761.00/297

The Ambassador of the Soviet Union (Troyanovsky) to the Secretary of State 36

The Ambassador of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics presents his compliments to the Secretary of State and has the honor to bring to his attention the enclosed authentic text of a statement made today to the press by Mr. Maxim M. Litvinoff, People’s Commissar of Foreign Affairs of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The views set forth in the enclosed statement represent the position of the Government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in regard to the outstanding problems of international relations.

[Enclosure]

Statement to the Press by Mr. Maxim M. Litvinov, People’s Commissar for Foreign Affairs of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, March 17, 1938

“Having joined the League of Nations for the purpose of organized cooperation with other peace-loving countries the Soviet Government has never missed a suitable occasion to recommend the most effective guarantees of peace which it has seen in the organization of the system of collective security within the framework of the League of Nations as well as in regional pacts of mutual assistance against aggressors.

“The Soviet Government followed this path in practice when it concluded such pacts, with France and Czechoslovakia, pacts, which, in the absence of aggression do not menace any country whatever. The violations of those international obligations which derive from the Covenant of the League of Nations37 and from the Kellogg-Briand [Page 540] Paris Pact,38 as well as the attacks on some states by other states which occurred in the course of the past four years provided occasions for the Soviet Government to demonstrate not only its condemnation of these international crimes but also its readiness to take an active part in all measures aiming at the organization of a collective repulse of the aggressor even disregarding the inevitable prejudice to its relations with the aggressor. At the same time the Soviet Government voiced warnings that international inaction and impunity of aggression in one case would inevitably lead to the repetition and multiplication of similar cases. Unfortunately the international developments have justified these warnings. They received a new confirmation in the armed invasion of Austria and in the forcible deprivation of the Austrian people of their political, economic and cultural independence. While formerly cases of aggression occurred on continents more or less remote from Europe or on the outskirts of Europe and affected, along with the interests of the victim of aggression, the interests of only a few countries situated in the immediate proximity, this time the violence has been perpetrated in the center of Europe and has created an indubitable menace not only for the eleven countries now contiguous with the aggressor but also for all European states, and not only European ones.

“Thus far the menace has been directed against the territorial integrity and against the political, economic and cultural independence of small nations, but the inevitable enslavement of these countries will create prerequisites for pressure and even for attacks against large states as well. In the first place arises the menace to Czechoslovakia, but owing to the contagious character of aggression the danger threatens to grow later on into new international conflicts and this already manifests itself in the alarming situation which has arisen on the Polish-Lithuanian frontier. The present international situation places before all peace-loving states and the great powers in particular the question of their responsibility for the destinies of the peoples of Europe, and, not of Europe alone. The Soviet Government, being cognizant of its share in this responsibility, being also cognizant of its obligations under the Covenant of the League of Nations, under the Kellogg-Briand Pact and under the treaties of mutual assistance concluded with France and Czechoslovakia, I can state on its behalf that on its part it is ready as before to participate in collective action which would be decided upon jointly with it and which would aim at checking the further development of aggression and at eliminating the aggravated danger of a new world massacre. It is prepared immediately to take up, in the League of Nations or outside of it, deliberation with other powers on practical measures which circumstances demand. [Page 541] Tomorrow may be too late, but today time for it is not yet gone if all states and the great powers in particular take a firm and unambiguous stand on the problem of the collective salvation of peace.”

  1. Handed to the Secretary of State by the Ambassador of the Soviet Union, March 17, 1938.

    An annotation by Pierrepont Moffat, Chief of the Division of European Affairs, stated: “The Secretary decided today that in view of the fact that no formal reply was called for, none need be sent. Ap[ri]l 11, 1938.”

  2. For text, see Foreign Relations, Paris Peace Conference, 1919, vol. xiii, p. 69.
  3. Treaty for the Renunciation of War, signed August 27, 1928, Foreign Relations, 1928, vol. i, p. 153.