724.3415/3505: Telegram
The Minister in Bolivia ( Des Fortes ) to the Acting Secretary of State
[Received 5:15 p.m.]
9. The Bolivian reply was made last night. It suggests that no new action be made until the attitude of the League is defined, and make following observations regarding formula: It delays fixing terms and bases arbitration, it being easy to foresee that without an accord, arbitration would result impracticable, therefore Bolivia could not retire or demobilize troops. If arbitration were now arranged for, Bolivia would be disposed to consider clauses of security which are not against dignity and sovereignty but these should be precise and clear to avoid future complications. For Bolivia 6 months’ armistice is acceptable only on stipulation that no direct accord being arrived at in the period The Hague Court would automatically take over the question of territorial arbitration within the lines proposed here by the League Commission, i. e., arbitration juris under principles of August [Page 48] 3, 1932,22 which marks position of both parties, and further that a period be arranged when with or without presentation of evidence by one or both parties the tribunal will pronounce.
The Bolivian reply ends with opinion that the formula leads certainly to a temporary suspension of hostilities but leaves the principal question undefined, a germ for new conflicts.
Repeated to Buenos Aires, Asunción. Please repeat to the Secretary of State.