611.3531/1628

Memorandum by the Chief of the Division of Commercial Treaties and Agreements (Hawkins)

I explained to the Secretary yesterday that we had reached agreement with Dr. Prebisch on the general provisions, final minutes, exchanges of notes and proposals with respect to the schedules; that I had agreed to seek Secretary Hull’s approval of these documents as a basis for trade-agreement negotiations with Argentina in the event that it should be decided to undertake such negotiations; and that Dr. Prebisch had agreed to recommend them to his Government. I explained to the Secretary further, that if he indicated his approval by initialing the attached covering memorandum,161 would then initial the original and give it to Dr. Prebisch together with the enclosures and ask him to initial our blue copy of it, advising Dr. Prebisch orally that the Secretary had approved the basis.

I pointed out to the Secretary that if he approved the basis as outlined in these documents we would be bound by these proposals if it should be decided to undertake the negotiations, subject, of course, to the President’s approval, to agreement with the Argentines on proposals which they later will make regarding their Schedule I17 concessions to us, and to the qualification that any of our proposed tariff concessions could be altered if new facts or considerations submitted in written briefs or in the public hearings should so require. I said, however, that in view of the extensive hearings held a year ago and the numerous times these concessions have been discussed, it is unlikely that any new facts or considerations will be presented.

After a brief discussion of several points, the Secretary, who had been given these documents for study several days ago, indicated his approval of the proposed basis and initialed the memorandum.

Today I handed Dr. Prebisch the originals of the attached documents after initialing the covering memorandum and obtaining his initials on the attached blue copy. In doing so, I advised him that the Secretary had approved the recommendations embodied in these documents.

[Page 392]

I referred to the fact that we have not yet reached an understanding on the basis for Argentina’s concessions in Schedule I of the agreement, and suggested that the proposals now under discussion be considered by the Argentine Government and that the latter Government make definite proposals to us with respect to the Schedule. We would then consider them and submit them for approval. Our proposals regarding the rest of the agreement are, of course, contingent on a satisfactory basis being worked out for Schedule I.

I also emphasized to Dr. Prebisch the necessity of keeping these matters completely confidential; that if there should be premature publicity causing political repercussions here and adversely affecting other important issues, it might be necessary to make denials which would render it difficult to proceed with the negotiations. Dr. Prebisch said that he recognized fully the need for, and importance of, secrecy, and that he did not intend to submit the proposals to the Argentine Government for study until he received word from us that this would be all right; that he would meanwhile confine the studies of these documents to officials of the Central Bank where there would be no danger whatever of leakage.

Dr. Prebisch then referred to his conversation with Mr. Wheeler18 at the Department of Agriculture this morning regarding flaxseed, which he said was very discouraging to him in that it did not appear that the Department of Agriculture has materially changed its policy in the direction of discouraging flaxseed production, and particularly because of the estimate of an official of the Department of Agriculture that imports are not on the average likely to exceed 10,000,000 bushels. He said that in view of Department of Agriculture’s policies and the discouraging outlook for imports of Argentine flaxseed, he felt compelled to make less favorable recommendations respecting Argentine concessions in Schedule I than he had previously intended. For this reason, he was not prepared to recommend the proposals for Schedule I which had been drawn up. Nevertheless, I gave him copies of these proposals, marking them “tentative”, and suggested that on his return to Buenos Aires he draw up a firm offer on Schedule I and submit it to us for consideration. I reminded him, however, that all of our proposals regarding other parts of the agreement are conditioned upon a satisfactory Schedule I and urged him to keep the foregoing in mind in formulating the proposals on this Schedule. I said further that if the proposals submitted by the Argentine Government were materially less favorable than those we had discussed, I did not think they could be accepted.

[Page 393]

With respect to the subject of regional preferences, I said that the Secretary, having approved our proposals, is sending a note to this effect to the Argentine Ambassador in reply to the Ambassador’s note on this subject. I asked, however, that care be taken to avoid any publicity on this subject until it comes up in the Inter-American Committee, and that when the matter does become public an effort be made to dispel the idea that this involves the abandonment or any material impairment of the policy of either country with respect to the most-favored-nation principle. I said that press reports of the discussion of this subject at the Montevideo Conference indicated the need of taking steps to avoid such misinterpretation. Dr. Prebisch said that he would make every effort to see that this matter is not misconstrued in the manner indicated.

