740.0011 Pacific War/3428
The Chinese Minister for Foreign Affairs (Soong) to the Secretary of State
Washington, August 18,
1943.
Dear Mr. Secretary: I enclose herewith a
memorandum on the question of China’s representation on various inter-allied
committees, which we discussed when I saw you this morning.
I also enclose for your information a memorandum on our assignments of
Canadian munitions. While it may not be as detailed as my verbal discussion
with you, it is an outline which includes the essential points.
I am [etc.]
[Page 94]
[Enclosure 1]
The Chinese Minister for Foreign Affairs
(Soong) to the Secretary of State
- 1.
- On many occasions the United States Government has declared it to
be its policy that four amongst the United Nations, namely the
United States, Great Britain, the U. S. S. R. and China, which are
bearing the main burden of the war effort, shall also assume the
responsibility for the conduct of the war and for the maintenance of
peace.
- 2.
- Indeed, on one notable occasion when a joint United Nations
agreement, that relating to Relief and Rehabilitation, was being
elaborated, the four Governments, upon the invitation of the U. S.
Department of State, entered into protracted discussions and secured
agreement amongst themselves before the draft instrument was
presented to other United Nations.
- 3.
- The necessity for such prior consultations was stressed on many
occasions in official pronouncements by the United States and
British Governments. On no major issue, however, either relative to
the conduct of the war or to preparations for the future peace, has
this practice been followed so far.
- 4.
- Since that date there have been formed numerous inter-Allied
agencies, civilian and military, for the daily conduct of the war
and for the preparation of the transition from war to peace, and in
each case their membership was limited to United States and British
representatives, although these agencies are assumed to be acting on
behalf of the United Nations.
- Repeated inquiries by Chinese representatives as to their
participation in these agencies have met with negative replies.
Moreover, the Chinese representatives have not even been called upon
to present China’s programs or plans themselves when China’s case is
under deliberation before these agencies. On the one or two
occasions when Chinese representatives did present statements before
the Combined Chiefs of Staff, they were heard rather as witnesses
and did not participate in the actual deliberations, nor were they
parties to the final recommendations although these related to war
operations of vital interest to China.
- 5.
- While the assumed existence of the Four Power leadership continued
to be emphasized by American and British officials, no Chinese
representative was invited to the Casablanca or Washington
conferences at which plans were adopted affecting the China theatre
of war of the United Nations, over which Generalissimo Chiang
Kai-shek is in supreme command. These decisions were only
communicated afterwards and the consequential misunderstandings in
the interpretation
[Page 95]
of the
commitments made to China would have been avoided, had a procedure
for genuine joint collaboration been established and acted
upon.
- 6.
- While the Chinese Government fully appreciates the courtesy of
being informed in informal conversations of some of the matters
under discussion between the United States and British Governments,
yet in its view this procedure falls far short of the political
consultation which is implied by its membership of the group of Four
leading powers, and which was followed in regard to “Relief and
Rehabilitation.”
- 7.
- The new war situation in Europe and the new strategy against Japan
are now again under review by the United States and British
Governments at Quebec. Their conclusions will affect the future
structure of world relationship and of post-war alignments. The
Chinese Government can no longer hide from its people, whose will
determined the decision to oppose Japan in 1937, and from the army,
the fact that China is not a party to either the consultations or
the decisions for the conduct of Allied war operations and Allied
peace plans.
- 8.
- The Chinese Government therefore in all earnestness proposes that:
- (a)
- existing joint and combined agencies, such as the
Munitions Assignment Board, be enlarged to include Chinese
representation on a footing of equality;
- (b)
- inter-Allied machinery, with equal Chinese representation,
be created with a view to insuring coordination of efforts
to carry into effect all decisions jointly reached;
- (c)
- upon the occasion of the Quebec Conference a joint
declaration be made in the above sense.
[Washington,] August 18, 1943.
[Enclosure 2]
The Chinese Minister for Foreign Affairs
(Soong) to the Secretary of State
Memorandum Regarding Canadian Munitions
Many months ago the Chinese Government approached the Canadian Government
for aid in supplying munitions under their Mutual Aid Plan. A definite
program, embracing nearly 60,000 tons of ordnance and supplies for the
next year, was mutually agreed upon between myself representing the
Chinese Government, and Mr. Howe, the Canadian Minister of Munitions.
The program received the official sanction of the Canadian Government,
and orders have been actually placed by them.
[Page 96]
None of these munitions would involve taking away any essential supply of
munitions required by the U. S. or British armies. Shipping for these
supplies to India (where the Chinese Government intend to keep a stock
pile of these goods until the Burma Road or some alternate route, such
as the Iranian Highway through Central Asia, could be developed) are
likewise available.
On various pretexts, technicalities were advanced by the American
authorities through Dr. Lauchlin Currie to have the Canadian Government
either stop or curtail these supplies.
The Secretary is earnestly requested to approach the President to give
instructions that all objections, which are indeed not in line with the
broad and generous friendship of the United States for China, be
withdrawn.
[Washington,] August 18, 1943.