893.248/285

The Ambassador in China (Gauss) to the Secretary of State

No. 1792

Subject: Investigation of Reported Sabotage of Airfield Construction in Hengyang Area.

Sir: I have the honor to enclose a copy of despatch no. 83, October 27, 1943 from the Consul at Kweilin on the above subject. The despatch contains a summary of the memorandum enclosed therewith.

This despatch was prepared, and the investigations upon which it is based were conducted, in response to an instruction from the Embassy sent at the request of General Stilwell’s headquarters. A copy of the report and its enclosure has been transmitted to General Stilwell’s headquarters with the reservations that it must be regarded as secret, that it is not to be used with the Chinese authorities without the consent of the Ambassador, and that in the relations between the American Government and the Chinese authorities, such reports must be used in such manner as not to violate their confidential character, or to disclose their sources, or affect the usefulness and standing of the Foreign Service officers concerned.

Respectfully yours,

C. E. Gauss
[Enclosure]

The Consul at Kweilin (Ringwalt) to the Ambassador in China (Gauss)

No. 83

Sir: I have the honor to refer to the Embassy’s telegram no. 27, dated October 15, 1943, 3 p.m., instructing me to attempt to obtain information in regard to difficulties encountered in the Hengyang area in connection with the construction of airfields, and to enclose herewith a memorandum dated October 26, 1943,94a describing the results of my investigation. In conducting this investigation, I consulted freely with members of the United States armed forces in Changsha, Hengyang and Kweilin, and cautiously and discreetly with Chinese officials, [Page 162] contractors, and businessmen, and with alien employees of the United States Army at Hengyang. Although some of the information obtained in private interviews might be difficult of confirmation in an official investigation, the general picture is believed to be substantially correct.

The following is a summary of the memorandum:

Construction work on the airfields in the Hengyang area has been hampered for a variety of reasons: in Hsiangtan, construction is understood to be delayed because of a lack of funds; in Kanhsien, primarily because of a technicality but (it is rumored) fundamentally because of a fear of Japanese reprisals, work on the airfield has been held up indefinitely; in Namyung and Suichuan, dilatoriness on the part of representatives of the Commission on Aeronautical Affairs has jeopardized United States Army planes; while at Hengyang there seems to be wholesale intimidation, corruption and venality in connection with airfield construction in which representatives of the Commission on Aeronautical Affairs, the War Area Service Corps, and the Hengyang Municipal Government are involved, resulting in the cancelation of one large contract and delay in the completion of several others. One of the chief sources of trouble seems to be the jealousy of the Commission on Aeronautical Affairs (which was formerly supreme in matters pertaining to aviation) of the Ministry of Communications which has taken over most of the important airfield construction work and of the United States Army Air Force which has eclipsed the Chinese Air Force. The Commanding Officer of the United States Army Services of Supply at Kweilin has recommended that an investigation be made of the situation in Hengyang by competent Chinese officials.

Respectfully yours,

Arthur R. Ringwalt
  1. Not printed.