in 1944?” and “Is it the long range policy of the Communists to start a war now or to wait until the conclusion of the war with Japan?”

General Ho’s letter was handed to the Embassy by General Hearn for its information and is being forwarded to the Department as an example both of Kuomintang thinking and of the political naiveté of the American military authorities.

Respectfully yours,

C. E. Gauss
[Page 401]
[Enclosure—Translation]

The Chinese Chief of Staff (Ho) to General Stilwell’s Chief of Staff (Hearn)

Dear General Hearn: This will acknowledge the receipt of your letter of February 28, 1944, addressed to General Shang Chen, former Director of the Foreign Affairs Bureau of the National Military Council. To your query I wish to reply as follows:

1. The policy of the Chinese Communist Party is to resort to the use of all kinds of intrigues and conspiracies to prolong China’s war of resistance as long as possible or even to frustrate China’s war effort altogether in the hope of creating a state of general confusion in the Far East. Taking advantage of the confusion and in cooperation with certain international elements, the Chinese Communist Party would seize the political power in China to serve as a stepping stone towards a World Revolution.

In the current year—1944—there is always the possibility of an armed revolt on the part of the Chinese Communists against the Central Government. Since last July, the Chinese Communists have been withdrawing their armed forces from Shansi and elsewhere and concentrating them in North Shensi. They have since taken up a position from which they could threaten the rear of the 8th War Area. This action on the part of the Chinese Communists is obviously strategically favourable to the enemy. To meet possible emergencies, the Central Government has been compelled to maintain a certain number of troops in that region. In other words, these troops are stationed there as a precautionary measure against a possible Communist uprising as well as against a possible Japanese invasion of that region. In fact, the Central Government is having the situation well in hand and has seen to it that even [if] the Chinese Communists should stage a revolt no strategic advantage would be allowed the Japanese. Nevertheless, the Government is still doing its best to prevent the Chinese Communists from taking such a step. It must be emphasized that aside from the armed forces of the Chinese Communist Party, there is no independent armed unit throughout China.

2. Since 1941 the strength of the Chinese Communist Party has been on the decline. Out of the troops who had been coerced into submission by the Communists, three Divisions have been organized by order of the Central Government. Of the rest, they are only an unorganized and undisciplined and untrained horde. Therefore, should they actually rise up in open armed revolt the Central Government will be able to mete out immediate and effective measures to cope with the situation and no strategical advantage would be allowed the Japanese. [Page 402] The Government, however, is still maintaining a policy of tolerance towards the Chinese Communist Party, hoping that nothing of that nature would be done by the latter.

3. The object of the Chinese Communist Party is to seize political power, “sovietize” China and create disturbances in the Far East in general and in China in particular. As to how they will seize this opportunity to carry out their plans, that is only known to themselves. However, there is one thing that should be noted. That is that the Chinese Communist Party is never willing to see China win a complete victory in the present war of resistance through close cooperation between the Chinese Government and our Allied Nations, particularly the United States and Britain. So, whenever the military situation in China develops in our favour, the Communists would not hesitate to resort to malicious propaganda and fabulous attacks on the Central Government in an effort to nullify our military successes. It is not unexpected that the Chinese Communist Party will take the time when difficulties develop in China’s military situation as the ideal hour for them to strike.

The action of the Chinese Communist Party is not decided by the situation in China alone. For instance, before the conclusion of the Russo-German Pact,23 the Chinese Communist Party put up a strong argument in support of a joint peace front between China, the United States, Great Britain and Soviet Russia. But following the conclusion of the said Pact, the Chinese Communist Party’s tone changed into an attack on the United States and Great Britain, branding them as “imperialistic” nations. They called the war a war “between imperialistic countries” in which China should not take part. But when Germany started to attack Soviet Russia,24 the Chinese Communist Party again contradicted their own earlier statement by declaring that this war was a “war against Fascism” and that both the United States and Great Britain were democratic countries. They are opposed, however, to the Allied Nations bringing pressure on Japan at the present moment and they are particularly opposed to the Allied Nations utilizing Soviet military bases in the Far East against Japan. All these contradictory statements made by the Chinese Communists, as you will see, could not be explained by the status of the Chinese Communist Party in China alone.

4. Many puppet troops in Japanese occupied territories in China were forced to surrender to the enemy as a result of treacherous attacks [Page 403] made on them by the armed forces of the Chinese Communist Party while they were engaged in heavy fighting against the enemy. All such treacherous attacks were carried out by the Communist troops either from the flank or from the rear. Being sandwiched in between by the Japanese troops and the Communist forces, these troops were compelled to become puppets. In fact, these troops have no love for the Japanese and they were only victims of circumstances. One does not need to worry as to how these puppet troops would act when the right hour strikes. On the other hand, however, the Central Government, in order to build up a strong front in our war of resistance, has no intention of making use of these puppet units.

