861.24/11–644

The Assistant Secretary of State (Acheson) to the Chairman of the Government Purchasing Commission of the Soviet Union in the United States (Rudenko)

My Dear General Rudenko: With reference to our conversation of November 6 and the letter from Mr. Stepanov which you handed to me at that time, you will find enclosed a reply to Mr. Stepanov which I would appreciate your delivering to him. As agreed between us, I am communicating with our Embassy in Moscow, asking them to give the same information to Mr. Stepanov.

Sincerely yours,

Dean Acheson
[Enclosure]

The Assistant Secretary of State (Acheson) to the Assistant People’s Commissar for Foreign Trade of the Soviet Union (Stepanov)

My Dear Mr. Stepanov: I have received from General Rudenko your letter of November 3 relative to the supplementary agreement to the master lend-lease agreement which we discussed here last summer. You state that you feel that there is perhaps a misunderstanding in regard to the agreement reached on Appendix no. 1. Moreover, you point out that the draft agreement submitted to you on September 14, 1944 contains several provisions regarding which we reached no agreement during the negotiations here.

I wish to assure you that in regard to the question of Appendix no. 1, there was no misunderstanding between us since this specific question was not discussed in detail in Washington. In this connection, we [Page 1153] fully understand that the Soviet authorities in Moscow after giving further and careful consideration to Appendix no. 1 desire to propose amendments to the schedule contained in that Appendix. We will be pleased to receive the further views of the Soviet Government in regard to this matter.

In connection with the other questions raised in your letter, we completely understood that the final draft submitted to you contained certain provisions to which your instructions did not permit you to agree. You will recall, in this regard, that in presenting the final draft to you, we explained that it represents on the points at issue the final position of the United States Government. Moreover, you will recall that in working out the details of the final draft it was explained that because of definite legal limitations we were not in a position to make any further changes in the proposed agreement on several of the specific points which you raised during the discussions.

It is our sincere hope that the Soviet authorities after giving careful consideration to the proposals made will authorize the conclusion of the agreement as contained in the final draft submitted to you, with such modifications as may be mutually agreed upon in Appendix no. 1.

Sincerely yours,

Dean Acheson