893.00B/602

The Minister in Latvia (Coleman) to the Secretary of State

No. 6200

Sir: I have the honor to report that the Soviet press has taken no notice of the unpleasantnesses between the Chinese authorities and the Bolshevik representatives in China except to publish on June 1 a note of the People’s Commissariat of Foreign Affairs, protesting against the search of the Soviet Consulate General at Harbin, and the accompanying circumstances and indignities, and to support this note with firm editorials. That of the official newspaper has been translated in part. The Pravda’s is quite similar. The prolonged silence of the Soviet press may, perhaps, be taken as an indication that these incidents will have further consequences. There is no effort to conceal the fact that the real issue is the control of the Chinese Eastern Railway. Silence may, perhaps, be due to uncertainty as to the attitude of Japan.

I have [etc.]

F. W. B. Coleman
[Page 193]
[Enclosure—Translation]

The Soviet Acting Commissar for Foreign Affairs (Karakhan) to the Chinese Chargé in the Soviet Union (Hsia)71

Mr. Chargé d’Affaires: On May 27, at 2 o’clock p.m. the premises of the Consulate General of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics at Harbin were suddenly invaded by a detail of police. A search was made which lasted about six hours. During all this time the Consul General of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, Mr. Melnikov, and his assistants were detained and were deprived of the possibility of communicating with the outside world. With respect of the Vice Consul Mr. Znamensky, physical force was employed. Regardless of the decisive protest of the Consul, the police took away a part of the Consular correspondence, and arrested all the visitors, to the number of 39, there were in the various rooms of the Consulate. All of those arrested were Soviet citizens living in Manchuria. Among them were many employees of Soviet state economic institutions and of the administration at Harbin of the Chinese Eastern Railway, who had come there on the affairs of their institutions or had called on passport and visa business, and, lastly, three temporary extra workers at the Consulate. Chinese policemen and Russian white-guardsmen serving in the Chinese police openly carried off money and things, belonging to the Consulate and its employees.

On the next day after the search the police for its part published a statement, exceptional for shamelessness and stupidity, about a “session of the III International”, alleged to have been going on in the “basement[”] of the Consulate and to have been discovered by them. At the same time, with the manifest inspiration of the self-same police, the Chinese and white-guard press is printing further provocative inventions, designed to justify the illegalities of the police authorities.

The police raid and search in the premises of the Consulate General of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which is under the protection of international law, was a flagrant violation of the very bases of international law. The detention of the Consul and his assistants for six hours; the arrest of visitors, including those found in the office of the Consul General himself; the seizure of Consular correspondence, inviolable under international law, accentuate still more the violent and lawless character of all this affair, emphasizing the complete contempt of the police authorities for the elementary principles of international law and international intercourse.

[Page 194]

The outright outrages on the part of the policemen which accompanied the search—the pilferage of property and money, the physical violence offered to Consular assistants, are the natural concomitants of such arbitrary conduct, and fully correspond to the character of the whole conduct of the police authorities toward a Consulate General of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

The actions of the Harbin police authorities do not at all acquire legality from the wholly unfounded and provocative explanations and charges against the Consulate that these authorities are publishing in the press. The statements about a “session of the III International” going on in the Consulate is a manifest, stupid invention, without rhyme or reason, moreover, as is plain to be seen, and is merely an awkward attempt on the part of these same local authorities to evade merited responsibility for their flagrant actions, apt to create new complications in the mutual relationships between the two neighboring countries.

The Union government is obliged to bring to the attention of the Government of the Chinese Republic that the unlawful police raid on the Consulate General of the U. S. S. R. at Harbin occurred after prolonged preparation in the form of a provocative campaign begun against the Soviet Union and against its Consular offices, which found expression not only in irresponsible observations in the press but also in slanderous utterances on the part of official and unofficial persons and institutions of the National Government. The Union government finds that a regular police raid on the premises of the Consulate General of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics at Harbin, together with the above mentioned campaign, creates a situation in which the normal work of the Consular offices of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on Chinese territory becomes exceedingly difficult, if not wholly impossible. The resulting position is the more serious in that the recent events were preceded by the raid on the Embassy of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics at Peking on August [April] 6, 1927, the white-guard raid on the Soviet Consulate at Shanghai on October 25, 1927, the devastation of the Soviet Consulate at Canton in December, 1927, accompanied by the killing of 5 of its employees, and a number of violent actions inflicted by the Chinese side upon the Chinese Eastern Railway. All these acts, responsibility for which lies at the doors of various Chinese authorities, as is known, still remain unatoned, and are hindering the reestablishment of normal Chinese-Soviet relationships.

The Union government, for its part, in spite of a series of acts of exceptionally provocative character on the part of Chinese authorities [Page 195] with respect of the Embassy and the Consulates of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in China, has with inexhaustible patience refrained from answering with any repressive measures, justified as they would be by the circumstances. The Union government in particular has continued to render to the Mission and Consulates of the Chinese Republic on the territory of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics all the protection that is assured to them by international law and that is essential to their normal functioning. The Union government has been guided in this matter by the desire to assure to the Chinese citizens, living on the territory of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the same degree of protection and care, on the part of their Consular institutions, that are enjoyed by the foreign citizens of other Powers, which maintain with the Soviet Union diplomatic relations. The Union government is obliged, however, to affirm that this calm and friendly position of its is, obviously, being distorted by influences hostile to the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics into proof of its readiness to leave unanswered all future provocations of its Consular offices in China.

Confronted with a new provocative and violent act with respect of its Consular service, the Union government is obliged to make the most decided protest against said police outrages, and to demand an immediate order for the liberation of the Soviet citizens arrested in the premises of the Consulate, and the return of all the correspondence that was carried off and all the things and money that were stolen.

At the same time the Union government is obliged to declare that, as the Chinese authorities with all their actions plainly show that they neither can nor will give due weight to the universally accepted norms of international law and usage, it for its part no longer regards itself as bound by these norms with respect of the Chinese Representation at Moscow and the Chinese Consulates on the Soviet territory, and that in future this Representation and the Consulates will not be conceded the right of extraterritoriality, with which international law clothes them.

The Union government declares that the Soviet Union in all circumstances inalterably strives to maintain and sustain friendly relations with the Chinese people. The Union government is obliged, however, most decisively to warn the Nanking Government and its organs from further trying the longsuffering of the government of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics with provocative acts and with the violation of treaties and agreements.

Accept [etc.]

Karakhan
  1. Translation from text printed in the Moscow Izvestia, No. 123, June 1, 1929.