One of the main supporters of the Central Government is the Chinese people in Japanese occupied territories. Before the Chinese Communist Party unmasked themselves, these Chinese people, believing that they were a part of the Government troops, welcomed them as they did to other Government forces. However, since 1940, the Chinese Communists gradually showed their treachery and consequently a strong social reaction was created among the Chinese people in occupied areas. Subsequent to that year, in territories not penetrated by the Chinese Communists, the people did everything to prevent them from gaining a foothold in those regions while in all areas under Communist penetration a state of unrest prevailed. To meet the unfavourable situation for them, the Chinese Communists resorted to methods of terror in an effort to terrorize the people into submission. Nevertheless, they persisted in deceiving the people by saying that they were engaged in the war of resistance and that they still supported the Generalissimo. Under such circumstances, the people in Japanese occupied areas are far more enthusiastic and loyal in their support to the Central Government than the general public believes them to be. It is this tendency on the part of the people in occupied territories that worries the Chinese Communists most but against which they could do nothing.

5. 1940 was the year in which the armed forces of the Chinese Communist Party carried out most of their unlawful activities. At the present moment, however, nothing serious has been done by the Chinese Communists aside from concentrating their main force in North Shensi and indulging in independent unlawful acts as a result of the lenient policy now being followed by the Central Government.

6. In order to enable you to have a clear picture of the situation I am sending you herewith a set of photographs showing the banknotes and postal stamps issued by the Communists. In addition, I am going to send you seven important documents promulgated by the Chinese Communist Party dealing with different parts of the bogus [Page 404] administration. All these documents are now being translated by the Foreign Affairs Bureau and they will be sent to you as soon as they are ready. The documents in question are as follows:

(A) Undermining National Unity of China by the Establishment of a Bogus Regime:

1. Decisions concerning the unification of Party leadership in areas used as bases for anti-Japanese activities and decisions for the readjustment of relations between the various Party organizations.

(B) Undermining the National Communication System:

2. Provisional Regulations Governing the Function of the Communications Office of the Shensi–Kansu–Ninghsia Border Regime.

(C) Undermining the National Financial Administration:

3. Regulations Governing the Punishment for Undermining the Currency Administration in the Shensi–Kansu–Ninghsia Border Regime.

4. Text of Proclamation promulgated by the Shensi–Kansu–Ninghsia Border Regime suspending the circulation of legal tender notes.

5. Regulations promulgated by the Finance Department of the Shensi–Kansu–Ninghsia Border Regime Governing the Procedures for exporting legal tender notes.

6. Regulations promulgated by the Finance Department of the Shensi–Kansu–Ninghsia Border Regime Governing the application for permit to export legal tender notes.

(D) Undermining Social Security by Strengthening Secret Service Agencies:

7. Regulations governing the organization of the Anti-Spy Committee of the Shensi–Kansu–Ninghsia Border Regime.

7. Before 1940, the Central Government accorded similar treatment to the Chinese Communists as that given to other citizens of China and encouraged them to join various Government military units for the prosecution of the war of resistance. However, as soon as they joined these military units, the Chinese Communists started to instigate insubordination among these forces and forced them to join the ranks of the Communist forces. Prominent among the troops who had been compelled to join the Communist armed forces were the troops of the 14th Guerrilla Detachment under Shen Tze-chin in North Anhwei, those of the 111th Division of the 57th Army under Chang En-to in Shantung, the 269th Brigade, 169th Brigade, the 2nd Independent Brigade, and two administrative commissioners, Po Yi-po and Chang Wen-ang, under General Yen Hsi-shan, Commander-in-Chief of the 2nd War Area. They all revolted against the Central Government and joined the Communists under the latter’s instigation.

However, since the treachery of the New Fourth Army (a Communist unit) has been brought to light the general public is paying more [Page 405] attention to the activities of the Chinese Communists. It is therefore unlikely that much opportunity will be offered the Communists to conduct illegal activities within the ranks of the Government forces. What is more, many Communist units have disowned their Party and have returned to the fold of the Central Government. Prominent among these troops are those of the 6th Instructional Brigade of the 115th Division under Hsin Jen-pu. In this connexion, I should say that the most effective precautionary measure against Communist activities is to carry out in a thorough-going manner an educational system in strict accordance with the Three Peoples’ Principles of the Kuomintang and to promote the national consciousness of the Chinese people. This measure has already been put into execution and has produced considerable success.

Sincerely yours,

Ho Ying-chin
  1. Signed at Moscow, August 23, 1939, Department of State, Nazi–Soviet Relations, 1939–1941 (Washington, Government Printing Office, 1948), pp. 76, 78.
  2. June 22, 1941; see Foreign Relations, 1941, vol. i, pp. 116 ff., and ibid., vol. iv, pp. 905 ff.