722.2315/781

The Ambassador in Peru (Dearing) to the Acting Secretary of State

No. 3225

Sir: I have the honor to transmit herewith a copy of a note from the Ecuadorian Minister in Lima relative to the boundary negotiations between Peru and Ecuador and certain protocol formalities involving a possible eventual transfer of negotiations to Washington and arbitration by the President of the United States, with a memorandum attached, both dated January 11, 1934, handed to me during Secretary Hull’s visit at Lima2 by the Secretary of the Legation of Ecuador, who also gave me a duplicate copy which the Minister especially requested be given to the Secretary. It was actually delivered to Mr. Cumming for the Secretary by Mr. de Lambert of the Embassy staff on January 11th.

In this connection, it will doubtless be of interest to the Department to hear that Dr. Polo stated to me, during a visit to the Foreign Office on January 15th, that the negotiations with Ecuador were proceeding satisfactorily. The Peruvian Foreign Minister mentioned that he had been informed by the Ecuadorian Minister, with whom he had had a conversation shortly before my visit, that the technical advisers who were to aid him in the matter were on the point of embarking for Lima. Dr. Polo expressed the feelings that the negotiations in Lima will be successful and stated that the question of transferring the negotiations to Washington will only arise in case the Lima negotiations fail and the arbitration provided for in the Protocol requires the transfer of the negotiations to Washington. He stated that he had that day instructed the Peruvian Ambassador in Washington to get in touch with his Ecuadorian colleague and simultaneously with him to approach our Government and request its “venia”3 for the purposes mentioned, viz: the transfer of the negotiations to Washington and the arbitration of the President of the United States in case the Lima negotiations fail.

[Page 458]

I may add that the atmosphere here seems rather improved through the announcement of the early departure for Lima of the Commissioners from Ecuador who are to aid the local Ecuadorian Minister in the negotiations.

It is difficult to say whether the lull in the Leticia conversations at Rio de Janeiro4 will have any immediate effect upon the Peruvian-Ecuadorian negotiations or not.

The receipt of the note of the Ecuadorian Minister has been acknowledged to him with a statement that it was being forwarded to the Department and would, without doubt, receive both the Secretary’s and the Department’s attention.

Respectfully yours.

For the Ambassador:
Louis G. Dreyfus, Jr.

Counselor of Embassy
[Enclosure—Translation]

The Ecuadoran Minister in Peru (Lafronte) to the American Ambassador in Peru (Dearing)

The Minister of Ecuador in Lima presents his cordial greetings to his distinguished and esteemed friend, His Excellency, the Ambassador of the United States of America, and would be very grateful if the Ambassador would consent to inform extra-officially to His Excellency, the Secretary of State of the United States of America, that on the eighth instant His Excellency, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Peru and the Minister of Ecuador at Lima agreed to have the diplomatic representatives of Ecuador and Peru in Washington, acting jointly, request in simultaneous notes to be transmitted the fifteenth of this month to the Department of State, the acquiescence of the Government of the United States of America to constitute in due time in Washington, D. C, the delegations provided for in Article I of the Protocol signed at Quito on June 21, 1924.5

Independent of constituting in due time the aforesaid delegations in Washington, there will be initiated in the near future in Lima, in accordance with the provisions of Article IV of the same Protocol, direct negotiations toward the solution of the border dispute between Ecuador and Peru.

All antecedents of the case are included in the annexed memorandum.

Viteri Lafronte takes this opportunity [etc.]

[Page 459]
[Subenclosure—Translation]

Memorandum

I

In the year 1923 the governments of the republics of Ecuador and Peru requested the consent of the government of the United States of America to constitute in Washington delegations that would endeavor to solve the problem of limits pending between Ecuador and Peru.

II

The government of the United States gave its assent, but pointed out the advisability that the constitution of such delegations be effected after a solution had been reached of the question that the governments of Chile and Peru had at the time submitted to the arbitration of the President of the United States of America.

III

With these antecedents there was signed in Quito the protocol of June 21, 1924, the text of which is as follows:

Protocol

“Their Excellencies, Dr. N. Clemente Ponce, Minister of Foreign Affairs of Ecuador, and Señor Enrique Castro Oyanguren, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary of Peru, meeting at the Foreign Office, declared that they had received instructions from their respective governments to put into execution the purposes already expressed and agreed to by them in conferences and in official documents regarding the manner to comply with the mixed formula for the definitive solution of the question of limits between both countries.

“In compliance with the aforesaid instructions and in the desire of arriving as speedily as possible to a solution in concord and equity, as befits the sentiment of loyalty and of genuine Americanism which inspires both governments and in satisfaction of the legitimate interests of both peoples, they state formally the following:

  • “1. The two governments, having first received the consent of the government of the United States of America, shall send to Washington their respective delegations to enter into a friendly consideration of the question of limits, in order that they may determine by common agreement, should it not be possible to fix a definitive boundary, the zones that each of the two parties may recognize to the other, the fixing of the boundary to be submitted to the arbitral decision of the President of the United States of America.
  • “2. Having achieved one or the other of the two aforementioned purposes, the delegations shall so state it in a protocol designed by them and to be submitted to the approval of the Congresses of both nations.
  • “3. The delegations shall be constituted in Washington immediately after a solution is reached of the question that the governments of [Page 460] Peru and Chile have submitted to the arbitration of the President of the United States. As regards the appointment of Delegates both governments shall have the power of making such appointment at any time, but in any case the Delegations shall be organized in Washington within the period referred to in this article.
  • “4. Independent of the provisions of the foregoing clauses, the two governments through their respective Ministers, will endeavor to advance the solution of the litigation.

“Signed in duplicate, on the twenty-first day of June of the year one thousand nine hundred and twenty-four.

N. Clemente Ponce

E. Castro Oyanguren.”

IV

The Government of Peru, in a note dated October 18, 1933, invited the Government of Ecuador to initiate direct negotiations for the solution of the boundary dispute in accordance with the provisions of Article IV of the aforementioned Protocol.

V

The Government of Ecuador, in a note dated November 21 last, accepted the invitation of Peru to begin direct negotiations at Lima; but at the same time, invited the Government of Peru to request the consent of the Government of the United States of America for the constitution, in due time, in Washington, of the respective delegations, as provided for by Article I of the aforementioned Protocol.

VI

The request for the consent of the Government of the United States shall be made in simultaneous notes to the Department of State to be sent on the 15th instant by the Ambassador of Peru in Washington and by the Minister Plenipotentiary of Ecuador in the same federal capital.

VII

Independent of the foregoing direct negotiations will soon be started in Lima as stipulated by Article IV of the aforementioned Protocol.

Ancón, January 11, 1934.

  1. Mr. Hull was returning from Montevideo, where he had gone as Chairman of the American delegation to the Seventh International Conference of American States, December 3–26, 1933. See ibid, pp. 1 ff.
  2. Permission or authorization.
  3. For correspondence concerning the Leticia dispute between Colombia and Peru, see pp. 321 ff.
  4. Quoted in subenclosure, infra.