Harry C. Hawkins
[Annex 1]

Draft General Provisions

[Aside from a few slight verbal changes the articles of this draft were the same as the final text signed October 14, 1941, Department of State Executive Agreement Series No. 277, or 56 Stat. (pt. 2) 1685, with the following exceptions:

Article IV, paragraph 3: The following sentence in the draft does not appear in the final agreement: “If the Government of either country avails itself of the rights reserved under this paragraph, it shall inform the government of the other country in writing.”

Article VI, paragraph 2: The phrase in the first sentence of the final agreement “prior to the date of publication” reads in the draft: “prior to the expiration of thirty days after the date of publication.”

Article VII, paragraph 1: The following final sentence in the draft does not appear in the final agreement: “Furthermore, the said articles shall not be assessed for customs purposes at valuations higher than those specified in the said Schedule.”

Article XIII: In the draft the following phrase appears at the end of the first sentence: “on the day of the signature of this Agreement.”

Article XV, paragraph 2: At the end of this paragraph there was a footnote reading as follows: “The Government of the United States may wish to propose the following additional clause: ‘(d) should that country be engaged in hostilities or war.’”

Article XVI. This article in the draft contained three paragraphs instead of two as in the final agreement. Paragraph 1 was omitted [Page 394] and the other paragraphs were renumbered in the final draft. Paragraph 1 reads:

“Greater than nominal penalties will not be imposed in the United States of America or in the Argentine Republic upon importations of articles the growth, produce or manufacture of the other country because of errors in documentation obviously clerical in origin or where good faith can be established.”]

[Annex 2]

Final Minutes

With a view to recording the understanding which the Delegations of the United States of America and the Argentine Republic reached with respect to certain provisions of the Trade Agreement signed today, the Minutes of the Final Meeting of the two Delegations have been drawn up as follows:

1.
It was agreed that if the Government of either country finds it necessary to invoke the provisions of the second paragraph of Article XI or of the first paragraph of Article XII, it will in practice, prior to taking such action, afford the other Government adequate opportunity for consultation in regard to the proposed measure through the medium of the Commission provided for in the second paragraph of Article XII.
2.
With reference to the Exchange of Notes relating to preferences to the areas covered by the existing payments arrangement between Argentina and the United Kingdom and to contiguous countries, respectively, it was agreed that the Government of either country, prior to according any such preference, would in practice afford the Government of the other country adequate opportunity for consultation through the medium of the said Commission.
3.
With reference to Article III, paragraph 2, it was of course understood that no obstacles of any kind would be placed in the way of imports of any product of interest to the other country unless it should be decided (subject to the provisions of Article XI) to announce publicly the imposition of a global quota and the allotments, if any, among the various supplying countries; moreover, it was agreed that once any global quota established by either country or the share therein allotted to the other country has been publicly announced as effective for a stated period, it will not ordinarily be reduced during that period.
4.
It was agreed that, while the texts of these minutes would not be published as such, there would be no objection to making the substance of them generally public.

[Page 395]
[Annex 3]

Memorandum by Mr. Vernon L. Phelps, of the Division of Commercial Treaties and Agreements

During the exploratory conversations just concluded between the representatives of the Argentine Government and of the Government of the United States with a view to finding a basis for undertaking the negotiation of a trade agreement it was agreed, in the event that it should be decided to proceed with such negotiations, (1) that prior to announcement of trade-agreement negotiations the Argentine Government would provide the Government of the United States a complete list of the preferences which it would accord to the United Kingdom and to contiguous countries, as envisaged in the exchanges of notes relating to such preferences, during an initial period of not less than three months following the coming into force of the agreement; and (2) that any modification of the said list of preferences applicable to any subsequent period would be made effective only after adequate opportunity on the part of the Government of the United States for consultation relative thereto through the medium of the mixed commission as provided for in Article XII of the draft general provisions and in the Final Minutes.

[Annex 4]

Draft Proposal for Sliding Scale of Tariff Reductions

It is understood that Argentina would undertake to grant the tariff reductions, generally on a sliding scale basis, and the bindings of present rates of duty, indicated in the attached tentative Schedule I.19

The sliding scale basis would be established as follows:20

A. First Stage

The first reductions in Argentine import duties shall become effective immediately upon the entry into force of the agreement and may apply to any or all of the tariff items enumerated in the attached tentative Schedule I that may be selected by the United States during the negotiations; provided that the loss in Argentine customs revenues resulting from the reductions effected in the first stage shall not exceed approximately 2,000,000 paper pesos as calculated from a previously agreed upon estimate of Argentine customs revenues for the year 1941.

It is agreed that any reduction in import duty made by Argentina [Page 396] pursuant to the foregoing formula shall remain in force despite any eventual reduction in total customs revenues.

B. Second Stage

The second-stage reductions in Argentine import duties shall become effective when total Argentine customs revenues reach 271,000,000 paper pesos. These reductions shall apply to all tariff items enumerated in the attached tentative Schedule I, other than those upon which rates of duty may have been bound and those on which the full reductions requested have become effective in the first stage, and the extent of such reductions shall be not less than one half of the percentual reductions indicated in the first column of the attached tentative Schedule I.

As indicated in the final paragraph describing the first stage, any reduction made by Argentina in the second stage shall remain in force despite any eventual reduction in total customs revenues.

C. Third Stage

The third-stage reductions in Argentine import duties shall become effective when total Argentine customs revenues reach 300,000,000 paper pesos. These reductions shall be not less than the reductions indicated in the first column of the attached tentative Schedule I plus the reductions indicated in the second column of that schedule.

As indicated in the discussion of the first and second stages, any reduction made by Argentina in the third stage shall remain in force despite any eventual reduction in total customs revenues.

It was understood also that sympathetic and objective consideration would be given to the requests for modifications of the descriptions of articles indicated in tentative Schedule I of January 15, 1941; to the notes included in the said schedule; and to the requests for duty reductions or adjustments in tariff classification, as the case may be, in respect of those articles listed in Part B of the attached tentative Schedule I.

It was further understood that any preference in regard to sulphur would be confined to Chilean sulphur and that the United States would be given a quota on sulphur amounting to not less than 10% of the total importations during the period of hostilities between the United Kingdom and Germany.

With reference to machines and spare parts (weighing less than 100 net kilograms) and automobile parts and accessories, it was agreed that duty reductions would be granted on those machines, parts and accessories which are not now produced in Argentina at all or are not being produced there on a sound economic basis, or on those subject to unreasonably high duties. In the case of other machines, parts and [Page 397] accessories, there would be no objection to binding existing rates of duty.

[Annex 5]

Exchange of Notes Under Consideration During Previous Negotiations

Excellency: I have the honor to refer to conversations which have taken place, in connection with the trade agreement signed this day, regarding the desirability of consultation between the two Governments with regard to certain matters.

It is my understanding that each Government, whenever practicable, will consult with the Government of the other country with respect to such measures as export subsidies, governmentally fixed prices, and other forms of compensation on sales, which may have the effect of artificially determining prices or which, by interfering with the free play of supply and demand, may tend to prejudice the interests of the other country.

I avail myself of this opportunity to renew to Your Excellency the assurances of my highest consideration,

[Other annexes, not printed, included drafts for Argentine notes. These notes, slightly revised, appear in the final agreement, Department of State Executive Agreement Series No. 277, or 56 Stat. (pt. 2) 1685. Also attached were draft schedules I, II, and III, not printed. The final texts of the schedules also appear in Executive Agreement Series No. 277, or 56 Stat. (pt. 2) 1685.]

  1. Not printed.
  2. Schedule of rates of duties on articles grown, produced, or manufactured in the United States imported into Argentina; not printed.
  3. Leslie A. Wheeler, Director of the Office of Foreign Agricultural Relations.
  4. Not printed.
  5. The Department later agreed to an Argentine suggestion that the three stages here mentioned he reduced to two. This agreement appears as Note I to Schedule I in the final text.